WHITE HOUSE

Obama Greets Arizona Immigration Ruling With Praise, Concern

Both Obama and Romney say the ruling underscores the need for comprehensive federal reform.

Updated: June 25, 2012 | 4:14 p.m.
June 25, 2012 | 3:11 p.m.

President Obama on Monday applauded the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down most of Arizona’s immigration law but said he was concerned about the controversial "show me your papers" provision that was upheld.

"I remain concerned about the practical impact of the remaining provision of the Arizona law that requires local law enforcement officials to check the immigration status of anyone they even suspect to be here illegally," he said in a statement.

“What this decision makes unmistakably clear is that Congress must act on comprehensive immigration reform,” Obama added. "A patchwork of thate laws is not a solution to our broken immigration system-- it's part of the problem."

Obama's all-but-assured GOP rival this fall, Mitt Romney, drew a similar conclusion from the ruling. But while Romney criticized Obama for failing to lead on the issue, Obama stressed the need for Congress to act. The president, who has encountered solid GOP opposition, declared himself ready to work with anyone in Congressinterested in comprehensive immigration reform.

White House press secretary Jay Carney criticized Romney for being supportive of SB 1070, the law the court largely struck down. “Romney has embraced the Arizona law as a model for the nation – which does not suggest a desire for comprehensive bipartisan immigration reform,” he said.

Romney did cite an Arizona immigration law as a model for the nation, but it wasn't SB 1070; it was an earlier law requiring employers to check the immigration status of potential workers through a federal online database called E-Verify.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »