WHITE HOUSE

Obama Greets Arizona Immigration Ruling With Praise, Concern

Both Obama and Romney say the ruling underscores the need for comprehensive federal reform.

Updated: May 29, 2013 | 10:06 p.m.
June 25, 2012 | 3:11 p.m.

President Obama on Monday applauded the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down most of Arizona’s immigration law but said he was concerned about the controversial "show me your papers" provision that was upheld.

"I remain concerned about the practical impact of the remaining provision of the Arizona law that requires local law enforcement officials to check the immigration status of anyone they even suspect to be here illegally," he said in a statement.

“What this decision makes unmistakably clear is that Congress must act on comprehensive immigration reform,” Obama added. "A patchwork of thate laws is not a solution to our broken immigration system-- it's part of the problem."

Obama's all-but-assured GOP rival this fall, Mitt Romney, drew a similar conclusion from the ruling. But while Romney criticized Obama for failing to lead on the issue, Obama stressed the need for Congress to act. The president, who has encountered solid GOP opposition, declared himself ready to work with anyone in Congressinterested in comprehensive immigration reform.

White House press secretary Jay Carney criticized Romney for being supportive of SB 1070, the law the court largely struck down. “Romney has embraced the Arizona law as a model for the nation – which does not suggest a desire for comprehensive bipartisan immigration reform,” he said.

Romney did cite an Arizona immigration law as a model for the nation, but it wasn't SB 1070; it was an earlier law requiring employers to check the immigration status of potential workers through a federal online database called E-Verify.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Hands-Free Won't Cut It

3:22 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Consider the Opportunity Before Us

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 17, 2013

Latest Response by Phyllis Cuttino: TBD

Energy Experts

What's the Future of Electric Cars?

June 14, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Electric Cars and Their Dirty Secret

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »