WHITE HOUSE

Obama Attacks Romney at UAW

Updated: March 5, 2012 | 1:48 p.m.
February 28, 2012 | 3:51 p.m.

President Obama speaks to auto workers on Tuesday.  (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

President Obama, launching his most direct campaign attack yet at a Republican foe, on Tuesday mocked Mitt Romney’s stance on the automobile industry, telling autoworkers that the former Massachusetts governor’s recent statements are an effort to “rewrite history” and “a load of you-know-what.” The stinging assault on Romney came in remarks to the United Auto Workers convention in Washington on the day of the Michigan primary, after a campaign in which Romney has tried to wriggle out of his controversial opposition to efforts by two presidents to rescue the auto industry in 2008 and 2009.

The speech marks a new phase of the campaign for the president, who has largely ignored the Republicans fighting to oppose him in November. He made no direct mention of Romney’s name. But there was no doubt of his target as he twice quoted from the Republican candidate’s op-ed, published in The New York Times on Nov. 18, 2008 under the headline “Let Detroit Go Bankrupt.”

Obama challenged “the naysayers” to admit they were wrong to oppose the rescue efforts, to “finally come around and say that standing by American workers was the right thing to do.” After quoting again from Romney’s article, Obama added, “I’ve got to admit, it’s been funny to watch some of these folks completely try to rewrite history now that you’re back on your feet. The same folks who said if we went forward with our plan to rescue Detroit, ‘you can kiss the American automotive industry goodbye.’  Now they’re saying we were right all along.  Or... worse, they’re saying that the problem is that you, the workers, made out like bandits in all of this; that saving the American auto industry was just about paying back unions.”

Incredulously, the president asked: “Really?” He added, “I mean, even by the standards of this town, that’s a load of you-know-what. About 700,000 retirees saw a reduction in the health care benefits they had earned. Many of you saw hours reduced, or pay and wages scaled back. You gave up some of your rights as workers. Promises were made to you over the years that you gave up for the sake and survival of this industry, its workers, and their families.”

The president criticized Republicans for “still talking about you as if you’re some greedy special interest that needs to be beaten,” asking, “Since when are hardworking men and women special interests?” Striking the populist tone of his earlier speeches in Kansas and this year's State of the Union, he said, “This notion that we should have let the auto industry die, that we should pursue antiworker policies in hopes unions like yours will unravel – it’s part of that same old you’re-on-your-own philosophy that says we should just leave everyone to fend for themselves.”

Romney and the Republicans fired back at the president after the speech, with Kirsten Kukowski of the Republican National Committee accusing Obama of “putting his reelection over keeping his promises to the American people.” She called the rescue of the auto industry “an insider deal for his union cronies.”  Romney spokesperson Andrea Saul said the speech was just another effort by the White House to “kill Romney.” She said the president has “failed Michigan,” adding, “No other candidate cares for Michigan or the automotive industry like Mitt Romney does, and he is heartbroken to see what has happened to his native state.”

Obama spent the beginning of his remarks reminding the autoworkers of how dire their situation was when he took office, again noting that he stood with them when others, including Romney, abandoned them. “America faced a hard and once unimaginable reality: that two of the Big Three automakers  – GM and Chrysler – were on the brink of liquidation,” he said, before pointedly noting that Romney’s prescription would not have worked. “With the economy in complete free fall,” he said, “there were no private companies or investors willing to take a chance on the auto industry. Nobody was lining up to give you guys loans. Anyone in the financial sector could tell you that.” He added, “The other option we had was to do absolutely nothing, and let these companies fail. And you will recall, there were some politicians who said we should. Some even said we should ‘let Detroit go bankrupt’.” Boos rose from the audience at that.

Obama said that if he had followed that advice – from Romney – General Motors and Chrysler “wouldn’t exist today. The suppliers and distributors that get their business from those companies would have died off, too. Then even Ford could have gone down as well. Production: shut down. Factories: shuttered. Once-proud companies chopped up and sold off for scraps. And all of you – the men and women who built these companies with your own hands – would’ve been hung out to dry.”

Obama said that would have left more than a million Americans out of work in the industry and devastated communities that depend on the industry. “So,” Obama said, “no, we were not going to take a knee and do nothing. We were not going to give up on your jobs, your families, and your communities.” He said the rescue plan demanded something from everyone. “We said the auto industry would have to truly change, not just pretend that you’re changing....  We got labor and management to settle their differences. We got the industry to retool and restructure. And everybody involved made sacrifices. Everyone had some skin in the game. It wasn’t popular, and it wasn’t what I ran for President to do....  But I did run to do the tough things – the right things – no matter what the politics are.”

The result today, Obama proclaimed, is that “the American auto industry is back.”

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »