WHITE HOUSE

Michelle v. Michele: The Breastfeeding Battle

The first lady wants a nanny state. Or so Michele Bachmann says.

Updated: February 15, 2011 | 6:11 p.m.
February 15, 2011 | 5:36 p.m.

Rep. Michele Bachmann wants Michelle Obama to keep her hands off America's breast pumps. The first lady has promoted breastfeeding. The IRS is now offering a tax break for breastfeeding supplies.

Michelle Obama has found herself the target of criticism from yet another high-profile conservative woman who says that the first lady's initiatives promote a “nanny state."

Reports surfaced this week that Obama will highlight breastfeeding as a path to reducing childhood obesity and will try to remove barriers for women who choose that method of feeding their infant. The Internal Revenue Service helped the cause when it announced last week that it would offer a tax break on breastfeeding supplies, though it is unclear whether Obama has encouraged women to take advantage of the tax breaks.

But that didn’t stop Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., from firing away at the first lady on Tuesday afternoon on conservative host Laura Ingraham’s radio show. "I've given birth to five babies, and I breast-fed every single one," Bachmann said. "To think that government has to go out and buy my breast pump for my babies? You wanna talk about the nanny state?” 

It’s not the first time that Obama has been criticized for her promotion of healthier eating and living. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin told viewers of her television show, Sarah Palin’s Alaska, that she was eating s’mores in honor of the first lady – who has said she tells her own children that “dessert is not a right” – and had delivered cookies to a school in Pennsylvania. Palin also said that the government was acting like a nanny state in trying to limit the availability of sweets to children.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »