WHITE HOUSE

Jack Welch: I Was Right to Question Jobs Numbers

Updated: October 10, 2012 | 7:36 a.m.
October 10, 2012 | 6:46 a.m.

Former General Electric Chairman Jack Welch continued to defend his skeptical response to the latest jobs report, saying that the 7.8 percent unemployment figure reported by the Labor Department last week is “downright implausible” in an op-ed out Wednesday in The Wall Street Journal.

Welch, who said the harsh response to his skepticism was something out of "Soviet Russia," does not directly accuse the Obama administration of tampering with the numbers, as he suggested in his initial response to the report on Twitter, but writes, “I doubt many of us know any businessperson who believes the economy is growing at breakneck speed, as it would have to be for unemployment to drop to 7.8% from 8.3% over the course of two months.”

Welch further writes, “I know I'm not the only person hearing these numbers and saying, ‘Really? If all that's true, why are so many people I know still having such a hard time finding work? Why do I keep hearing about local, state and federal cutbacks?’”

Welch acknowledges that his initial tweet (which read, "Unbelievable jobs numbers..these Chicago guys will do anything..can't debate so change numbers") was “somewhat incendiary,” and writes now that he should have “added a few question marks at the end…to make it clear I was raising a question.”

On Tuesday, Fortune magazine announced that Welch would no longer be writing for the magazine. Welch, according to Fortune, sent an email to editors there saying that he and his wife, Suzy, would be "terminating our contract" and will no longer be sending "material to Fortune."

Fortune Managing Editor Andy Serwer castigated Welch Tuesday on MSNBC, saying that he had a problem with his initial tweet, saying: "I think it's exactly the opposite of what Jack Welch is saying," adding that, "Things are actually improving." Also on Tuesday, Fortune posted an article on its website noting that "GE lost nearly 100,000 jobs while Welch was at the helm of the company." It was not long after that Welch sent his email saying he would no longer be writing for the magazine.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

7:33 a.m.

Latest Response by Michael Schmidt: Debate is Microcosm of Energy Policy

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

6:25 p.m.

Latest Response by Jack Rafuse: The LNG Export Conundrum: Dow Chemical

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:23 p.m.

Latest Response by Bernard L. Weinstein: Export more LNG to fight climate change

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »