WHITE HOUSE

Grassley Wants 'Open and Transparent' White House Review of Colombia Incident

Updated: May 2, 2012 | 9:21 p.m.
May 2, 2012 | 9:10 p.m.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, ranking member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is satisfied with the Secret Service response to his inquiries about alleged misconduct of Secret Service agents in Colombia, but wants a better response from the White House.

In an April 20 letter to Secret Service Director Mark Sullivan and Inspector General Charles Edwards, Grassley asked about additional details concerning overnight visitors and the involvement of White House communications and advance staff. Grassley has been one of the most outspoken lawmakers on the issue, which implicated 12 Secret Service members and 12 military service members in alleged misconduct during their stay in advance of President Obama's visit to Cartagena, Colombia last month. Just last week, Grassley said on CBS's This Morning he expects officials to be held accountable, and called for an independent investigation into the proceedings.

"You know nothing's changed in Washington if heads don't roll," he said.

Sullivan's May 1 answer to Grassley's letter said that, as far as the agency was aware, the agents involved had not leaked sensitive information.  Grassley released a redacted version of Sullivan's response today.

"The Secret Service has no information to suggest that sensitive information was compromised during the Colombia trip," it says, but cautions that "we would defer to the Department of  
Defense and the White House on matters related to their respective personnel."

The letter also reveals that the investigation, still under way, found that only one of the officers had an overnight guest -- a significant detail, as Grassley and other lawmakers have raised the possibility of overnight guests potentially drawing sensitive information out of agents and compromising the president's security.

Sullivan has briefed lawmakers on the ongoing investigation over the past few weeks, and Grassley said in a statement that he "appreciate[s] the Secret Service's transparency in response to Congress." But as Sullivan was unable to answer most of his questions surrounding White House personnel, Grassley said he was still hoping for more information from the White House.

"Since the Secret Service did not request the records of the White House personnel, an open and transparent response from the President's Counsel is even more imperative," he said.  "Unfortunately, more than a week after my inquiry, I've yet to hear from anybody at the White House."

An internal investigation at the White House revealed, according to White House Press Secretary Jay Carney, "no indication of any inappropriate behavior or misconduct" by White House staff.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:52 p.m.

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: Hold Your Horses

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

11:44 a.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: A Breath of Fresh Air

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

May 24, 2013

Latest Response by Brigham McCown: U.S. Lacks Coherent LNG Policy

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

No Wonder Republican Criticism of Obama Isn’t Working

May 23, 2013
They’re attacking the president where he’s least vulnerable at a time when they have minimal credibility.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Smaller Schools Aren’t Always Better

May 23, 2013
The universities best able to expand access to education are the ones with the most students.
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Parties Push For House Retirements

May 23, 2013
Campaign committees utilize scare tactics to pressure members to step aside.
More Columns »