WHITE HOUSE

Four Budget Developments You Need to Know

Updated: April 7, 2011 | 9:18 p.m.
April 7, 2011 | 2:29 p.m.

The White House is seen in the early evening. The president and congressional leaders are meeting over the budget Thursday night.

1. Getting to 50 percent. 

House Speaker John Boehner wants to get at least half of his conference to sign on to a bill to fund the government.

There are at least four factions within the House Republican Conference—though they overlap—against the bill as is. 
One, mainly the appropriators, is concerned with the level and type of defense spending. 
The second is concerned with the size of the cuts. They want Democrats to come much closer to the $62 billion in cuts that they’ve set. 
The third faction will accept fewer cuts in exchange for a rider turning over family-planning funding to states (and thus taking it away from Planned Parenthood). And the fourth is most concerned about reining in the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to regulate carbon emissions. From the standpoint of votes, these four factions merge into two: those who want more cuts and those who are concerned about the strength of the riders. The idea being: the lower the number of cuts, the tougher the riders, or the softer the riders, the higher the number.

Boehner worries that if he assents to a bill that does not pull a majority of Republicans on board, he'll lose his job, or his credibility, or his stature. It's in his interest to hold out until the very end.

(See a TIMELINE on how we got to this point in the budget negotiations.)

2. The White House is willing to give a little on numbers.

The Obama team is floating $35 billion in cuts today. The administration is portending doom if the government shuts down, having surrogates brief reporters on the consequences of having 800,000 people furloughed.

3. The White House thinks Boehner has to swallow his pride.

The Republican position is that the White House has to give in on a short-term extension so that Boehner can rally his troops and then accept more cuts. 

(Check out PICTURES of the budget negotiation cast of characters.)

4. The White House line as to why they won’t accept short-term resolutions:

They’ve come more than halfway, certainty is needed, and “this is not a way to run a government.” Also: the longer this goes on there's no telling how the politics of this conundrum will play out. 

(Take a look at a POLL that shows which party Insiders say would gain from CR compromise.)

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

5:16 p.m.

Latest Response by Phineas Baxandall: It's About Waste, Not Hate

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

3:19 p.m.

Latest Response by James Corless: Time to adapt to the new reality

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

11:51 a.m.

Latest Response by Bill Cooper: U.S. Should Quickly Approve Other Apps

More Expert Opinions »

Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

No Wonder Republican Criticism of Obama Isn’t Working

8:05 p.m.
They’re attacking the president where he’s least vulnerable at a time when they have minimal credibility.
Reid Wilson: On the Trail

Parties Push For House Retirements

May 23, 2013
Campaign committees utilize scare tactics to pressure members to step aside.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

May 22, 2013
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
More Columns »