SUNDAY SHOWS

Former Solicitor Generals: Parts of Arizona Immigration Law Could Fall

Starr and Katyal point to a provision making it illegal for undocumented immigrants to look for work.

Updated: April 8, 2012 | 11:46 a.m.
April 8, 2012 | 11:01 a.m.

Former solicitor generals from Republican and Democratic administrations agreed Sunday that the Supreme Court could strike parts of the controversial immigration law in Arizona.

Ken Starr, who served in the George H.W. Bush administration, and Neal Katyal, formerly of the Obama administration, both said the court is likely to rule unconstitutional  the parts of the law that make it a criminal offense for undocumented immigrants to look for work.

Starr said parts of the law are "quite problematic. And in particular, the provision with respect to individuals who are undocumented seeking work. Congress sought not to make that a crime, not to make that any kind of civil offense, to rather have a very important system of employer sanctions but not employee sanctions," Starr said, although he defended the law enforcement provisions as acceptable under the Constitution.

Katyal agreed, saying that Starr "nailed it on the head."

The Arizona immigration law, SB 1070, mandates that all immigrants carry their identifying documents at all times, requires that state officials determine a person's immigration status upon arrest, and creates new penalties for those hiring or aiding illegal immigrants. It has been attacked by Democrats and the Obama administration as being one of the most far-reaching and harshest immigration laws in the country, and the Supreme Court is set to hear oral arguments on its constitutionality on April 25.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

29 minutes ago

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
More Columns »