GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS

Federal Pay Losing Ground Compared With Private Sector, Report Finds

Updated: October 19, 2012 | 6:27 p.m.
October 19, 2012 | 6:12 p.m.

Government Executive is part of the National Journal Group Inc. and the Atlantic Media Company. From time to time, Government Executive and National Journal will share content and collaborate on features and events.

The pay gap between government employees and private-sector workers grew by about 8 percent this year in favor of private-sector workers, the Federal Salary Council announced on Friday.

FSC, which assesses the locality pay program annually, concluded that federal employees earn 34.6 percent less pay on average than their private-sector counterparts. In 2011, that number was 26.3 percent.

The council attributes the growing gap to the continued federal pay freeze as well as a new formula the Bureau of Labor Statistics uses to track employment and salary figures.

Jacqueline Simon, public policy director for the American Federation of Government Employees and a member of the Federal Salary Council, said the new measure is more comprehensive in that it includes more occupations and localities. The results, she said, show a need to increase federal salaries.

“There is an undeniable pay gap in favor of the private sector and it should absolutely be addressed,” she told Government Executive.

The report conflicts with some other studies that show federal employees earn more than those in the private sector. A Government Accountability Office study in July concluded there is no definitive way to measure any potential gap. 

The National Treasury Employees Union said in a statement that the other studies are from partisan think tanks and rely on “flawed data.” Only the FSC report should be trusted, it said.

“This apples-to-apples comparison, which compares the predominantly white-collar federal workforce with similar private-sector positions, consistently has shown a pay gap in favor of the private sector,” the union said.

In calling for an end to the federal pay freeze, NTEU added that the study indicates Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney’s plan for the federal workforce is ill-advised.

“These findings reinforce the flawed approach of Gov. Mitt Romney, who has called for cutting federal compensation by 30 to 40 percent, while his running mate Rep. Paul Ryan drafted a budget resolution that would freeze federal pay through 2015,” the union said. “All of this despite the fact that federal workers have already contributed more than $75 billion to deficit reduction and economic recovery through the pay freeze and increased pension contributions.”

President Obama has recommended a 0.5 percent increase in federal salaries, but recently signed a six-month continuing resolution that extended the pay freeze.

Joseph Beaudoin, president of the National Active and Retired Federal Employees Association, said the rising gap between public and private salaries will lead to a less qualified workforce.

“When it comes to the important jobs these men and women do for America, we can't afford a second-rate workforce,” he said in a statement. “Yet that's what's in store for us if we continue to devalue our federal workers."

The council recommended adding 12 new locality pay areas. They are: Albany, N.Y.; Albuquerque, N.M.; Austin, Texas; Charlotte, N.C.; Colorado Springs, Colo.; Davenport, Iowa; Harrisburg, Pa.; Laredo, Texas; Las Vegas; Palm Bay, Fla.; St. Louis; and Tuscon, Ariz.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »