BUDGET

Debt-Ceiling Deadline Might Not Really Be August 2

Updated: July 27, 2011 | 2:44 p.m.
July 27, 2011 | 12:18 p.m.

The August 2 debt-ceiling deadline might not be as firm as the White House has insisted it is. 

The New York Times reports that the date after which the U.S. will be unable to pay its bills may, in fact, be August 10. How so?

Even though the Treasury will not be statutorily permitted to borrow more to pay its bills on August 2, the federal government would have enough cash on hand to pay debts until August 10, according to estimates from Wall Street banks and a Washington research organization, The Times says.

After August 10, Washington would not be able to write millions of checks. Still, the administration has insisted that August 2 is a firm deadline. 

"There are no off-ramps. People keep looking for off-ramps," White House press secretary Jay Carney said on Wednesday. 

If the deadline can be moved by eight days, the extra time might buy the parties in Congress and the White House some breathing room to negotiate an increase in the debt limit after weeks of struggling to come to agreement. But it's unclear what effect further delay might have on the United States' credit rating. 

Asked what would happen if the United States did not raise the debt ceiling, Carney argued that the government would face some difficult choices; but he reiterated the White House position that the limit would be increased. 

"Who do you save? Who do you pay?" he said. 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Oops! Judge Slams Local Public-Private Deal

7:05 p.m.

Latest Response by Robert L. Darbelnet: Public Scrutiny Essential

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 17, 2013

Latest Response by Jack Gerard: Minor Policies, Major Consequences

Energy Experts

Should Washington Go Small on Energy and Climate Policy?

May 16, 2013

Latest Response by Jonathan Silver: Woefully Little, Better Than Nothing

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »