WHITE HOUSE

Carney: A Penalty, Not a Tax in Health Care Law

June 29, 2012 | 2:14 p.m.

The White House, on the day after the Supreme Court based its validation of health care reform on the government’s taxing power, is aggressively fighting back against Republican claims that Obamacare contains a tax increase. Press Secretary Jay Carney insisted on Friday that the law imposes a penalty – not a tax – and that it will be paid only by those who choose that option. And, he added, no matter what you call it, it is modeled after what Republican Mitt Romney did when he was governor of Massachusetts.

“You can call it what you want,” Carney told reporters en route to Colorado where the president was to view the battle against raging wildfires. “If you read the opinion, it is not a broad-based tax. It affects one percent, by CBO estimates, of the population.”  Pressed on whether that 1 percent will be paying a tax or a penalty, he responded, “It’s a penalty because you have a choice. You don’t a have a choice to pay your taxes. You have a choice. If you can afford health insurance, if you don’t buy it.”

Specifically citing the court’s opinion, he said, “With regard to the penalty as was discussed by Chief Justice Roberts in his opinion, for those who could afford health insurance but choose to remain uninsured -- forcing the rest of us to pay for their care -- a penalty is administered as part of the Affordable Care Act.”

He added, “It is important to remember that the penalty… is modeled exactly on the penalty that exists in the health care reform that was promoted and signed into law by Governor Romney in Massachusetts.”

Republicans, of course, see it differently and have been pounding on the tax issue ever since the court ruled. Rush Limbaugh contended the law contains “the largest tax increase in the history of the world.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Expert Opinions
Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

10:43 p.m.

Latest Response by Gabriel Roth: But do we not drive to save time?

Energy Experts

What's at Stake with Natural-Gas Exports?

4:49 p.m.

Latest Response by Dave McCurdy: Natural Gas Market Will Find Balance

Transportation Experts

Do We Suddenly Hate Driving?

4:24 p.m.

Latest Response by Keith Laughlin: We Need a New Policy for a New Day

More Expert Opinions »
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
More Columns »