Obama to Russia and E.U.: ‘This Is Not Another Cold War That We’re Entering Into’

But the president did spend much of his major speech hitting back at Putin.

President Obama delivers a speech at the Palais des Beaux-Arts (Palace of Fine Arts - BOZAR) in Brussels on March 26, 2014.
National Journal
Matt Berman
March 26, 2014, 10:25 a.m.

In a Wed­nes­day speech at the European Uni­on sum­mit in Brus­sels, Pres­id­ent Obama strongly re­af­firmed his com­mit­ment to Ukraine and re­peated his warn­ing to Rus­sia to push no farther in­to the coun­try. The U.S., Europe, and its part­ners “have isol­ated Rus­sia polit­ic­ally,” the pres­id­ent said, and “are im­pos­ing costs through sanc­tions that have left a mark on Rus­sia and those ac­count­able for its ac­tions.”

If Vladi­mir Putin and Rus­sia stay on their course, Obama said, “we will en­sure that this isol­a­tion deep­ens.”

At the same time, the pres­id­ent at­temp­ted to push back against the nar­rat­ive that the Crimea con­flict has brought U.S. and Rus­si­an re­la­tions back to the 20th cen­tury.

“This is not an­oth­er Cold War that we’re en­ter­ing in­to,” Obama said. “After all, un­like the So­viet Uni­on, Rus­sia leads no bloc of na­tions. No glob­al ideo­logy. The United States and NATO do not seek any con­flict with Rus­sia.”

Obama also kicked back at sev­er­al of Putin’s stated reas­ons for an­nex­ing Crimea. For starters, “there is no evid­ence, nev­er has been, of sys­tem­ic vi­ol­ence against eth­nic Rus­si­ans in­side of Ukraine,” Obama said. Rus­sia is not act­ing like the West did in Kosovo, as Putin has claimed. NATO only in­ter­vened in Kosovo after the coun­try’s people “were sys­tem­at­ic­ally killed and bru­tal­ized for years,” Obama said.

And Amer­ica’s in­vove­ment in Ir­aq isn’t a pre­ced­ent for Rus­si­an ac­tion, either. “We did not claim or an­nex Ir­aq’s ter­rit­ory,” Obama said. “We did not grab its re­sources for our own gain.” Obama did not, however, launch in­to a staunch de­fense of the U.S.’s war in Ir­aq, say­ing in­stead that Amer­ica and Europe don’t “claim to be the sole ar­bit­er of what is right and wrong in the world,” but that “part of what makes us dif­fer­ent is that we wel­come cri­ti­cism.”

Obama also called it “ab­surd” for Putin or oth­ers to sug­gest that “Amer­ica is some­how con­spir­ing with fas­cists out­side of Ukraine or fail­ing to re­spect the Rus­si­an people.” Just be­cause Rus­sia and Ukraine share a close his­tory “does not mean [Rus­sia] should be able to dic­tate Ukraine’s fu­ture.”

But the pres­id­ent wasn’t just speak­ing to Putin in his ad­dress. “I know it may seem easy to see these events as re­moved from our lives … dis­tant from con­cerns closer to home,” he said. “There will al­ways be voices who say that what hap­pens in the wider world is not our con­cern, nor our re­spons­ib­il­ity.” He con­tin­ued:

But we must nev­er for­get that we are heirs to a struggle for free­dom. Our demo­cracy, our in­di­vidu­al op­por­tun­ity only ex­ists be­cause those who came be­fore us had the wis­dom and the cour­age to re­cog­nize that ideals will only en­dure if we see our self-in­terest in the suc­cess of oth­er peoples and oth­er na­tions. Now is not the time to bluster. The situ­ation in Ukraine, like crises in many parts of the world, does not have easy an­swers. Nor a mil­it­ary solu­tion. But at this mo­ment, we must meet the chal­lenge to our ideas, to our very in­ter­na­tion­al or­der with strength and con­vic­tion.

Obama’s not talk­ing about a fic­tion­al group of un­con­cerned Amer­ic­ans here. Re­cent polling shows that a ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans don’t think the U.S. should get “too in­volved” in Ukraine, with only 29 per­cent of re­spond­ents say­ing the U.S. should take a “firm stand” against Rus­sia.

It won’t be so easy to change a slew of minds on this. But, at least ac­cord­ing to Obama, the crisis in Ukraine poses a vi­tal ques­tion worth an­swer­ing.

What kind of Europe, what kind of Amer­ica, what kind of world will we leave be­hind? And I be­lieve that if we hold firm to our prin­ciples and are will­ing to back our be­liefs with cour­age and re­solve, then hope will ul­ti­mately over­come fear, and free­dom will con­tin­ue to tri­umph over tyranny. Be­cause that is what forever stirs in the hu­man heart.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×