Why There Won’t Be a ‘Three Amigos’ Summit This Time Around

Obama will meet with his Mexican and Canadian counterparts, but don’t expect a lot of hugs.

National Journal
George E. Condon Jr.
Feb. 18, 2014, 12:26 a.m.

When Pres­id­ent Obama flies to Mex­ico on Wed­nes­day to meet with his North Amer­ic­an coun­ter­parts, he’ll be re­viv­ing a con­tin­ent­al lead­ers’ meet­ing that George W. Bush en­vi­sioned as an an­nu­al event when he hos­ted the first one in 2005. That one went so well it was dubbed the “Three Ami­gos Sum­mit.” Then-Mex­ic­an Pres­id­ent Vi­cente Fox praised Bush, say­ing he had “mastered the tra­di­tion­al male hug of Mex­ic­an cul­ture, the ab­razo.”

But Obama is not really the hug­ging kind. And he, Mex­ic­an Pres­id­ent En­rique Peña Ni­eto, and Ca­na­dian Prime Min­is­ter Steph­en Harp­er are not really act­ing much like ami­gos these days. So don’t ex­pect a lot of ab­razos dur­ing Obama’s time in Tolu­ca, the cap­it­al of the state of Mex­ico, about 40 miles south­w­est of Mex­ico City. There are prob­lems among the lead­ers of the con­tin­ent’s three coun­tries.

Wash­ing­ton is dis­pleased that Peña Ni­eto blocked most of the Amer­ic­an se­cur­ity co­oper­a­tion after he took of­fice a little more than a year ago and is con­cerned about the con­tin­ued high levels of vi­ol­ent crime and kid­nap­pings in Mex­ico. Mex­ico City is dis­pleased that Obama has failed to push through im­mig­ra­tion re­form in the United States. And Ot­t­awa is dis­pleased that Obama has taken five years to make up his mind on its pro­posed Key­stone XL pipeline in­to the United States with still no de­cision in sight. Fur­ther set­ting the at­mo­sphere for the one-day sum­mit, Mex­ico is dis­pleased with Ca­na­dian visa policy, and the two coun­tries cur­rently have what Duncan Wood, dir­ect­or of the Mex­ico In­sti­tute at the Wilson Cen­ter, calls “rather frosty re­la­tions.” There are, said Wood, “a num­ber of ten­sions which have emerged among all the coun­tries,” not­ing un­hap­pi­ness by the oth­er lead­ers at the NSA rev­el­a­tions as well as on­go­ing trade dis­putes.

The sched­ule calls for Obama to meet sep­ar­ately with Peña Ni­eto soon after ar­riv­ing in the Mex­ic­an pres­id­ent’s ho­met­own. Then, after a lunch with both of the oth­er lead­ers, the U.S. pres­id­ent will have what the White House is call­ing a “walk and talk” with Harp­er. That will be fol­lowed by a ses­sion with busi­ness lead­ers and ex­perts on North Amer­ica. Then, the three lead­ers will sit down for the ac­tu­al sum­mit meet­ing and a con­clud­ing press con­fer­ence where the lead­ers are ex­pec­ted to be pressed on the dif­fer­ences they want to keep out of pub­lic view.

Com­ing on the 20th an­niversary of the North Amer­ic­an Free Trade Agree­ment, the White House sees this sum­mit as a nat­ur­al for­um for dis­cuss­ing the next step in trade — the on­go­ing ne­go­ti­ations of the Trans-Pa­cific Part­ner­ship. Both Canada and Mex­ico have joined the TPP talks in the last two years. “We are ob­vi­ously at a crit­ic­al point in work­ing to­wards fi­nal­iz­ing an am­bi­tious trade agree­ment “¦ that would en­com­pass roughly 40 per­cent of the glob­al eco­nomy in the TPP coun­tries,” a seni­or U.S. of­fi­cial said last week, call­ing the talks “an op­por­tun­ity to build on the work that was done in NAF­TA by in­tro­du­cing ad­di­tion­al stand­ards,”

What Ca­na­dian news­pa­pers have called the “drift” apart of Harp­er and Obama could make this the first North Amer­ic­an Lead­ers Sum­mit at which Amer­ic­an fric­tion with Canada threatens to over­shad­ow the usu­ally dom­in­ant dif­fer­ences between Wash­ing­ton and Mex­ico City. But that would re­quire Harp­er to do something no Ca­na­dian lead­er has done since Prime Min­is­ter Pierre Trudeau used to be­dev­il Pres­id­ent Re­agan. So Obama and Harp­er most likely will keep their dif­fer­ences out of pub­lic view.

“Canada has been very frus­trated over the years that the Key­stone de­cision has been put off, delayed,” said Joshua Meltzer, an ex­pert on glob­al trade at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion. He ex­pects Harp­er “to push a little bit” to get Obama to move faster now that the State De­part­ment has is­sued its find­ings on the cli­mate im­pact of the pipeline. But Ar­turo Sarukhan, the former Mex­ic­an am­bas­sad­or to the United States who helped pre­pare sev­er­al of the pre­vi­ous Three Ami­gos sum­mits, said the is­sue “will not pop up” in the form­al talks among the three lead­ers.

“As someone who spent the past six years sort of or­gan­iz­ing and prep­ping for these tri­lat­er­al sum­mits, you usu­ally try to pre­vent the bi­lat­er­al agenda from seep­ing in­to the tri­lat­er­al “¦ be­cause it de­tracts from the more glob­al, hol­ist­ic North Amer­ic­an dis­cus­sions,” said Sarukhan. He said Key­stone is one of those is­sues that “you tend to try and push to the side­lines.”

U.S. of­fi­cials in­sist the pres­id­ent will tell Harp­er ex­actly what he has been say­ing in pub­lic — that the pro­cess has to play out. “What Pres­id­ent Obama will do is ex­plain to him where we are in the re­view of the Key­stone pipeline, and in­dic­ate that we’ll of course let our Ca­na­dian friends know when we’ve ar­rived at a de­cision,” said the seni­or ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cial.

“Key­stone is one of those things where every­body sort of knows every­body’s po­s­i­tion ex­cept for the pres­id­ent’s,” said An­drew Finn, an as­so­ci­ate at the Canada In­sti­tute. “It is no secret what the prime min­is­ter’s thoughts are on the pipeline. And I don’t know what value there is to bring it up in this type of for­um. So my guess would be that it doesn’t.”

The same be­hind-closed-doors fate likely awaits and can­did dis­cus­sion between Obama and Peña Ni­eto on U.S. im­mig­ra­tion policy and Mex­ico’s in­ab­il­ity to halt the blood­shed of the drug car­tels. The private se­cur­ity dis­cus­sion may be in­tense, though, re­flect­ing Amer­ic­an un­hap­pi­ness with Peña Ni­eto’s de­cision to scale back U.S. as­sist­ance. “The frus­tra­tion on se­cur­ity is­sues “¦ is sort of un­der­ly­ing and bub­bling un­der­neath,” said Vanda Fel­bab-Brown, a seni­or fel­low at Brook­ings. She said she ex­pects it to bet “very little at­ten­tion and pub­lic play” in the pub­lic com­ments at Tolu­ca. But, she said, “it will be in the back­ground. It’s a very im­port­ant un­re­solved and dif­fi­cult is­sue even if the lead­ers” is­sue pub­lic state­ments on more up­beat is­sues.

Obama and Peña Ni­eto will also, of course, talk about the status of im­mig­ra­tion re­form. But that dis­cus­sion is likely to be more pro forma. Peña Ni­eto already knows the an­swers and already un­der­stands why Obama has failed to push through the re­forms he has ad­voc­ated throughout his pres­id­ency.

Pub­licly, ex­pect to hear praise from Obama for re­forms pushed through by Peña Ni­eto, end­ing the state mono­poly on the en­ergy in­dustry, over­haul­ing edu­ca­tion and tax policy. The Mex­ico In­sti­tute’s Wood said Peña Ni­eto wants to make this sum­mit his show to high­light what he has done in his one year in of­fice. It’s “really go­ing to be a show­case for Pres­id­ent Peña Ni­eto to high­light the fact that Mex­ico has emerged as a strong re­gion­al part­ner that is look­ing to get equal treat­ment and due re­spect from the oth­er North Amer­ic­an coun­tries.”

That calls, of course, for at least a few ab­razos, though they may be less en­thu­si­ast­ic than those demon­strated by Bush and Fox at that 2005 sum­mit in Waco. And that’s why, pub­licly at least, the lead­ers will put on a friendly and cor­di­al face and keep the ser­i­ous fric­tions out of sight.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×