Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Health Care Ruling: Experts Discuss Outcome of High Court's Decision Health Care Ruling: Experts Discuss Outcome of High Court's Decision

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



Health Care Ruling: Experts Discuss Outcome of High Court's Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the health care reform law on Thursday, ending--at least temporarily--a battle over the controversial statute that served as a backdrop for most of President Obama’s incumbency. We’ve asked some of our Perspectives contributors, a diverse collection of think tanks, advocates, and leaders in their fields, as well as several other experts to tell us what they think of the ruling.

Here’s what they had to say.

Asian American Justice Center

Mee Moua, president and executive director of the AAJC, said in a statement that she applauded the decision, calling it “critical in ensuring that communities of color have access to health care and key preventative services.”

“Our task at hand is to spearhead and move forward with implementing this law, so that the 2.5 million Asian-Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders will have affordable health insurance, eliminating the current health disparities that plague our communities.”

“While we welcome today's decision that brings us one step closer to health equity in this country, we cannot forget the Supreme Court's ruling, just three days ago, in the Arizona anti-immigrant law, which will likely lead to discrimination against communities of color. These important debates reinforce the need for our communities to act and make our voices heard, loud and clear."


Asian & Pacific Islander American Health Forum

Kathy Lim Ko, president and CEO of the APIAHF, said that the Supreme Court’s ruling “validated a landmark civil-rights law.” The APIAHF is an advocacy organization promoting policy and community programs that benefit the health of Asian-Americans and Pacific Islanders.

“The ACA will improve access to quality health care for millions of Asian-Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders, protect our communities from unfair insurance company practices, and make substantial investments in our nation’s public health infrastructure,” she said in a statement.

“We know that the work ahead is still significant, and we must continue to fight to ensure that all people--including our nation’s immigrants--have the right to health and health care. We will continue to analyze today’s decision in more detail and work to defend the ACA against continued attempts to repeal the advances that have been made.”

Center for American Progress

Neera Tandeen, president of the Center for American Progress, an educational institute and think tank, called the ruling a “victory for millions of Americans who are already benefiting from the health reform law.”

“It’s not about Democrats or Republicans winning or losing, it's about people’s lives. All of us—Democrats and Republicans—must move forward with making health care work for every American, and that means stopping the political games and implementing the law,” she said in a statement.

Tandeen called for an end to the partisan battle over the act, adding in her statement, “But will Republicans stop their politics-at-all-costs campaign long enough to make sure America’s health care system works for every American?”

“No more slash-and-burn politics. No more delay tactics. Republican attorney generals have wasted millions of dollars using the courts to achieve their political ends. Today the Court affirmed its role as the neutral arbiter of the law for all Americans.”


GOProud, a gay and straight alliance promoting conservative ideals, criticized the Court’s ruling, saying the decision gives the federal government “unchecked power.”

“Today is a good day for big government and a bad day for individual liberty,” Jimmy LaSalvia, executive director of GOProud, said in a statement.

He continued: “This decision reminds us of how important it is to elect conservatives to the House, Senate, and the White House that will protect our individual liberties, because it is clear that the Supreme Court is unwilling to do so.”

“Free market health care reform would expand access to domestic-partner benefits and put gay people in charge of their health care decisions. By upholding 'Obamacare,' the Supreme Court has upheld legislation that hurts all Americans, but especially hurts gay and lesbian families.”


Hispanic Leadership Network

The Hispanic Leadership Network, an American Action Network initiative to engage the Hispanic community on center-right issues, released a statement from Executive Director Jennifer Korn.

Korn maintained that the Supreme Court’s decision would ultimately hurt Latinos and the American public, especially in light of the faltering economy. She called on Congress to work on a bipartisan solution that would replace the key provisions of the health care act to create “quality and affordable health care while protecting future generations from a mountain of debt.”

“In its opinion, the Court shed light on the truth--that Obamacare is, in fact, a one trillion dollar tax-hike imposed on the American people,” she said. "A federal mandate is not what the American people need or want to improve our health care system. Simply because something is deemed constitutional, it doesn’t mean it is good policy.”

“This law endangers quality private coverage for families, while robbing $500 billion from seniors to help pay for it. As it stands, this law puts the financial security of countless Hispanic families at risk and irresponsibly places the burden of debt on our children and grandchildren--jeopardizing the American dream.”

comments powered by Disqus