Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Supporters of Arizona’s Immigration Law Pleased With Supreme Court’s Questions Supporters of Arizona’s Immigration Law Pleased With Supreme Court...

This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

The Next America - Immigration 2012 / THE NEXT AMERICA

Supporters of Arizona’s Immigration Law Pleased With Supreme Court’s Questions

photo of Stephanie Czekalinski
April 25, 2012

As reports on the Supreme Court’s hearing on immigration trickled out of the courtroom, proponents and opponents of Arizona’s immigration bill, known as SB 1070, reacted quickly.

It appears that the justices weren’t sympathetic to the federal government’s argument that state police officers would violate federal immigration jurisdiction if they checked the status of someone they pull over. 

The questions lead to speculation at the law, at least in some part, may be allowed to stand. 

 

Organizations on both side of the debate were quick to weigh in after the hearing. The American Civil Liberties Union issued a statement stressing the need to stop SB 1070 and similar laws, because they “encourage racial profiling, harm public safety and lead to civil rights abuses.”

“The justices heard compelling argument for why they should strike down a law that lays waste to some of our most cherished American values-- freedom from unnecessary police intrusion and equality for all people, regardless of how they look or sound,” said Anthony D. Romero, executive director of the ACLU.

Angelica Salas of the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights based in Los Angeles called Arizona’s law “myopic, opaque, and divisive. CHIRLA expects the law to be struck down."

SB 1070 supporters had other expectations.

The Federation for American Immigration Reform, a Washington-based nonprofit that opposes illegal immigrant and advocates a reduction in legal immigration to the country, said that Arizona “established compelling legal arguments in support of the state and local governments’ authority to enforce federal immigration laws.”

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach, who helped write SB 1070, was pleased with the Court’s line of questioning.  “This was a very good day for Arizona in the Supreme Court today,” he told Fox News. “The U.S. Justice Department was on the ropes.”

Click here to read the transcript of hearings. 

More The Next America - Immigration 2012
Job Board
Search Jobs
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Structural Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | New Haven, CT
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Quality Systems Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Greensboro, NC
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Senior Water Resource Project Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers | Fairfax, VA
Civil Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Steamboat Springs, CO
Entry Level Geotechnical Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Albany, NY
Sales Engineer-Process Automation/Instrumentation
American Society of Civil Engineers
Senior Project Manager- Transportation
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Antonio, TX
Materials Engineer 2
American Society of Civil Engineers | IL
Land Surveyor
American Society of Civil Engineers
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus