Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Reveal Navigation

Lindsey Graham Isn't Sure If Bloggers Deserve 'First Amendment Protection' Lindsey Graham Isn't Sure If Bloggers Deserve 'First Amendment Pr... Lindsey Graham Isn't Sure If Bloggers Deserve 'First Amendment Protect... Lindsey Graham Isn't Sure...

share
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Tech

Lindsey Graham Isn't Sure If Bloggers Deserve 'First Amendment Protection'

Of course they do. But the question at hand is whether a media shield law should protect them as well.

(AP Photo/Matt York)

photo of Brian Fung
June 5, 2013

Whether bloggers count as journalists has mostly been a matter of esoterics for reporter types. But as Congress weighs a media shield law in response to the Associated Press/Justice Department subpoena scandal, the question is gaining an urgency that lawmakers are finding hard to ignore as they turn to writing the bill.

Speaking to reporters Tuesday, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., took on the issue—and stumbled.

"Who is a journalist is a question we need to ask ourselves," he said. "Is any blogger out there saying anything—do they deserve First Amendment protection? These are the issues of our times."

 

The verbal slipup aside (of course bloggers are covered under the Bill of Rights!), Graham's riffing on constitutional law exposes one of the age-old tensions between journalism as a product and journalism as an activity. What Graham really meant to ask was whether bloggers deserve the specific protections of the First Amendment that are granted to the press. And in fact, along with his colleague Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., Graham has been an ardent proponent of a media shield law in recent weeks. But as the line between blogger and journalist has blurred, a far more relevant challenge is figuring out whether those protections apply to the behavior of finding and passing on (sometimes secret) information, or if they apply only to people with little plastic ID badges to prove their affiliation.

In some ways, what this episode really suggests is that it might be time to retire the word "blogger" as an artifact of the aughts.

Update: 

Get us in your feed.
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus