Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Reveal Navigation

Goodlatte: Antitrust Laws Better Than 'Heavy-Handed' FCC Internet Rules Goodlatte: Antitrust Laws Better Than 'Heavy-Handed' FCC Internet... Goodlatte: Antitrust Laws Better Than 'Heavy-Handed' FCC Internet Rule... Goodlatte: Antitrust Laws...

share
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Technology / TECHNOLOGY

Goodlatte: Antitrust Laws Better Than 'Heavy-Handed' FCC Internet Rules

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski, seen here speaking about new net neutrality rules in December, found himself discussing them on Thursday before the House Judiciary Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet Subcommittee. Panel Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., is determined to give Congress the last word on the subject.(Getty Images)

May 5, 2011

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski faced a familiar grilling on Thursday by House members of Congress who asserted that antitrust laws would be a better way than FCC regulations to prevent Internet service providers from blocking legal content.

That FCC’s net neutrality order “circumvents Congress’s lawmaking authority and will stifle innovation in a morass of bureaucratic rules,” said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet.

“And make no mistake: the Open Internet Order exceeds the FCC’s power. Congress has never given the FCC the authority to impose this sort of top-down regulation of Internet services.”

 

Thursday’s hearing rehashed some older arguments over net neutrality, but with a focus on other potential fixes. Goodlatte argued that antitrust laws, especially if tweaked by Congress, are better suited to reducing anticompetitive behavior online.

“Rather than a heavy-handed regulatory approach crafted by the FCC, I believe a light-touch, antitrust-based approach will best protect a competitive, innovative, and open Internet,” Goodlatte said. “Antitrust law provides a time-tested and predictable system for preventing providers from engaging in anticompetitive blocking or discrimination.”

Last month, the House voted to repeal the FCC rules passed in December, which have yet to go into effect. Goodlatte said that vote did not end Congress’s effort to protect the Internet, and he promised more hearings on the issue.

Genachowski defended the regulations as offering a “sensible, high-level” approach that enjoys “broad support” from stakeholders. He asserted that the agency’s rules are actually better suited to the dynamic Internet marketplace than using antitrust laws.

“Some people think the framework we adopted doesn’t go far enough, and others think it goes too far. I believe it gets it right,” Genachowski said.

Republican FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell joined Genachowski at the witness table and also pushed back against any new antitrust laws, but for a different reason.

“Nothing is broken in the broadband Internet access market that needs fixing,” said McDowell, who voted against the net neutrality rules. He said he favors an approach that uses nongovernmental organizations to help preserve Internet openness.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., shared McDowell’s view and said the FCC has yet to prove that Internet monopolies are hurting consumers.

“I know monopolies when I see one,” Issa said.

“Please give me a break, somebody,” retorted Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich. “Let’s not start this conversation off this morning with 'everything is OK.' It’s far from OK.”

Want the news first every morning? Sign up for National Journal’s Need-to-Know Memo. Short items to prepare you for the day.

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski faced a familiar grilling Thursday, as congressional lawmakers asserted that antitrust laws would be a better way to prevent Internet service providers from blocking legal content.

That FCC’s net neutrality regulation “circumvents Congress’s lawmaking authority and will stifle innovation in a morass of bureaucratic rules,” said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet Subcommittee. “And make no mistake: the Open Internet Order exceeds the FCC’s power.  Congress has never given the FCC the authority to impose this sort of top-down regulation of internet services.”

Thursday’s hearing largely rehashed traditional arguments over net neutrality, but with a focus on other potential fixes. Goodlatte argued that antitrust laws, especially if tweaked by Congress, are better suited to reducing anticompetitive behavior online.

“Rather than a heavy-handed regulatory approach crafted by the FCC, I believe a light-touch, antitrust-based approach will best protect a competitive, innovative, and open internet,” he said. “Antitrust law provides a time-tested and predictable system for preventing providers from engaging in anticompetitive blocking or discrimination.”

Last month the House voted to repeal the FCC’s rules, which were passed in December and have yet to go into effect. Goodlatte said that vote did not end Congress’s effort to protect the Internet and he promised more hearings on the issue.

Genachowski defended the regulations as a “sensible, high-level” approach which enjoys “broad support” from stakeholders. While Goodlatte insisted that antitrust laws would be less heavy-handed, the FCC chairman asserted that the agency’s rules are actually better suited to the dynamic Internet marketplace.

“Some people think the framework we adopted doesn’t go far enough, and others think it goes too far. I believe it gets it right,” Genachowski said.

Republican FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell joined Genachowski at the witness table and also pushed back against new antitrust laws, but for a diff

Federal Communications Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski faced a familiar grilling Thursday, as congressional lawmakers asserted that antitrust laws would be a better way to prevent Internet service providers from blocking legal content.

That FCC’s net neutrality regulation “circumvents Congress’s lawmaking authority and will stifle innovation in a morass of bureaucratic rules,” said Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., chairman of the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Intellectual Property, Competition, and the Internet Subcommittee. “And make no mistake: the Open Internet Order exceeds the FCC’s power.  Congress has never given the FCC the authority to impose this sort of top-down regulation of internet services.”

Thursday’s hearing largely rehashed traditional arguments over net neutrality, but with a focus on other potential fixes. Goodlatte argued that antitrust laws, especially if tweaked by Congress, are better suited to reducing anticompetitive behavior online.

“Rather than a heavy-handed regulatory approach crafted by the FCC, I believe a light-touch, antitrust-based approach will best protect a competitive, innovative, and open internet,” he said. “Antitrust law provides a time-tested and predictable system for preventing providers from engaging in anticompetitive blocking or discrimination.”

Last month the House voted to repeal the FCC’s rules, which were passed in December and have yet to go into effect. Goodlatte said that vote did not end Congress’s effort to protect the Internet and he promised more hearings on the issue.

Genachowski defended the regulations as a “sensible, high-level” approach which enjoys “broad support” from stakeholders. While Goodlatte insisted that antitrust laws would be less heavy-handed, the FCC chairman asserted that the agency’s rules are actually better suited to the dynamic Internet marketplace.

“Some people think the framework we adopted doesn’t go far enough, and others think it goes too far. I believe it gets it right,” Genachowski said.

Republican FCC Commissioner Robert McDowell joined Genachowski at the witness table and also pushed back against new antitrust laws, but for a different reason.

“Nothing is broken in the broadband Internet access market that needs fixing,” said McDowell, who voted against the FCC net neutrality rules. He said he favors an approach based on non-governmental organizations to help preserve Internet openness.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., shared McDowell’s view and said the FCC has yet to prove that Internet monopolies are hurting consumers.

“I know monopolies when I see one… The finding of a monopoly or duopoly does not exist,” he said.

That view is shared by many conservatives t but that was a hard argument to swallow for some lawmakers on the panel.

“Please give me a break somebody,” said Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich. “Let’s not start this conversation off this morning with everything is OK. It’s far from OK.”

erent reason.

“Nothing is broken in the broadband Internet access market that needs fixing,” said McDowell, who voted against the FCC net neutrality rules. He said he favors an approach based on non-governmental organizations to help preserve Internet openness.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., shared McDowell’s view and said the FCC has yet to prove that Internet monopolies are hurting consumers.

“I know monopolies when I see one… The finding of a monopoly or duopoly does not exist,” he said.

That view is shared by many conservatives t but that was a hard argument to swallow for some lawmakers on the panel.

“Please give me a break somebody,” said Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich. “Let’s not start this conversation off this morning with everything is OK. It’s far from OK.”

Get us in your feed.
More Technology
 
Comments
comments powered by Disqus