A Bill to Ban Internet ‘Fast Lanes’ Won’t Pass. But Here’s Why It Still Matters.

The FCC faces increasing pressure to ban paid prioritization of Internet traffic.

National Journal
Brendan Sasso
June 17, 2014, 12:15 p.m.

A Demo­crat­ic bill to ban “fast lanes” on the In­ter­net isn’t go­ing to be­come law.

Re­pub­lic­ans have long op­posed net-neut­ral­ity reg­u­la­tions, and as long as they con­trol the House, they’ll block le­gis­la­tion that would re­strict the busi­ness choices of In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders.

But the On­line Com­pet­i­tion and Con­sumer Choice Act, in­tro­duced Tues­day by Sen. Patrick Leahy and Rep. Dor­is Mat­sui, isn’t really about chan­ging the law. It’s about send­ing a mes­sage to the Fed­er­al Com­mu­nic­a­tions Com­mis­sion.

“We put forth the bill to put in­creased pres­sure on the FCC to ban paid-pri­or­it­iz­a­tion agree­ments,” an aide to a bill sup­port­er ex­plained.

Net neut­ral­ity is the prin­ciple that all In­ter­net traffic should be treated equally. The FCC first en­acted net-neut­ral­ity rules in 2010 that barred In­ter­net ser­vice pro­viders from block­ing any web­sites or from “un­reas­on­ably” dis­crim­in­at­ing against any traffic.

A fed­er­al court struck those rules down earli­er this year, and now FCC Chair­man Tom Wheel­er is try­ing to re­write them in a way that can sur­vive fu­ture court chal­lenges. His pro­pos­al would still bar In­ter­net pro­viders from block­ing web­sites but would al­low pro­viders to charge sites for faster ser­vice as long as the agree­ments are “com­mer­cially reas­on­able.”

In­ter­net act­iv­ists, ma­jor Web com­pan­ies such as Google, and many Demo­crats on Cap­it­ol Hill fear that change could cre­ate a two-tiered In­ter­net that be­ne­fits the richest cor­por­a­tions and lim­its free speech.

“Amer­ic­ans are speak­ing loud and clear — they want an In­ter­net that is a plat­form for free ex­pres­sion and in­nov­a­tion, where the best ideas and ser­vices can reach con­sumers based on mer­it rather than based on a fin­an­cial re­la­tion­ship with a broad­band pro­vider,” Leahy, the chair­man of the Sen­ate Ju­di­ciary Com­mit­tee, said in a state­ment.

The FCC has been flooded by thou­sands of out­raged com­ments in re­cent weeks op­pos­ing the “fast lane” pro­pos­al.

Chris­toph­er Lewis, a lob­by­ist for the con­sumer-ad­vocacy group Pub­lic Know­ledge, said the bill is sig­ni­fic­ant be­cause it shows there is a grow­ing con­sensus around the idea that net neut­ral­ity means com­pan­ies shouldn’t be al­lowed to pay for faster ser­vice.

“I think this is a le­gis­lat­ive state­ment,” Lewis said, ar­guing that Wheel­er will have to “take no­tice” of the out­pour­ing of op­pos­i­tion from law­makers, in­vestors, and In­ter­net com­pan­ies.

Wheel­er ex­pec­ted to take cri­ti­cism from Re­pub­lic­ans, who are skep­tic­al of the gov­ern­ment telling broad­band pro­viders how to man­age their net­works. But the grow­ing op­pos­i­tion to his pro­pos­al from Demo­crats could leave the FCC chief in a tenu­ous polit­ic­al po­s­i­tion. Even the White House has offered little sup­port, not­ing that the FCC is an “in­de­pend­ent agency.” 

Wheel­er needs the votes of both Demo­crats on the five-mem­ber com­mis­sion to en­act his pro­posed reg­u­la­tions. But those com­mis­sion­ers, Jes­sica Rosen­wor­cel and Mignon Cly­burn, might not be eager to help the chair­man if he’s all alone on the is­sue.

A spokes­man for the FCC chair­man de­clined to com­ment on the bill. 

The On­line Com­pet­i­tion and Con­sumer Choice Act, which also has the sup­port of Sen. Al Franken and Reps. Henry Wax­man and Anna Eshoo, would in­struct the FCC to en­act rules ban­ning paid pri­or­it­iz­a­tion with­in 90 days of the bill be­com­ing law. The bill would also call for rules ban­ning In­ter­net pro­viders from fa­vor­ing con­tent they own or are af­fil­i­ated with.

The bill avoids the con­ten­tious de­bate over the FCC’s au­thor­ity. Many net-neut­ral­ity sup­port­ers ar­gue that the only way to en­act rules that can sur­vive in court is to re­clas­si­fy In­ter­net pro­viders as “com­mon car­ri­er” util­it­ies un­der Title II of the Com­mu­nic­a­tions Act. But Re­pub­lic­ans and In­ter­net pro­viders ar­gue that util­ity-style reg­u­la­tion of the In­ter­net would dis­cour­age in­vest­ment and stifle eco­nom­ic growth.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×