Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

What If Super Committee Fails? Members Suggest Congress Would Rethink Sequestration What If Super Committee Fails? Members Suggest Congress Would Rethink ...

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



What If Super Committee Fails? Members Suggest Congress Would Rethink Sequestration


The co-chairs of the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction, Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., center, and Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas, left, arrive on Capitol Hill on Wednesday, Oct. 26, for the start of a hearing with Congressional Budget Office Director Douglas Elmendorf. Sen. Patrick Toomey, R-Pa., walks at right.(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)

House and Senate lawmakers would likely rethink allowing some budget cuts to be triggered automatically if the so-called deficit “super committee” fails to come up with at least $1.2 trillion in savings, or if Congress fails approve such a plan by Dec. 23, a member of the panel predicted on Sunday.

Appearing on Fox News Sunday, Sen. Pat Toomey, R-Pa., insisted he is not giving up on the chances that the Joint Select Committee on Deficit Reduction can make its Nov. 23 deadline for agreement on a plan to give to the rest of Congress to consider. That hopeful sentiment was echoed by the committee’s co-chairman, Rep. Jeb Hensarling, R-Texas., speaking Sunday on CNN's State of the Union—although his panel’s deadline is just 10 days away.


From National Journal:

ANALYSIS GOPers Channel Dick Cheney in NJ/CBS Debate

PICTURESGingrich Says He Can Change Washington

Insiders Say Who Won, Lost Foreign Policy Debate

But Toomey said that if agreement is not reached on how to cut at least $1.2 trillion from the nation’s deficit over the next decade, “I think a lively debate will occur” over whether to allow the automatic cuts take place—so-called sequestration—despite President Obama’s insistence on Friday he would not go along with any attempt to turn them off.

Toomey said that “in the very very unfortunate event that we don’t, I think it’s very likely that Congress would reconsider the configuration of that sequestration, and consider is this really the best way to do it?” Toomey said.


He added that the debate likely would be about the “nature of those cuts—which I think the cuts have to occur, but they might occur in a different fashion.”

Toomey’s comments come amid growing speculation that Congress could change the breakdown of the $1.2 trillion in cuts that would automatically kick in if the panel and lawmakers fail to reach a deal—half of which would come from the Pentagon and the other half from domestic programs. Republicans, in particular, have complained that such automatic cuts would be particularly harmful to the military.

To counter such talk, the White House put out a statement Friday underscoring its position that sequestration was put in place to help force a deal to slash the debt, and should not be reconsidered.

Members of the committee acknowledge that as of this weekend, they were not close to bipartisan agreement—in disputes over levels of cuts to entitlements and defining and proposing new revenues, including tax increases. But they also insist that they are continuing to work to reach a deal.


Hensarling, during his appearance on State of the Union, reiterated that for the super committee to succeed, lawmakers will have to agree on structural reforms to entitlement programs and tax reform.

Hensarling zeroed in on entitlement spending arguing that Medicaid and Medicare are "disserving their beneficiaries with forms of rationing and driving the country bankrupt."

"Republicans put forth a plan in our House budget," he said, referring to the so-called Ryan Plan contained in House Budget Committee Chairman Rep. Paul Ryan's budget. Hensarling also said that Republicans would be "willing to negotiate around" the so-called Rivlin-Domenici budget plan put forth by former Democratic White House budget director Alice Rivlin and former Republican Senate Budget Committee chairman Pete Domenici.

"This is a plan, bi-partisan plan ... that would also include a provision for future seniors to stay in tradtiioanl fee-for-service Medicare but use the power of patient choice and competition to save and strenghthen the program," Hensarling said.

comments powered by Disqus