Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

INFRASTRUCTURE: It’s Time for Congress to Act INFRASTRUCTURE: It’s Time for Congress to Act

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



INFRASTRUCTURE: It’s Time for Congress to Act

It’s not high-speed rail. It’s not a stimulus program to fill potholes. It’s not an infrastructure bank. President Obama is shedding several of his failed White House efforts on infrastructure and instead daring Congress to pass a six-year surface transportation bill.

Make no mistake, it is a dare. Lawmakers have been stymied all year over one question on the law that would update the funding system for the nation’s roads, bridges, railways, and runways: How do we pay for it? Thus far, there have been no easy answers. The Senate transportation chiefs punted and offered up a two-year bill that costs $109 billion, and they are still at least $12 billion short. The House is expected to vote on as-yet-unveiled legislation that will extend for six years, cost about $260 billion, and be paid for with new domestic oil drilling.


The House measure will amount to nothing more than a political stunt, carefully timed to nick at Americans’ anger as gas prices take their annual climb into the spring and summer driving season. Most Democrats won’t accept domestic drilling as a matter of environmental principle. Transportation aficionados hate the idea. They say drilling won’t produce enough funds, and it moves away from the “user-fee” concept that has always driven transportation funding.

Obama is countering with his own political stunt, suggesting that $200 billion in war savings be used to help pay for a six-year highway bill, according to a senior administration official. The idea won’t pass muster on Capitol Hill, where people consider war savings reserved for long-term deficit reduction. But it will please the transportation industry and the gurus in Congress who have been asking for the president to put his muscle behind a highway bill.

Last year, Obama talked about crumbling bridges. He mentioned job creation from highway projects. He even suggested that 80 percent of Americans should have access to high-speed rail. But he didn’t ask Congress for a bill. This year, Obama is putting the ball squarely in their court.

comments powered by Disqus