Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Scalia: Guns May be Regulated Scalia: Guns May be Regulated

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
 
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation
 

 

Sunday Shows

Scalia: Guns May be Regulated

+

US Supreme Court justice Antonin Scalia addresses the Chicago-Kent College Law justice Tuesday, Oct. 18, 2011, in Chicago. Scalia's remarks focused on the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2010 decision in Stop the Beach Renourishment Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental Protection, that fostered debate within the legal community and the general public over judicial takings. (AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)(AP Photo/Charles Rex Arbogast)

Justice Antonin Scalia, one of the Supreme Court's most vocal and conservative justices, said on Sunday that the Second Amendment leaves room for U.S. legislatures to regulate guns, including menacing hand-held weapons.

"It will have to be decided in future cases," Scalia said on Fox News Sunday. But there were legal precedents from the days of the Founding Fathers that banned frightening weapons which a constitutional originalist like himself must recognize. There were also "locational limitations" on where weapons could be carried, the justice noted.

 

(RELATED: 3 Steps Obama Can Take on Gun Control)

When asked if that kind of precedent would apply to assault weapons, or 100-round ammunition magazines like those used in the recent Colorado movie theater massacre, Scalia declined to speculate. "We'll see," he said. '"It will have to be decided."

As an originalist scholar, Scalia looks to the text of the Constitution—which confirms the right to bear arms—but also the context of 18th-century history. “They had some limitations on the nature of arms that could be borne," he told host Chris Wallace.

In a wide-ranging interview, Scalia also stuck by his criticism of Chief Justice John Roberts and the majority opinion in the ruling that upheld the Affordable Care Act this summer. "You don't interpret a penalty to be a pig. It can't be a pig," said Scalia, of the court's decision to call the penalty for not obtaining health insurance a tax. "There is no way to regard this penalty as a tax."

 

Scalia, a septuagenarian, said he had given no thought to retiring. "My wife doesn't want me hanging around the house," he joked. But he did say he would try to time his retirement from the court so that a justice of similar conservative sentiments would take his place, presumably as the appointee of a Republican president. "Of course I would not like to be replaced by somebody who sets out immediately to undo" what he has spent decades trying to achieve, the justice said.

See all NJ’s Sunday show coverage | Get Sunday show coverage in your inbox

DON'T MISS TODAY'S TOP STORIES

Sign up form for the newsletter
 
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL