The Administration Is Shifting $405M to Deal With the Border Crisis. Is It Enough?

None

Jeh Johnson speaks after he was nominated by US President Barack Obama to be the next Homeland Security secretary during a press conference in the Rose Garden of the White House on October 18, 2013 in Washington, DC. AFP PHOTO/Mandel NGAN (Photo credit should read MANDEL NGAN/AFP/Getty Images)
National Journal
Rachel Roubein
Aug. 5, 2014, 1:46 p.m.

Law­makers came up empty-handed after weeks of du­el­ing over just how much money should be spent at the U.S.-Mex­ico bor­der. Now, the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion is cop­ing with the fal­lout.

The po­ten­tial short-term solu­tion comes in the form of a money trans­fer, as the De­part­ment of Home­land Se­cur­ity is look­ing to re­pro­gram $405 mil­lion to ad­dress the tens of thou­sands of un­ac­com­pan­ied minors cross­ing the bor­der — a sum even less than the bill House Re­pub­lic­ans passed Fri­day ap­prov­ing $694 mil­lion in emer­gency funds.

As the ad­min­is­tra­tion called on Con­gress to pass a $3.7 bil­lion clean emer­gency sup­ple­ment­al bill last month, Home­land Se­cur­ity Sec­ret­ary Jeh John­son warned law­makers of the rami­fic­a­tions of a fu­ture with no ad­di­tion­al money to ad­dress what has been dubbed a hu­man­it­ari­an crisis at the bor­der. U.S. Im­mig­ra­tion and Cus­toms En­force­ment and U.S. Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion would run out of money in mid-Au­gust and mid-Septem­ber, re­spect­ively, John­son re­peatedly said.

With the House and the Sen­ate in re­cess and far from an agree­ment, DHS plans to trans­fer funds from sev­er­al pro­grams, which Re­u­ters ini­tially re­por­ted and de­part­ment spokes­wo­man Mar­sha Ca­t­ron con­firmed:

  • $267.6 mil­lion from the Fed­er­al Emer­gency Man­age­ment Agency’s dis­aster re­lief fund of roughly $11.3 bil­lion;
  • $31.5 mil­lion from the Coast Guard, which could post­pone main­ten­ance pro­jects for ves­sels;
  • $34.7 mil­lion from the Trans­port­a­tion Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion, which could delay the up­keep of its avi­ation se­cur­ity screen­ing equip­ment; and
  • $70.5 mil­lion in in­tern­al re­align­ment of Cus­toms and Bor­der Pro­tec­tion’s pri­or­it­ies, shift­ing money to the bor­der.

Without more money, the ad­min­is­tra­tion be­lieves ICE would have been un­able to trans­fer chil­dren to the Health and Hu­man Ser­vices De­part­ment’s care, cre­ate new places for mi­grants to stay and be pro­cessed, and con­tin­ue to fly adults with chil­dren back home.

The ad­min­is­tra­tion has made pro­gress, Ca­t­ron wrote in an email, and the num­ber of un­ac­com­pan­ied chil­dren cross­ing the bor­der did de­crease last month.

“But without help from Con­gress,” she wrote, “DHS simply does not have the re­sources we need and have had to make tough choices.”

The re­pro­gram­ming is much-needed, said Wendy Young, pres­id­ent of Kids in Need of De­fense. Yet it serves as a short-term fix and ex­poses how un­der­fund­ing agen­cies leaves them with little room to grapple with un­ex­pec­ted chal­lenges.

“It’s def­in­itely an emer­gency act that’s ab­so­lutely es­sen­tial,” Young said. “It prob­ably won’t re­solve the over­all sys­tem­ic is­sues, so let’s hope Con­gress starts talk­ing to each oth­er.”¦

“Re­pro­gram­ming is al­ways rough. There’s al­ways an ele­ment of rob­bing Peter to pay Paul go­ing on.”

The rerouted money is a far cry from Pres­id­ent Obama’s re­quest of $3.7 bil­lion. It’s dra­mat­ic­ally less than the $2.7 bil­lion pro­pos­al that failed in the Sen­ate and even the $694 mil­lion bill the House passed.

“It begs a big ques­tion,” said An­gela Kel­ley of the Cen­ter for Amer­ic­an Pro­gress, “be­cause you’re see­ing a massive short­fall of what they were ask­ing and what they could pos­sibly get from re­pro­gram­ming.”

That ques­tion — How long will this Band-Aid last? — doesn’t have a defin­it­ive an­swer, said Kel­ley, the cen­ter’s vice pres­id­ent for im­mig­ra­tion policy.

“I think it’s all be­ing writ­ten as we speak,” she said.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×