Voters Are Less Sexist Than You Think

Did gender really play a role in Christine Quinn’s New York City mayoral primary loss?

Christine Quinn (C), New York City Council Speaker and former mayoral hopeful, smiles with Democratic Party nominee Bill de Blasio (L), at a news conference where Quinn endorsed de Blasio outside City Hall on September 17, 2013 in New York City. De Blasio will face Republican Joseph Lhota in the general mayoral election November 5, 2013, with the winner succeeding current Mayor Michael Bloomberg. 
Getty Images
Nora Caplan-Bricker
See more stories about...
Nora Caplan-Bricker
Aug. 1, 2014, 1 a.m.

Do voters hold wo­men can­did­ates to a dif­fer­ent stand­ard? Wheth­er it’s a heck­ler telling Hil­lary Clin­ton to “iron my shirt” dur­ing the 2008 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, or the fact that Con­gress re­mains just 18.5 per­cent fe­male, it’s not hard to find signs of bi­as in Amer­ic­an polit­ics. But in her new book, When Does Gender Mat­ter? Wo­men Can­did­ates & Gender Ste­reo­types in Amer­ic­an Elec­tions (Ox­ford Uni­versity Press, 2014), polit­ic­al sci­ent­ist Kath­leen Dolan chal­lenges the con­ven­tion­al wis­dom. Al­though wo­men run for of­fice in far lower num­bers than men, she points out, they win at the same rate. Armed with the res­ults of two sur­veys she con­duc­ted dur­ing the 2010 midterms, Dolan ar­gues that gender fig­ures far less in voters’ de­cision-mak­ing than her fel­low schol­ars, and the polit­ic­al me­dia, as­sume.

Christine Quinn and Bill de Bla­sio. (Mario Tama/Getty Im­ages)Dolan points out a hole in the re­search that pre­ceded hers. While a wealth of stud­ies have found that voters see wo­men ac­cord­ing to ste­reo­types, most re­lied on hy­po­thet­ic­al match­ups, thought ex­per­i­ments about can­did­ates who are identic­al in every way but gender. In real races, of course, gender is one of many factors. “We know that voters hold polit­ic­al gender ste­reo­types, and we know that wo­men win elec­tions,” Dolan writes. “What we know much less about is what hap­pens between these two real­it­ies.”

The first of Dolan’s sur­veys gauged voters’ level of ste­reo­typ­ic­al think­ing. Thirty-one per­cent of re­spond­ents agreed with the state­ment that men are emo­tion­ally bet­ter-suited to polit­ics than wo­men, cor­rob­or­at­ing earli­er stud­ies. Two months later, Dolan went a step fur­ther, ask­ing the same voters to eval­u­ate wo­men can­did­ates run­ning for the House, the Sen­ate, and the gov­ernor­ship in their states — al­low­ing her to track wheth­er the people who dis­played hide­bound think­ing about wo­men in the first round ac­tu­ally ap­plied it when cast­ing their votes.

Her an­swer: not of­ten, and not in ways that mattered much. Faced with flesh-and-blood can­did­ates, voters’ bi­ases largely faded in­to the back­ground. In­stead, voters were swayed by things like in­cum­bency, cam­paign spend­ing — and, above all, par­tis­an­ship. Dolan’s single clearest find­ing is that party af­fil­i­ation trumps all. Not only do voters give it the most weight, but their be­liefs about gender also di­vide cleanly along par­tis­an lines. Lib­er­als tend to see wo­men as su­per­i­or poli­cy­makers when it comes to edu­ca­tion and abor­tion, while con­ser­vat­ives rate men more highly in areas like na­tion­al se­cur­ity and the eco­nomy. The split is ex­em­pli­fied by Dolan’s find­ing that the de­sire to see more wo­men elec­ted to of­fice cor­rel­ates with vot­ing for a Demo­crat­ic wo­man, but neg­at­ively cor­rel­ates with sup­port­ing a Re­pub­lic­an wo­man. Mean­while, people who be­lieve there should be few­er wo­men in of­fice are more likely to choose a Re­pub­lic­an wo­man over a Demo­crat­ic man. In oth­er words, Demo­crats are more likely to sup­port wo­men can­did­ates in the ab­stract, and Re­pub­lic­ans less so, but neither group holds the con­vic­tion dearly enough to vote across party lines.

Dolan ar­gues con­vin­cingly that journ­al­ists and polit­ic­al sci­ent­ists need to be more care­ful about singling out gender in races where oth­er factors seem to have played a lar­ger role. She points to a piece in The New York Times that spec­u­lated about New York may­or­al can­did­ate Christine Quinn’s gender vis-à-vis her loss, in which the au­thors were ob­liged to ac­know­ledge Quinn’s un­pop­u­lar ties to the “plu­to­crat­ic in­cum­bent” — and the lack of a gender gap in the exit polls.

Still, Dolan’s work to dis­en­tangle ques­tions about gender from our un­der­stand­ing of why wo­men can­did­ates win or lose only goes so far. What would her sur­vey mod­el re­veal, for ex­ample, if ap­plied to primary races (such as Quinn’s), where the ques­tion of party af­fil­i­ation dis­ap­pears? And, as she notes, gender’s ef­fect on voters isn’t the only way it can be a bar­ri­er. Polit­ic­al elites are less likely to re­cruit wo­men to run, and wo­men tend to be harsh­er judges than men of their own read­i­ness to enter a race. Gender may not be everything, but, as the small num­ber of wo­men in Con­gress at­tests, it still mat­ters.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×