When Fundraisers Cater to Women

When fundraisers cater to women.

This illustration can only be used with the Andrea Drusch piece that ran in the 7/26/2014 issue of National Journal magazine. 
National Journal
Andrea Drusch
July 25, 2014, 1 a.m.

On a Tues­day even­ing sev­er­al months ago, in the lobby of a swanky down­town law of­fice, young wo­men in sun­dresses sipped Ken­tucky Derby”“in­spired drinks, snapped pic­tures with one an­oth­er, and mingled cas­u­ally. Peer­ing out from un­der wide-brimmed hats, they poin­ted out law­makers and can­did­ates passing through the room. Even­tu­ally, the at­ri­um filled with about 150 people. The event could have passed for a sor­or­ity mix­er, but the wo­men in hats were on a polit­ic­al mis­sion. Their aim was to raise money for the Right­NOW Wo­men PAC, a group that — among its oth­er goals — hopes to cre­ate an army of bund­lers and fun­draisers to sup­port right-of-cen­ter fe­male con­gres­sion­al can­did­ates.

(Il­lus­tra­tion by Neil Webb)The Right­NOW Wo­men event was hardly unique. Fun­drais­ing events that cater to wo­men are now part of the fab­ric of Wash­ing­ton — on both the left and the right. In the past few months, Rep. Di­ana De­Gette (Demo­crat of Col­or­ado) hos­ted a spa day at the Four Sea­sons Hotel, Rep. Terri Sewell (Demo­crat of Alabama) hos­ted a “Ladies Power Lunch,” and Rep. Lor­etta Sanc­hez (Demo­crat of Cali­for­nia) hos­ted a mani-pedi day at Tammy’s Nails on the Hill. All of these fun­draisers were at­ten­ded primar­ily by wo­men.

These events may sound cliched or even pat­ron­iz­ing, but it’s also true that they provide an al­tern­at­ive to a dom­in­ant fun­drais­ing cul­ture that has his­tor­ic­ally catered to male ste­reo­types. “The land­scape of polit­ic­al fun­drais­ing is chan­ging,” says Katie Vli­et­stra Wonnen­berg, pres­id­ent of Wo­men in Gov­ern­ment Re­la­tions, a trade as­so­ci­ation aimed at unit­ing wo­men in the lob­by­ing in­dustry. “It’s not the same old ‘go play 18 holes of golf’ or ‘ci­gars and bour­bon.’ “

The Podesta Group’s Cristina Ante­lo sighed at the pro­spect of at­tend­ing some of the re­cent fun­draisers she’d been in­vited to. “I got an in­vit­a­tion for skeet shoot­ing,” Ante­lo says. “I thought, ‘No, I’m not go­ing to go em­bar­rass my­self in front of a whole group of people.’ ” One fe­male lob­by­ist who asked not to be named cringed at in­vit­a­tions she’d re­ceived for ci­gar-smoking fun­draisers. “You just come away smelling so bad,” she says. “If I can avoid it, I try.” Even wo­men who aren’t sure about get­ting their toes done in front of a con­gress­wo­man say they find all-fe­male fun­draisers more col­lab­or­at­ive, and gen­er­ally more re­lax­ing, than typ­ic­al Hill events.

Vli­et­stra Wonnen­berg praised a move­ment to­ward more lunch and break­fast events, which she says moth­ers can at­tend without hav­ing to forgo pick­ing up their kids from school. “I think there’s a dif­fer­ent ca­marader­ie at an event or­gan­ized by wo­men for a fe­male can­did­ate,” Vli­et­stra Wonnen­berg says. “There’s much more of that kit­chen-table as­pect of talk­ing about is­sues and throw­ing around ideas.”

Ming­ling at a Right­NOW Wo­men fun­draiser in April.  (Richard A. Bloom)Re­pub­lic­an fun­draiser Lisa Spies also be­lieves in em­power­ing wo­men by ask­ing them for money. Dur­ing the 2012 pres­id­en­tial cam­paign, she was the brains be­hind a phe­nom­en­ally suc­cess­ful fun­drais­ing ef­fort for Mitt Rom­ney: Tasked with the lofty goal of rais­ing $10 mil­lion from fe­male donors, she brought in $23 mil­lion.

Spies says the ef­fort was bolstered by more wo­men mak­ing the fin­an­cial de­cisions in their house­holds, but she also cred­its her suc­cess to mak­ing wo­men feel that their voices were be­ing heard. “The reas­on we did so well was be­cause we had a seat at the table,” Spies ex­plains. “When you take people ser­i­ously, they take you ser­i­ously.” Spies isn’t of the school of thought that fund-rais­ing events for wo­men need to be turned pink. In her ex­per­i­ence, she says, wo­men are most in­ves­ted when they feel they’re be­ing treated as equals.

For its part, Right­NOW Wo­men hopes it can in­terest more young Re­pub­lic­an wo­men in rais­ing money. The PAC is get­ting on so­cial me­dia to spread the word about its fun­draisers, and it’s set­ting a low price point to be in­clus­ive. “We try to keep these events at $20 to $30 — that’s brunch in D.C.,” PAC founder Alyson Hig­gins says. She points to her own re­cent-gradu­ate salary as a bar­ri­er to polit­ic­al giv­ing. “You’re not go­ing to spend your rent money to sup­port a can­did­ate,” she ex­plains.

Dona­tions of that size may take longer to add up, but the PAC has already sup­por­ted five fe­male can­did­ates in the 2014 cycle. “We got a lot of great feed­back, per­son­al thank-yous,” PAC ad­viser Mar­lene Colucci says. “I think [the can­did­ates] real­ize this group is dif­fer­ent. It’s not com­ing from a large cor­por­a­tion or an as­so­ci­ation that has PAC money to spend.”

As Spies points out, en­cour­aging wo­men to get in­volved young builds ties to the can­did­ates and the party — which will someday pay off as these wo­men move for­ward in their ca­reers and have more to give. “I think with wo­men, when you en­gage them early, es­pe­cially in a sub­stant­ive way, they feel a part of the cam­paign, and they feel a part of the strategy, and they give more,” Spies says. “They will in­vest their time, and then they’ll in­vest their money.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×