A One-Step Guide to Infuriating an EPA Official

The agency chief touts her staff’s work after a Republican accused her committee of kowtowing to a green group.

Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Gina McCarthy.
National Journal
Jason Plautz
July 23, 2014, 10:09 a.m.

Re­pub­lic­ans are ac­cus­ing the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency of let­ting a green group write its land­mark cli­mate rules, and EPA isn’t happy about it.

Re­pub­lic­an Sen. John Bar­rasso of Wyom­ing ac­cused EPA Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy Wed­nes­day of let­ting the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil dic­tate its rules, say­ing the agency had de­ferred to the group’s “power­ful, wealthy, Wash­ing­ton law­yers and lob­by­ists” while writ­ing the agency’s car­bon-pol­lu­tion rules for ex­ist­ing power plants.

“They [the NRDC] have mil­lions, which gives them ac­cess. The EPA has turned a deaf ear on those who don’t,” Bar­rasso said at an En­vir­on­ment and Pub­lic Works Com­mit­tee hear­ing.

Mc­Carthy wasn’t hav­ing it, and when it came time for ques­tions and an­swers, when Bar­rasso asked why EPA had let NRDC write the rule, Mc­Carthy curtly replied, “We did not.”

Later in the hear­ing, Mc­Carthy said the al­leg­a­tions were a “dis­cred­it” to EPA staff who had worked around the clock to meet with stake­hold­ers from all sides to design the cli­mate rule.

And Mc­Carthy’s Sen­ate al­lies were swift to fire back, with in­de­pend­ent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Ver­mont say­ing it was “re­mark­able that my Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues would dare to raise the is­sue of cam­paign fin­ance” be­fore tick­ing down a list of fig­ures on the spend­ing done by the oil and gas in­dustry.

“Is there money com­ing in­to the polit­ic­al pro­cess from wealthy lib­er­als? The an­swer is yes,” Sanders said. “But that money is clearly dwarfed by the amount of money com­ing in from the fossil-fuel in­dustry.”

The GOP charges come in re­sponse to a New York Times story this month that said a policy out­line draf­ted by the NRDC had served as the “blue­print” for EPA’s Clean Power Plan, which would re­quire emis­sion cuts of 30 per­cent from power plants by 2030. NRDC in 2012 re­leased a pro­pos­al on how to reg­u­late emis­sions from power plants that would have set dif­fer­ent lim­its for states and al­lowed re­gion­al flex­ib­il­ity, a strategy EPA em­braced in its own rule.

EPA has denied that NRDC ex­er­cised clout in writ­ing the rule — a blog post days after the story by Janet Mc­Cabe, act­ing chief of the agency’s air of­fice, de­scribed meet­ing with “lit­er­ally thou­sands” of stake­hold­ers dur­ing the draft­ing pro­cess.

But that hasn’t stopped crit­ics from seiz­ing on the sup­posed in­flu­ence as a sign of what they say is a crooked draft­ing pro­cess. Bar­rasso on Wed­nes­day prom­ised to fol­low up with a doc­u­ment re­quest on NRDC’s role, with a jab at the re­cent dis­clos­ure that EPA had lost some emails due to a hard-drive crash.

“If the an­swer is no, that you will not com­ply, or that there are more re­cord-keep­ing mis­haps, broken hard drives, lost files, then we’ll know the truth about this agency as well,” Bar­rasso said.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×