U.S. Downplays Extremist Seizure of Low-Grade Uranium in Iraq

None

U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki speaks to the press in Washington in February. On Thursday, the spokeswoman downplayed risks associated with the seizure of a quantity of low-grade uranium in Iraq by extremist insurgents.
National Journal
Rachel Oswald
July 11, 2014, 10:33 a.m.

The U.S. State De­part­ment on Thursday moved to re­duce con­cern about the re­cent seizure of low-grade nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al in Ir­aq by Is­lam­ic ex­trem­ists.

Bagh­dad in a Ju­ly 8 let­ter no­ti­fied the United Na­tions that roughly 88 pounds of urani­um com­pounds were now un­der the con­trol of the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia after the group took con­trol of a uni­versity in Mo­sul, where the nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al was used for sci­entif­ic re­search. Though the Ir­aqi gov­ern­ment has warned that IS­IS mil­it­ants could try to use the sub­stance in a ter­ror­ist act, in­de­pend­ent is­sue spe­cial­ists have said the urani­um is not suit­able for use in a nuc­le­ar device or even a ra­di­olo­gic­al “dirty bomb.”

State De­part­ment spokes­wo­man Jen Psaki dir­ec­ted re­port­ers to a state­ment put out by the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency, which said it un­der­stood the urani­um to be of low grade and to pose no sig­ni­fic­ant pro­lif­er­a­tion risk.

The Vi­enna-based nuc­le­ar watch­dog agency is “the ap­pro­pri­ate en­tity to make any de­cision about wheth­er there is a risk or con­cern, but it doesn’t seem that is the case at this point in time,” Psaki said in a Thursday brief­ing.

Psaki noted that Bagh­dad had said the urani­um was “used for sci­entif­ic and med­ic­al pur­poses.” That fact, she ad­ded, was “an im­port­ant con­tex­tu­al point on our level of con­cern.”

Mat­thew Bunn, a nuc­le­ar weapons spe­cial­ist at Har­vard Uni­versity, in a Fri­day web post for Na­tion­al In­terest said it was likely that the urani­um in ques­tion was “nat­ur­al or de­pleted urani­um — use­less for a ter­ror­ist group try­ing to make a nuc­le­ar bomb. It’s of no sig­ni­fic­ant use for a ‘dirty bomb’ either, as urani­um is only very weakly ra­dio­act­ive.”

The Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia at one point was a re­cog­nized al-Qaida fran­chise. However, ties between the two ex­trem­ist groups were said to be form­ally severed earli­er this year after al-Qaida lead­er Ay­man al-Za­wahiri grew angry that IS­IS mil­it­ants were fight­ing with an­oth­er al-Qaida-af­fil­i­ated group and in­dis­crim­in­ately killing ci­vil­ians. Al-Qaida’s in­terest in car­ry­ing out a nuc­le­ar or ra­di­olo­gic­al at­tack on a West­ern tar­get has been well doc­u­mented.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×