Iraq’s Probably Going to Need Help Taking Back Its Country

But Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel said no U.S. troops will perform combat missions.

Members of the Al-Abbas brigades, who volunteered to protect the Shiite Muslim holy sites in Karbala against Sunni militants fighting the Baghdad government, parade in the streets of the Shrine city on June 26, 2014. Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki conceded that political measures are needed alongside military action to repel a Sunni insurgent offensive that is threatening to tear Iraq apart.
National Journal
Jordain Carney
July 3, 2014, 9:55 a.m.

While ini­tial U.S. as­sess­ments sug­gest that Ir­aq’s se­cur­ity forces are able to de­fend Bagh­dad, what about tak­ing back parts of the coun­try that have been lost to in­sur­gents?

Well, the Pentagon be­lieves Ir­aq will likely need some help with that.

“I think that’s a really broad, cam­paign-qual­ity ques­tion. Prob­ably not by them­selves,” said Gen. Mar­tin De­mp­sey, chair­man of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, when asked about the abil­ity of Ir­aqi se­cur­ity forces to re­take ter­rit­ory cap­tured by the Is­lam­ic State of Ir­aq and Syr­ia.

The United States has roughly 650 troops in Ir­aq. It has also sent planes and ships in­to the re­gion since the crisis began. IS­IS, for its part, de­clared its ter­rit­ory in Ir­aq and Syr­ia to be an Is­lam­ic state, but De­mp­sey said he be­lieves their forces are cur­rently stretched thin as they try to main­tain their gains. 

De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel said Thursday dur­ing the joint brief­ing that U.S. troops cur­rently in Ir­aqar­en’t in­volved in com­bat mis­sions — and won’t be in­volved in com­bat mis­sions. But De­mp­sey seemed to leave the door open, say­ing that “we may get to that point” when U.S. troops have dir­ect mil­it­ary in­volve­ment in Ir­aq.

“That is one op­tion, but one I per­son­ally don’t think [is what] the situ­ation de­mands,” he ad­ded, stress­ing that the cur­rent U.S. strategy isn’t the same as in 2003 and 2006 — when the U.S. in­vaded Ir­aq and in the lead-up to the surge of U.S. troops, re­spect­ively.

In the mean­time, the United States is still try­ing to get a full pic­ture of what is go­ing on in Ir­aq. Ima­gine try­ing to solve a Ru­bik’s Cube without be­ing able to see all of the sides.

Lead­ing that ef­fort is the Pentagon, which has six as­sess­ment teams in Ir­aq. It also has two joint op­er­a­tions cen­ters there — one in Bagh­dad and a second in Er­bil, a large city in north­ern Ir­aq.

And al­though the Pentagon’s top duo are get­ting early as­sess­ments, Hagel said, we “won’t have the full com­ple­ment of all those as­sess­ments for a while.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×