As Infamous Germ-Research Lab Moves West, What Happens to Plum Island?

Homeland Security wants to sell the mysterious island to developers, but some lawmakers fear damage to the Long Island Sound’s ecology.

National Journal
Billy House
July 2, 2014, 9:46 a.m.

Plum Is­land has fas­cin­ated con­spir­acy the­or­ists for dec­ades. Weird and sin­is­ter spec­u­la­tion about the gov­ern­ment’s germ re­search on the 3-mile strip has spawned le­gends that only get bet­ter with age, like the al­leged post-World War II re­cruit­ment of Nazi sci­ent­ists to work there on a bio­lo­gic­al-weapons pro­gram, or the re­search con­duc­ted there that sup­posedly led to the spread of Lyme dis­ease.

But now, there’s a far dif­fer­ent type of con­tro­versy spread­ing over Plum Is­land: how to use it after the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment packs up the Na­tion­al Bio and Agro-De­fense Fa­cil­ity and moves west, to a new $1 bil­lion lab in Man­hat­tan, Kan.

Un­der a cur­rent budget-bal­an­cing plan, the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment in­tends to sell Plum Is­land to the highest bid­der, rais­ing an es­tim­ated $32.8 mil­lion to off­set a por­tion of the cost of the Kan­sas lab.

But on Wed­nes­day, a group of New York and Con­necti­c­ut mem­bers of Con­gress, joined by en­vir­on­ment­al­ists, launched an ef­fort to con­vince House and Sen­ate ap­pro­pri­at­ors to drop the sale.

These law­makers from the Long Is­land Sound re­gion — in­clud­ing Chuck Schu­mer and Kirsten Gil­librand of New York and Richard Blu­menth­al and Chris Murphy of Con­necti­c­ut, among oth­ers — ar­gue in a let­ter to their col­leagues that the en­vir­on­ment­al and eco­lo­gic­al value of the is­land ex­ceeds the es­tim­ated pro­ceeds that could be raised by selling it. In­stead, they want it turned over to the Na­tion­al Park Ser­vice or the Fish and Wild­life Ser­vice.

“We need to pro­ceed very care­fully when con­sid­er­ing the fu­ture of this en­vir­on­ment­al and eco­lo­gic­al treas­ure,” said Rep. Rosa De­Lauro of Con­necti­c­ut. “We have a re­spons­ib­il­ity to en­sure the pro­tec­tion and pre­ser­va­tion of this na­tion­al treas­ure, not only for those liv­ing near their shores, but for their chil­dren and chil­dren’s chil­dren.”

Of course, there’s no dis­put­ing that Plum Is­land for years housed some of the most leth­al bac­teria known to hu­man­kind — or­gan­isms re­spons­ible for swine flu, foot-and-mouth dis­ease, and oth­er live­stock ail­ments. The George W. Bush ad­min­is­tra­tion even ac­know­ledged in 2008 that — 20 years earli­er — there had been ac­ci­dents at the fa­cil­ity, in­clud­ing one in 1978 in­volving the re­lease of highly con­ta­gious foot-and-mouth dis­ease in­to the cattle-hold­ing pens on the is­land.

And the House and Sen­ate mem­bers ar­guing to keep Plum Is­land in fed­er­al gov­ern­ment hands ad­mit it might take mil­lions of dol­lars to re­medi­ate after dec­ades of germ-re­search use. But they ar­gue that “the en­vir­on­ment­al sig­ni­fic­ance of the Plum Is­land area can­not be over­stated.”

The gov­ern­ment’s own en­vir­on­ment­al im­pact state­ments say that a vast num­ber of spe­cies could be im­pacted by de­vel­op­ment on Plum Is­land, in­clud­ing at least two en­dangered spe­cies, the pip­ing plover and the roseate tern. In ad­di­tion, the law­makers ar­gued that de­vel­op­ment of the is­land may af­fect the already en­dangered At­lantic rid­ley sea turtle and three oth­er spe­cies.

“From per­son­al vis­its, pho­tos, and con­ver­sa­tions with ex­perts, we know that the is­land is a crit­ic­al hab­it­at and a pristine land­scape that must be pro­tec­ted in per­petu­ity,” the law­makers wrote to their con­gres­sion­al col­leagues.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×