Wall Street’s Climate War Intensifies With New Weapons

Global-warming activists are giving investors new tools to pressure companies or even divest outright.

A man stands next to the bronze bull symbolizing financial markets near Wall Street in lower Manhattan November 2, 2010 in New York City. The Dow Jones industrial average rose as investors awaited the results nationwide elections, putting the average near its highest point this year. (Photo by Chris Hondros/Getty Images)
National Journal
Ben Geman
June 30, 2014, 5 a.m.

An act­iv­ist group on Monday un­veiled a new tool for keep­ing tabs on what com­pan­ies are — and aren’t — dis­clos­ing about risks they face from glob­al warm­ing.

The in­vestor ad­vocacy group Ceres has launched a search­able data­base of what 3,000 large cor­por­a­tions say about cli­mate change in an­nu­al re­ports to the Se­cur­it­ies and Ex­change Com­mis­sion.

The Ceres tool is fresh evid­ence that share­hold­er act­iv­ism is play­ing a grow­ing role in battles over cli­mate change. The new data­base looks at fil­ings from com­pan­ies in the Rus­sell 3,000 in­dex of the largest U.S. cor­por­a­tions, but users can also look more nar­rowly at the S&P 500.

Act­iv­ists say that in­vestors should have more in­form­a­tion about how pub­licly held com­pan­ies may be af­fected by fed­er­al and state cli­mate and en­ergy policies, as well as the phys­ic­al risks that cli­mate change cre­ates for busi­nesses from threats such as rising sea levels and severe weath­er.

“For mar­kets to prop­erly ac­count for rising cli­mate-re­lated risks, in­vestors need in­form­a­tion on how com­pan­ies re­cog­nize and man­age those risks. This tool helps to make that en­ter­prise far easi­er for in­vestors in­ter­ested in un­der­stand­ing and man­aging cli­mate risk,” said Ju­lie Gorte, seni­or vice pres­id­ent for sus­tain­able in­vest­ing at Pax World, a com­pany that spe­cial­izes in green in­vest­ing.

In 2010, the SEC re­leased guidelines for how com­pan­ies should be ac­count­ing for cli­mate-re­lated risks in their fil­ings with the reg­u­lat­ors. But ac­cord­ing to Ceres, the re­port­ing has been spotty and of­ten curs­ory, and the group says the SEC hasn’t done enough to put teeth in­to the dis­clos­ure re­quire­ment.

Ac­cord­ing to Ceres, only half of the Rus­sell 3,000 filers ad­dressed cli­mate change in their an­nu­al re­ports.

“Ro­bust cli­mate-re­lated data from com­pan­ies is a crit­ic­al need, but it’s still lack­ing,” Ceres Pres­id­ent Mindy Lub­ber said in a state­ment. “This tool is an im­port­ant step in mak­ing it easi­er for in­vestors to ana­lyze cor­por­ate data that’s avail­able and what’s still miss­ing.”

While Ceres or­gan­izes in­vestors to push com­pan­ies on cli­mate and sus­tain­ab­il­ity, a sep­ar­ate group of act­iv­ists is wa­ging a cam­paign that presses uni­versit­ies, cit­ies, and oth­ers to di­vest their hold­ings from fossil-fuel cor­por­a­tions.

And that brings up an­oth­er new de­vel­op­ment: Thursday af­ter­noon brought the launch of the Fossil Free In­dexes US, which meas­ures the per­form­ance of a ver­sion of the S&P 500 that ex­cludes large oil, gas, and coal com­pan­ies.

“We’re primed to give in­vestors a unique op­por­tun­ity to in­vest in the broad mar­ket while avoid­ing the in­creas­ing risk of long-term in­vest­ment in fossil fuels,” said Stu­art Bra­man, CEO of Fossil Free In­dexes, which has worked with 350.org, one of the act­iv­ist groups be­hind the di­vest­ment move­ment.

Fossil Free In­dexes has tracked the per­form­ance of its in­dex against the S&P 500 — which is made up largely of U.S. com­pan­ies — go­ing back a dec­ade.

“Over the 10 years end­ing 5/30/14, the cor­rel­a­tion between re­turns on FFI­US and the S&P 500 has been very high, sug­gest­ing that in­dex in­vestors need not sac­ri­fice re­turns when choos­ing not to in­vest in the biggest car­bon re­source com­pan­ies,” the com­pany said in an­noun­cing the new in­dex.

It’s the second such in­dex to launch in re­cent months.

In late April the U.K.-based in­dex pro­vider FTSE Group, the wealth-man­age­ment com­pany Black­Rock, and the Nat­ur­al Re­sources De­fense Coun­cil un­veiled the ex-Fossil Fuels In­dex Series, which is a glob­al set of in­dexes.

Bra­man, the founder of the new­er in­dex launched last week, said it’s a way to provide to provide op­tions for “in­sti­tu­tions and in­di­vidu­als to help pro­tect the plan­et along with their in­vest­ments.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×