Former Soviet Nuclear Test Site Still Holds Mysteries

None

Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
Aug. 15, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

SE­MEY, Kaza­kh­stan — The nuc­le­ar test­ing ground of the former So­viet Uni­on is a vast, bar­ren area close to the size of Lake Ontario that con­tin­ues to hold some amount of se­cur­ity risk.

Dur­ing the Cold War, hun­dreds of at­mo­spher­ic and un­der­ground atom­ic weapons tests were con­duc­ted here at the Semi­p­al­at­insk Test Site in north­east­ern Kaza­kh­stan, near the Rus­si­an bor­der.

Nuc­le­ar ex­plo­sions dec­ades ago at the test site left be­hind con­sid­er­able sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­al that Kaza­kh­stan, Rus­sia and the United States have worked to­geth­er for years to se­cure.

Last fall, the three na­tions com­pleted activ­ity on a joint pro­ject that sealed a num­ber of tun­nels in Degel­en Moun­tain at the south­ern end of the ex­per­i­ment­al range, where So­viet un­der­ground nuc­le­ar weapons tests were con­duc­ted dur­ing the Cold War.

Des­pite the suc­cess of that pro­ject, a real like­li­hood ex­ists that more nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al re­mains out there, bur­ied be­neath the soil of the Semi­p­al­at­insk steppe, un­se­cured and po­ten­tially vul­ner­able to theft, ac­cord­ing to Sergey Lukashen­ko, dir­ect­or of the In­sti­tute of Ra­di­ation Safety and Eco­logy at Kaza­kh­stan’s Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Cen­ter.

It is not clear wheth­er au­thor­it­ies know ex­actly where the sub­stances are loc­ated and in what amounts and con­di­tions.

Kaza­kh­stani gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials and is­sue ex­perts say that any ma­ter­i­al still left un­ac­coun­ted likely stops far short of pos­ing the kind of nuc­le­ar ter­ror­ism risk that the plutoni­um, left be­hind in the tun­nels of Degel­en Moun­tain, did.

Still, Sergei Berez­in, the deputy dir­ect­or gen­er­al of the Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Cen­ter, which man­ages Semi­p­al­at­insk, last week told a group of vis­it­ing U.S. journ­al­ists “it is pos­sible” that there might still be sens­it­ive nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al at the former test site.

The Kaza­kh­stani gov­ern­ment in As­tana is dis­cuss­ing with Mo­scow what it knows about any nuc­le­ar ex­per­i­ments that might have been con­duc­ted by the So­viet Uni­on at vari­ous points around Semi­p­al­at­insk, an area of roughly 7,000 square miles.

“We’ve been hold­ing con­sulta­tions with the Rus­si­an gov­ern­ment. It’s an on­go­ing ne­go­ti­ation,” Berez­in said through a trans­lat­or.

“The prob­lem is even Rus­si­ans, they don’t have very ex­act in­form­a­tion about events that happened in the 1950s,” Lukashen­ko said.

Lukashen­ko is lead­ing a team of sci­ent­ists that spends stretches of time liv­ing in camps at Semi­p­al­at­insk — also known as “the Poly­gon,” due to its shape — while they con­duct re­search in­to the linger­ing en­vir­on­ment­al im­pacts of ra­di­ation pro­duced by the nuc­le­ar tests and search for areas of un­usu­ally high ra­dio­activ­ity that can sig­nal the pres­ence of un­ac­coun­ted nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al.

Un­der the So­viet Uni­on, de­tails about in­di­vidu­al weapons tests — as well as atom­ic en­ergy safety ex­per­i­ments that em­ployed nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­als — were kept secret by dif­fer­ent min­is­tries, ac­cord­ing to Lukashen­ko.

“One de­part­ment didn’t know what the oth­er de­part­ment [was] do­ing and only a few people who planned [the] ex­per­i­ment, who in­ven­ted [the] ex­per­i­ment, knew everything,” he told U.S. re­port­ers, whose travel to Kaza­kh­stan was or­gan­ized by the In­ter­na­tion­al Re­port­ing Pro­ject.

The So­vi­ets were un­der­stood to have spotty re­cord-keep­ing, mak­ing it pos­sible that there is yet more sens­it­ive ma­ter­i­al to be found at the test site. There is little in­dic­a­tion that Rus­sia has with­held rel­ev­ant in­form­a­tion, but rather Mo­scow could simply lack re­li­able data that might be passed along to Wash­ing­ton or As­tana.

The Na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Cen­ter has be­gun a com­pre­hens­ive sur­vey of the Semi­p­al­at­insk Ex­per­i­ment­al Field, the area where most of the at­mo­spher­ic tests took place.

Based on con­cerns that bad act­ors might seek to gath­er up large amounts of con­tam­in­ated dirt in or­der to ex­tract the plutoni­um con­tained with­in it and use it to build a weapon, the cen­ter is doc­u­ment­ing levels of the chem­ic­al ele­ment in the soil over an area about 125 square miles.

“There are some places with high con­cen­tra­tions of plutoni­um,” Lukashen­ko said.

Still, he thinks it would be very dif­fi­cult for the plutoni­um to be fash­ioned in­to a nuc­le­ar bomb.

“To ex­tract a sig­ni­fic­ant amount of plutoni­um, you have to treat tons of soil, hun­dreds of tons,” Lukashen­ko said.

One would also need ac­cess to spe­cial­ized equip­ment and know­ledge of spe­cif­ic chem­ic­al pro­cesses for re­mov­ing the plutoni­um from the soil, “but it’s pos­sible in prin­ciple” to ex­tract the fis­sile ma­ter­i­al, he said.

Less tech­nic­ally ar­du­ous would be us­ing the soil to con­struct a ra­di­olo­gic­al “dirty bomb.” Kaza­kh­stan and the United States pre­vi­ously worked to­geth­er to pave over a dif­fer­ent sec­tion of Semi­p­al­at­insk con­tain­ing a large amount of plutoni­um-filled soil that was judged to pose a dirty-bomb threat.

Lukashen­ko said he sup­ports cart­ing away all of the heav­ily con­tam­in­ated soil at the Ex­per­i­ment­al Field, which he es­tim­ated might con­tain enough plutoni­um to pro­duce one or per­haps even two bombs.

Presently, the U.S. and Kaza­kh­stani gov­ern­ments are dis­cuss­ing the para­met­ers of a pro­ject that would gath­er up all of the highly con­tam­in­ated soil and trans­fer it to a tun­nel in Degel­en Moun­tain that would then be sealed. Wash­ing­ton is un­der­stood to be will­ing to fund the work.

Both gov­ern­ments de­clined to dis­cuss spe­cif­ics about the con­sulta­tions, in­clud­ing when the pro­ject might get un­der way, due to the sens­it­ive nature of the work.

While Degel­en Moun­tain is kept un­der sur­veil­lance by Kaza­kh­stani troops — as well as by sensors and drones provided by the United States — the rest of Semi­p­al­at­insk is left fairly un­pro­tec­ted, ac­cord­ing to Dmitriy Kalmykov, dir­ect­or of the Eco-Mu­seum in the city of Karaganda, south of As­tana.

Kalmykov’s or­gan­iz­a­tion es­tim­ates that a few thou­sand people ac­tu­ally live on the Poly­gon. Cattle are free to graze on the land and cars come and go.

Pri­or to the start of the Ex­per­i­ment­al Field sur­vey, Rus­sia in­dic­ated it did not ex­pect the study would turn up any­thing un­usu­al, Lukashen­ko said.

“When we start this very de­tailed sur­vey of [the] Ex­per­i­ment­al Field, Rus­sia changes their opin­ion. Be­fore they said ‘No, it’s noth­ing in­ter­est­ing for us.’ Now, they change a little bit,” the ra­di­ation in­sti­tute dir­ect­or said with a chuckle. “They said, ‘We are afraid you will find something.’”

He ad­ded: “They are just afraid that maybe some­body from their or­gan­iz­a­tion made something” in the early 1950s that “nobody knows [about] and if we try to dig up something, we will find [it].”

Just with­in the past year, Lukashen­ko’s team found a frag­ment of a spe­cial al­loy that con­tains a very unique com­pos­i­tion of en­riched urani­um, nick­el and iron. The al­loy was found bur­ied about three feet deep in the Ex­per­i­ment­al Field.

“I don’t un­der­stand for what they pro­duced this ma­ter­i­al,” Lukashen­ko said, adding that much nuc­le­ar re­search per­formed at Semi­p­al­at­insk six dec­ades ago went bey­ond just weapons test­ing. “Nobody knows for what they pro­duced this al­loy.”

It’s dis­cov­er­ies like these that Lukashen­ko said led former Los Alam­os Na­tion­al Labor­at­ory Dir­ect­or Siegfried Heck­er to dub him and his team “nuc­le­ar ar­che­olo­gists.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×