Pentagon-Sponsored Report: Civilian Nuclear Reactors at Risk of Attack

None

Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Douglas P. Guarino, Global Security Newswire
Aug. 16, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — A new re­port com­mis­sioned by the Pentagon main­tains that nuc­le­ar fa­cil­it­ies run by private com­pan­ies and uni­versit­ies re­main vul­ner­able to a 9/11-style ter­ror­ist at­tack.

By con­trast, atom­ic sites op­er­ated by the De­fense and En­ergy De­part­ments are largely pro­tec­ted from the pos­sib­il­ity of such as­saults.

The re­port, is­sued by the Nuc­le­ar Pro­lif­er­a­tion Pre­ven­tion Pro­ject at the Uni­versity of Texas-Aus­tin, calls at­ten­tion to the reg­u­la­tions of the U.S. Nuc­le­ar Reg­u­lat­ory Com­mis­sion, which li­censes ci­vil­ian nuc­le­ar re­act­ors. Alan Ku­per­man — one of two of au­thors of the doc­u­ment — said in a con­fer­ence call with re­port­ers on Thursday that the NRC rules cur­rently re­quire com­mer­cial re­act­ors to be able to de­fend them­selves against at­tack by a group of ap­prox­im­ately five or six ter­ror­ists.

This is nearly double the num­ber of hy­po­thet­ic­al at­tack­ers that com­mer­cial re­act­ors were re­quired to de­fend against pri­or to the Septem­ber 2001 at­tacks on New York and Wash­ing­ton, Ku­per­man noted. He ad­ded though, that it is still less than half of the 19 ter­ror­ists be­lieved to have dir­ectly car­ried out the World Trade Cen­ter and Pentagon at­tacks.

“We com­mend the up­grades, but our con­cern is they’re not enough,” said Ku­per­man, re­fer­ring to the abil­ity of the reg­u­la­tions to pro­tect against a worst case scen­ario.

Also of con­cern is that NRC rules do not re­quire man­agers of ex­ist­ing com­mer­cial re­act­ors to pro­tect the fa­cil­it­ies from at­tacks that might come from the air — as they did in 2001 — or by sea, Ku­per­man said.

Past at­tempts by watch­dog groups to per­suade the reg­u­lat­ory com­mis­sion to re­quire re­act­ors to pro­tect against such at­tacks have been met with in­dustry res­ist­ance and have proved largely un­suc­cess­ful. However, Ku­per­man sug­ges­ted that the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment could play a role in provid­ing such de­fenses dir­ectly, rather than by pla­cing the bur­den en­tirely on nuc­le­ar en­ergy util­it­ies.

In­dustry has bristled at some past ef­forts by the gov­ern­ment to provide this form of as­sist­ance, though, Ku­per­man said. His re­port cites an in­cid­ent in which the Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment deemed the wa­ter in­take struc­ture at the Mill­stone nuc­le­ar power plant in Con­necti­c­ut to be a vul­ner­ab­il­ity and offered to provide pro­tect­ive bar­ri­ers for free. The privately run fa­cil­ity re­jec­ted the DHS of­fer, Ku­per­man said, not­ing that the bar­ri­ers might have ad­ded to the plant op­er­at­or’s main­ten­ance costs.

The Nuc­le­ar En­ergy In­sti­tute, which rep­res­ents the atom­ic power in­dustry, re­spon­ded to the re­port on Thursday with a blog post as­sert­ing that nuc­le­ar plants “are widely ac­know­ledged to be the best-de­fen­ded fa­cil­it­ies among the na­tion’s crit­ic­al in­fra­struc­ture.”

The nuc­le­ar sec­tor’s lob­by­ing arm ar­gued that the FBI and Home­land Se­cur­ity De­part­ment share this po­s­i­tion, but provided only links to the fed­er­al en­tit­ies’ In­ter­net home pages rather than to spe­cif­ic gov­ern­ment re­ports sup­port­ing the claim.

“Ap­prox­im­ately 9,000 ex­tremely well-armed and highly trained se­cur­ity of­ficers de­fend the na­tion’s 62 nuc­le­ar power plant sites,” the NEI re­sponse ad­ded. “This is an in­crease of ap­prox­im­ately 60 per­cent in the size of nuc­le­ar plant se­cur­ity forces since 9/11.”

The in­dustry group said, however, that the type of at­tack that Ku­per­man’s re­port ad­dresses would con­sti­tute “an en­emy-of-the-state in­cur­sion with­in our coun­try,” for which it is not “the ob­lig­a­tion of any elec­tric util­ity to de­fend against.” This, in­stead, is a “job for the highest levels of fed­er­al na­tion­al se­cur­ity,” the group said.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×