White House Seeks U.N. Inquiry on Alleged New Syrian Chem Strike

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Aug. 21, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

The White House on Wed­nes­day con­demned the pos­sible new use of chem­ic­al weapons in Syr­ia and called for a U.N. team now in the Middle East na­tion to in­vest­ig­ate with ur­gency.

“The United States is deeply con­cerned by re­ports that hun­dreds of Syr­i­an ci­vil­ians have been killed in an at­tack by Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment forces, in­clud­ing by the use of chem­ic­al weapons, near Dam­as­cus earli­er today,” Josh Earn­est, Pres­id­ent Obama’s prin­cip­al deputy press sec­ret­ary, said in a re­leased state­ment. “We are work­ing ur­gently to gath­er ad­di­tion­al in­form­a­tion.”

The spokes­man called on “those re­spons­ible for the use of chem­ic­al weapons” to “be held ac­count­able.”

The White House said it form­ally was re­quest­ing that Swedish arms ex­pert Ake Sell­strom and his U.N.-sponsored team probe the new al­leg­a­tions. The in­vest­ig­at­ors ar­rived in the Middle East na­tion late last week to look in­to three claims of pri­or chem­ic­al-arms use.

“The U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ive team, which is cur­rently in Syr­ia, is pre­pared” to in­vest­ig­ate the latest pos­sible chem­ic­al as­sault, “and that is con­sist­ent with its pur­pose and man­date,” Earn­est said. “For the U.N.’s ef­forts to be cred­ible, they must have im­me­di­ate ac­cess to wit­nesses and af­fected in­di­vidu­als, and have the abil­ity to ex­am­ine and col­lect phys­ic­al evid­ence without any in­ter­fer­ence or ma­nip­u­la­tion from the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment.

“If the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment has noth­ing to hide and is truly com­mit­ted to an im­par­tial and cred­ible in­vest­ig­a­tion of chem­ic­al weapons use in Syr­ia,” the spokes­man ad­ded, “it will fa­cil­it­ate the U.N. team’s im­me­di­ate and un­fettered ac­cess to this site.”

Sell­strom earli­er in the day ex­pressed his own in­terest in in­vest­ig­at­ing the fresh al­leg­a­tions of a ma­jor tox­ic gas strike, say­ing that he would lead the in­quiry in­to the pos­sible new at­tack if na­tions from around the globe re­ques­ted it, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted.

Re­ports of massive cas­u­al­ties from the in­cid­ent “sound sus­pi­cious,” and it ap­pears to be “something we need to look in­to,” Sell­strom told SVT tele­vi­sion on Wed­nes­day. “It will de­pend on wheth­er any U.N. mem­ber state goes to the sec­ret­ary gen­er­al and says we should look at this event. We are in place,” Re­u­ters quoted him as say­ing.

U.N. Sec­ret­ary Gen­er­al Ban Ki-moon is “aware of the re­ports,” his of­fice tweeted. “We are try­ing to find out more.”

Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad’s gov­ern­ment has re­jec­ted rebel as­ser­tions that its forces launched chem­ic­al rock­et strikes on the out­skirts of Dam­as­cus, Re­u­ters said sep­ar­ately. Re­por­ted death tolls from the al­leged as­sault con­flic­ted, but reached in­to the hun­dreds and pos­sibly totaled more than 1,000.

Brit­ish For­eign Sec­ret­ary Wil­li­am Hag­ue said his coun­try would refer the in­cid­ent to the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil, and he urged the As­sad re­gime “to al­low im­me­di­ate ac­cess to the area for the U.N. team,” Re­u­ters re­por­ted. France, Ger­many, Tur­key and the 22-na­tion Ar­ab League each in­di­vidu­ally re­ques­ted that the United Na­tions ex­pand its in­vest­ig­a­tion to in­clude the latest claims.

Rus­sia also re­portedly called for a fair and pro­fes­sion­al in­vest­ig­a­tion in­to the new al­leged at­tack. For­eign Min­istry Spokes­man Al­ex­an­der Lukashev­icha said the in­cid­ent’s tim­ing sug­gests it is a “pre-planned pro­voca­tion.”

Former U.N. arms in­vest­ig­at­or Rolf Ekeus told Re­u­ters that “it would be very pe­cu­li­ar if it was the gov­ern­ment to do this at the ex­act mo­ment the in­ter­na­tion­al in­spect­ors come in­to the coun­try.”

“At the least, it wouldn’t be very clev­er,” he ad­ded. The latest event would be sim­pler to as­sess than the past al­leged strikes, be­cause “it is easi­er to do sampling and test­ing, and also to look at the vic­tims, if there are sick people or even dead people (on the scene),” the wire ser­vice sep­ar­ately quoted him as say­ing. “It is easi­er to get to doc­tors and get to the place where the event happened.”

A former European Uni­on In­sti­tute chem­ic­al weapons ana­lyst said he was “skep­tic­al” of pri­or chem­ic­al at­tack re­ports emer­ging from Syr­ia, but “it is clear that something ter­rible has happened” in the latest in­cid­ent.

“The scenes could not have been stage-man­aged,” he wrote in a Wed­nes­day blog post. “However, it is ex­tremely puzz­ling that gov­ern­ment forces would launch a chem­ic­al at­tack pre­cisely at the mo­ment when U.N. in­spect­ors are fi­nally in the coun­try to in­vest­ig­ate some of the earli­er al­leg­a­tions.”

Earn­est, the White House spokes­man, said Wash­ing­ton ad­di­tion­ally has “called for ur­gent con­sulta­tions in the U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil to dis­cuss these al­leg­a­tions and to call for the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment to provide im­me­di­ate ac­cess to the U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ive team.”

The United States, he said, was ur­ging “all Syr­i­an parties in­clud­ing the gov­ern­ment and op­pos­i­tion, to provide im­me­di­ate ac­cess to any and all sites of im­port­ance to the in­vest­ig­a­tion and to en­sure se­cur­ity for the U.N. in­vest­ig­at­ive team.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×