House GOP Plans Mega-Hearing on Climate Change

None

House subcommittee on Energy and Power Chairman Rep. Ed Whitfield, R-Ky., presides over a hearing on the "Energy Tax Prevention Act of 2011, Wednesday, Feb. 9, 2011, on Capitol Hill in Washington. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)  
National Journal
Amy Harder
Aug. 21, 2013, 3 p.m.

After vir­tu­ally ig­nor­ing the na­tion’s biggest en­vir­on­ment­al is­sue for years, Re­pub­lic­an lead­ers of the House En­ergy and Com­merce Com­mit­tee are plan­ning a ma­jor hear­ing on cli­mate change on Sept. 18 and are in­vit­ing lead­ers of 13 fed­er­al agen­cies to testi­fy. It will be the first time since Pres­id­ent Obama un­veiled his cli­mate ac­tion plan in June that ad­min­is­tra­tion of­fi­cials will testi­fy on Cap­it­ol Hill about the agenda.

En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee Chair­man Ed Whit­field, R-Ky., who will preside over the hear­ing, sent out let­ters Aug. 6 in­vit­ing testi­mony from lead­ers of the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency; the de­part­ments of Ag­ri­cul­ture, De­fense, En­ergy, Health and Hu­man Ser­vices, In­teri­or, State, and Trans­port­a­tion; the Na­tion­al Ocean­ic and At­mo­spher­ic Ad­min­is­tra­tion in the Com­merce De­part­ment; NASA; the U.S. Agency for In­ter­na­tion­al De­vel­op­ment; the Ex­port-Im­port Bank; and the White House Of­fice of Sci­ence and Tech­no­logy.

In the let­ters, Whit­field asks nine ques­tions about how each agency de­votes its time, money, and re­sources to cli­mate-change policies and re­quests each of­fi­cial to in­clude an­swers in his or her writ­ten testi­mony at the hear­ing. The sub­com­mit­tee had asked the agen­cies to re­spond by Wed­nes­day about who will testi­fy. By press time Wed­nes­day even­ing, only the De­fense De­part­ment had con­firmed it will provide a wit­ness, al­though a Pentagon spokes­per­son was not able to provide the name. The sub­com­mit­tee ex­pects to con­firm more wit­nesses in the com­ing days.

If it provides a wit­ness, EPA will likely be the star of the hear­ing. Ad­min­is­trat­or Gina Mc­Carthy had not con­firmed by Wed­nes­day even­ing wheth­er she or someone on her be­half would testi­fy. EPA reg­u­la­tions are the center­piece of Obama’s cli­mate plan, and by the time the hear­ing oc­curs in mid-Septem­ber, EPA should be just days away from an­noun­cing draft rules for con­trolling green­house-gas emis­sions from new power plants. When Obama an­nounced his cli­mate plan in June, he gave EPA a Sept. 20 dead­line to an­nounce these reg­u­la­tions, which will be re­pur­posed from ones the agency ini­tially pro­posed last year.

The hear­ing, en­titled “The Obama Ad­min­is­tra­tion’s Cli­mate Change Policies and Activ­it­ies,” will touch on the sci­ence un­der­pin­ning glob­al cli­mate change. A draft of a ma­jor United Na­tions re­port leaked to Re­u­ters earli­er this week showed that the pan­el of sci­entif­ic ex­perts writ­ing the U.N.’s In­ter­gov­ern­ment­al Pan­el on Cli­mate Change re­port is at least 95 per­cent cer­tain that hu­man activ­ity — primar­ily burn­ing of fossil fuels — is the biggest cause of glob­al warm­ing since the 1950s. The IP­CC is the primary guide coun­tries use when de­cid­ing how to con­front cli­mate change.

“The idea is to fo­cus it on the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s cli­mate-change policy; ob­vi­ously sci­ence is an in­teg­ral part of that,” said a Re­pub­lic­an com­mit­tee aide, who ad­ded that it will be “quite a pro­duc­tion” cov­er­ing a wide ar­ray of is­sues re­lated to cli­mate change.

Over the past two years, House En­ergy and Com­merce Chair­man Fred Up­ton, R-Mich., and Whit­field have ig­nored nu­mer­ous let­ters from En­ergy and Com­merce rank­ing mem­ber Henry Wax­man, D-Cal­if., and En­ergy and Power Sub­com­mit­tee rank­ing mem­ber Bobby Rush, D-Ill., re­quest­ing a hear­ing on cli­mate change and the latest sci­ence sur­round­ing the is­sue. In the last Con­gress, the two Demo­crats sent 21 let­ters, ac­cord­ing to their count. Up­ton and Whit­field re­spon­ded to just one of those re­quests, in March of this year.

“We ab­so­lutely should hear from Ad­min­is­tra­tion wit­nesses about the threat of cli­mate change,” Wax­man said in a state­ment to Na­tion­al Journ­al Daily. “We also should be hear­ing from the na­tion’s lead­ing sci­ent­ists. Ever since the Re­pub­lic­ans took over, the Com­mit­tee has been AWOL on the biggest en­ergy is­sue fa­cing the na­tion. It’s an em­bar­rass­ing re­cord that needs to change.”

The agency heads the sub­com­mit­tee has re­ques­ted to testi­fy are: Mc­Carthy; En­ergy Sec­ret­ary Ern­est Mon­iz; HHS Sec­ret­ary Kath­leen Se­beli­us; Ag­ri­cul­ture Sec­ret­ary Tom Vil­sack; Trans­port­a­tion Sec­ret­ary An­thony Foxx; In­teri­or Sec­ret­ary Sally Jew­ell; De­fense Sec­ret­ary Chuck Hagel; Sec­ret­ary of State John Kerry; USAID Ad­min­is­trat­or Rajiv Shah; Ex­port-Im­port Bank Chair­man and Pres­id­ent Fred Hoch­berg; White House Sci­ence and Tech­no­logy Dir­ect­or John Hold­ren; NOAA Ad­min­is­trat­or Kath­ryn Sul­li­van; and NASA Ad­min­is­trat­or Charles Bolden Jr.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×