INSIDE WASHINGTON

What Sports Would Washingtonians Win If They Hosted the Olympics?

None

A man texts while walking in downtown Palo Alto, Calif., Wednesday, June 30, 2010. 
AP
Marin Cogan Scott Bland Josh Kraushaar
See more stories about...
Marin Cogan Scott Bland Josh Kraushaar
Aug. 29, 2013, 10:01 a.m.

Medalers

If any news story was able to pen­et­rate the hive mind of the polit­ic­al-me­dia class last week, bey­ond the freak­ing out over Mi­ley Cyr­us’s Video Mu­sic Awards per­form­ance (along with, you know, the freak­ing out over the pos­sib­il­ity of an at­tack on Syr­ia), it was word that Wash­ing­ton might be get­ting an­oth­er shot at host­ing the Olympics, in 2024. On Tues­day, Bob Sweeney, head of the Great­er Wash­ing­ton Sports Al­li­ance, an­nounced the launch of D.C. 2024, a non­profit aimed at ex­plor­ing a bid for the Sum­mer Games. The dream to bring the Olympics to Wash­ing­ton is still many years and many bil­lions of dol­lars away from be­com­ing a real­ity. But it did in­spire something al­most as rare as an Olympic event: an ac­tu­ally kind of funny D.C.-cent­ric Twit­ter hasht­ag. Some of our fa­vor­ites from #dco­lympicevents: single track­ing (@tech­n0crat­ic); tweet­ing while walk­ing (@john­son); kick­ing the can (@petes­chroeder); punt­ing on le­gis­la­tion (@daniel­strauss4); run­ning of the in­terns (@as­mith83); and soft­ball with Chris Mat­thews (@ry­an­beck­with.) But, as with all good things here, the qual­ity and pop­ular­ity of the hasht­ag were in­versely pro­por­tion­al. By Wed­nes­day, one-liners about red tape and pro­ced­ur­al hurdles were clog­ging the Twit­ter stream.

Mar­in Cogan

Rocky Roads

Out­side groups are spend­ing money earli­er than ever, but miss­ing from all the ac­tion: cash-flush Amer­ic­an Cross­roads, the GOP grand­daddy of su­per PACs. Cross­roads not­ably stayed out of the spe­cial Sen­ate elec­tion in Mas­sachu­setts, be­liev­ing the race was un­winnable. It didn’t want to touch Mark San­ford in South Car­o­lina’s spe­cial House elec­tion in the 1st Dis­trict. But the group also isn’t spend­ing money to soften vul­ner­able Dem in­cum­bents such as Mark Pry­or or Mary Landrieu; at this point in 2011, it had already at­tacked Claire Mc­Caskill. (Its roster of Mc­Con­nell alums en­sures in­volve­ment in Ken­tucky.) More im­port­ant, dona­tions to Amer­ic­an Cross­roads are down sig­ni­fic­antly in the off-year. Through the first six months of 2013, it raised $1.86 mil­lion. Dur­ing the same peri­od in 2011, it raised $3.93 mil­lion. After Cross­roads lost 11 of 13 Sen­ate races it spent money on in 2012, big donors are less will­ing to pony up. The oth­er reas­on: its re­newed fo­cus on per­suad­ing Re­pub­lic­ans to sup­port im­mig­ra­tion re­form. That shift from polit­ics to policy came up short, fail­ing to con­vince its tar­gets des­pite the ad blitz. Cross­roads helped fash­ion the cur­rent cam­paign fin­ance world, and it’ll play a pivotal role in 2014. But with more money from up­starts be­ing spent earli­er, it risks be­ing left be­hind.

Scott Bland and Josh Kraush­aar

Mur­murs

Air Mar­shal Pres­id­ent Obama is ex­pec­ted to nom­in­ate Janet Mc­Cabe, a deputy ad­min­is­trat­or at the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s clean-air of­fice, to head that di­vi­sion, ac­cord­ing to sources fa­mil­i­ar with his think­ing. The po­s­i­tion would put Mc­Cabe at the heart of the pres­id­ent’s his­tor­ic, and con­tro­ver­sial, glob­al-warm­ing agenda. She would be charged with craft­ing massive new pol­lu­tion reg­u­la­tions af­fect­ing coal-fired power plants — rules that could even­tu­ally freeze the na­tion’s coal in­dustry but also po­s­i­tion the U.S. as a glob­al lead­er on cli­mate change. She will step in­to the shoes of her boss, Gina Mc­Carthy, who was con­firmed last month as EPA’s chief. While Mc­Carthy will be the pub­lic face of the new cli­mate-change reg­u­la­tions, Mc­Cabe will act as her right-hand wo­man, tak­ing on the bur­den of draft­ing and leg­ally bul­let­proof­ing the rules, as well as work­ing with all the stake­hold­ers they’ll af­fect — states, elec­tric util­it­ies, con­sumers, and en­vir­on­ment­al ad­voc­ates. It’s likely that Mc­Cabe could face a tough con­firm­a­tion pro­cess. Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans held up Mc­Carthy’s con­firm­a­tion for more than 100 days.

Medalers

If any news story was able to pen­et­rate the hive mind of the polit­ic­al-me­dia class last week, bey­ond the freak­ing out over Mi­ley Cyr­us’s Video Mu­sic Awards per­form­ance (along with, you know, the freak­ing out over the pos­sib­il­ity of an at­tack on Syr­ia), it was word that Wash­ing­ton might be get­ting an­oth­er shot at host­ing the Olympics, in 2024. On Tues­day, Bob Sweeney, head of the Great­er Wash­ing­ton Sports Al­li­ance, an­nounced the launch of D.C. 2024, a non­profit aimed at ex­plor­ing a bid for the Sum­mer Games. The dream to bring the Olympics to Wash­ing­ton is still many years and many bil­lions of dol­lars away from be­com­ing a real­ity. But it did in­spire something al­most as rare as an Olympic event: an ac­tu­ally kind of funny D.C.-cent­ric Twit­ter hasht­ag. Some of our fa­vor­ites from #dco­lympicevents: single track­ing (@tech­n0crat­ic); tweet­ing while walk­ing (@john­son); kick­ing the can (@petes­chroeder); punt­ing on le­gis­la­tion (@daniel­strauss4); run­ning of the in­terns (@as­mith83); and soft­ball with Chris Mat­thews (@ry­an­beck­with.) But, as with all good things here, the qual­ity and pop­ular­ity of the hasht­ag were in­versely pro­por­tion­al. By Wed­nes­day, one-liners about red tape and pro­ced­ur­al hurdles were clog­ging the Twit­ter stream.

Mar­in Cogan

Rocky Roads

Out­side groups are spend­ing money earli­er than ever, but miss­ing from all the ac­tion: cash-flush Amer­ic­an Cross­roads, the GOP grand­daddy of su­per PACs. Cross­roads not­ably stayed out of the spe­cial Sen­ate elec­tion in Mas­sachu­setts, be­liev­ing the race was un­winnable. It didn’t want to touch Mark San­ford in South Car­o­lina’s spe­cial House elec­tion in the 1st Dis­trict. But the group also isn’t spend­ing money to soften vul­ner­able Dem in­cum­bents such as Mark Pry­or or Mary Landrieu; at this point in 2011, it had already at­tacked Claire Mc­Caskill. (Its roster of Mc­Con­nell alums en­sures in­volve­ment in Ken­tucky.) More im­port­ant, dona­tions to Amer­ic­an Cross­roads are down sig­ni­fic­antly in the off-year. Through the first six months of 2013, it raised $1.86 mil­lion. Dur­ing the same peri­od in 2011, it raised $3.93 mil­lion. After Cross­roads lost 11 of 13 Sen­ate races it spent money on in 2012, big donors are less will­ing to pony up. The oth­er reas­on: its re­newed fo­cus on per­suad­ing Re­pub­lic­ans to sup­port im­mig­ra­tion re­form. That shift from polit­ics to policy came up short, fail­ing to con­vince its tar­gets des­pite the ad blitz. Cross­roads helped fash­ion the cur­rent cam­paign fin­ance world, and it’ll play a pivotal role in 2014. But with more money from up­starts be­ing spent earli­er, it risks be­ing left be­hind.

Scott Bland and Josh Kraush­aar

Murmurs

Air Mar­shal Pres­id­ent Obama is ex­pec­ted to nom­in­ate Janet Mc­Cabe, a deputy ad­min­is­trat­or at the En­vir­on­ment­al Pro­tec­tion Agency’s clean-air of­fice, to head that di­vi­sion, ac­cord­ing to sources fa­mil­i­ar with his think­ing. The po­s­i­tion would put Mc­Cabe at the heart of the pres­id­ent’s his­tor­ic, and con­tro­ver­sial, glob­al-warm­ing agenda. She would be charged with craft­ing massive new pol­lu­tion reg­u­la­tions af­fect­ing coal-fired power plants — rules that could even­tu­ally freeze the na­tion’s coal in­dustry but also po­s­i­tion the U.S. as a glob­al lead­er on cli­mate change. She will step in­to the shoes of her boss, Gina Mc­Carthy, who was con­firmed last month as EPA’s chief. While Mc­Carthy will be the pub­lic face of the new cli­mate-change reg­u­la­tions, Mc­Cabe will act as her right-hand wo­man, tak­ing on the bur­den of draft­ing and leg­ally bul­let­proof­ing the rules, as well as work­ing with all the stake­hold­ers they’ll af­fect — states, elec­tric util­it­ies, con­sumers, and en­vir­on­ment­al ad­voc­ates. It’s likely that Mc­Cabe could face a tough con­firm­a­tion pro­cess. Sen­ate Re­pub­lic­ans held up Mc­Carthy’s con­firm­a­tion for more than 100 days.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×