The Terrible History of Human Shields

The possible use of human shields in Syria has a long precedent in some miserable history.

In this citizen journalism image provided by The Syrian Revolution against Bashar Assad which has been authenticated based on its contents and other AP reporting, a Syrian military tank caught on fire during clashes with Free Syrian army fighters in Joubar a suburb of Damascus, Syria, Wednesday, Sept. 4, 2013. 
National Journal
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Sept. 4, 2013, 8:44 a.m.

The Mon­gols pierced holes in­to the hands of their fe­male Ja­pan­ese cap­tives. They threaded ropes through the holes to con­nect the wo­men to­geth­er in a long line, and made them march ahead of the Mon­gol sol­diers as a hu­man shield, lead­ing in­to Ja­pan’s fort­resses. 

This is said to have taken place in the late 13th cen­tury. But the ter­rible story of hu­man shields doesn’t end there.

There are new re­ports this week that the As­sad re­gime in Syr­ia is mov­ing troops in­to ci­vil­ian areas ahead of a pos­sible U.S. mis­sile strike, and pos­sibly pla­cing pris­on­ers in mil­it­ary sites. It’s the kind of jaw-drop­ping mil­it­ary tac­tic that is typ­ic­ally scorned by the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity, and ex­pli­citly banned by the Fourth Geneva Con­ven­tion (of which Syr­ia is a party). It’s also the kind of tac­tic that, if used dur­ing a pos­sible U.S. strike, has the po­ten­tial to com­pletely de­ter and de­grade the Obama ad­min­is­tra­tion’s plans for quick, re­l­at­ively pain­less, and lim­ited ac­tion.

This isn’t the first time we’ve heard of the Syr­i­an re­gime pos­sibly us­ing hu­man shields. The U.N. an­nu­al re­port on Chil­dren and Armed Con­flict re­leased in June 2012 in­cluded the Syr­i­an armed forces on the list of parties that re­cruit, use, or ab­use chil­dren in armed con­flict. The re­port spe­cific­ally ac­cused Syr­i­an troops of us­ing chil­dren as young as 8 as hu­man shields dur­ing raids. In March, based on wit­ness re­ports, Hu­man Rights Watch ac­cused the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment of hav­ing “en­dangered loc­al res­id­ents by for­cing them to march in front of the army dur­ing re­cent ar­rest op­er­a­tions, troop move­ments, and at­tacks on towns and vil­lages in north­ern Syr­ia.”

Among tyr­an­nic­al re­gimes, the use of hu­man shields has an in­fam­ous re­cent his­tory. NATO wor­ried that forces loy­al to Libya’s Muam­mar el-Qad­dafi were us­ing ci­vil­ians to pro­tect them­selves in April 2011. Liby­an rebels claimed that Au­gust that the gov­ern­ment was us­ing hu­man shields in Qad­dafi’s birth­place of Sirte.

But per­haps the most no­tori­ous re­cent pro­ponent of hu­man shields was Ir­aq’s Sad­dam Hus­sein. Hus­sein used “thou­sands of for­eign and Ir­aqi ci­vil­ians as hu­man shields in bids to ma­nip­u­late do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al opin­ion and de­ter mil­it­ary ac­tion against his re­gime” when he was in con­flict with the West, ac­cord­ing to a Janu­ary 2003 CIA re­port. The CIA al­leges that in 1990, Hus­sein “held more than 800 West­ern, Ja­pan­ese, and Kuwaiti na­tion­als” in Ir­aq and Kuwait to de­fend his re­gime from an at­tack to end its in­va­sion of Kuwait. In 1997, Hus­sein “en­ticed or co­erced” thou­sands of Ir­aqi ci­vil­ians to act as vol­un­tary hu­man shields to ward against an at­tack after Ir­aq re­fused to let U.N. in­spect­ors in­to some sites. Ir­aqi men, wo­men, and chil­dren served as hu­man shields at roughly 80 palaces and fa­cil­it­ies dur­ing the crisis.

The CIA re­port was re­leased at a sig­ni­fic­ant time, just months ahead of “shock and awe” and the be­gin­ning of Amer­ica’s war with Ir­aq. For his part, Pres­id­ent Bush warned in a Feb­ru­ary 2003 speech that Hus­sein “re­gards the Ir­aqi people as hu­man shields.” The CIA re­port ex­pressed con­cern that the Ir­aqi re­gime was again pre­par­ing to use hu­man shields ahead of a co­ali­tion strike, and was act­ively court­ing vo­lun­teers from in­ter­na­tion­al an­ti­war groups.

Those vo­lun­teers, in­clud­ing Amer­ic­an and Brit­ish act­iv­ists, showed up and were wel­comed with open arms. They stayed in cushy Bagh­dad ho­tels, and it was “al­most like be­ing on hol­i­day,” one of the act­iv­ists said in a March 2013 BBC in­ter­view. To their chag­rin, the act­iv­ists wound up be­ing moved by an Ir­aqi li­ais­on to in­fra­struc­ture sites, not big ci­vil­ian areas. By the time the bomb­ings oc­curred, there were between 25 and 100 hu­man-shield act­iv­ists in the coun­try, and none of the sites they were pro­tect­ing were hit.

Now act­iv­ists have ar­rived in Syr­ia, too. Ac­cord­ing to Ir­an’s PressTV and Rus­sia’s RT, Syr­i­ans call­ing them­selves a hu­man shield have crowded around some mil­it­ary build­ings in the coun­try. “I’m a nor­mal cit­izen, I’m not a gov­ern­ment em­ploy­ee, and I do not do any­thing in the gov­ern­ment,” a wo­man says in an in­ter­view with PressTV. “When I heard about this cam­paign, I came with my fam­ily.”

An­ti­war pro­test­ers with du­bi­ous back­ing and re­ports of re­gime use of hu­man shields didn’t work to halt a U.S. at­tack on Ir­aq in 2003. With a po­ten­tial hu­man-shield crisis on our hands again, we’ll soon see if a pos­sible ci­vil­ian dis­aster can be avoided.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×