Bashar al-Assad Tells Charlie Rose Congress Will Get in Obama’s Way on Syria … in 2010

On Monday night, PBS will air a new interview between Charlie Rose and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad. But it’s not the first time the two have met.

Syrian President Bashar Assad leaves the Elysee Palace following his meeting with his French counterpart Nicolas Sarkozy, in Paris, Friday Nov. 13, 2009. Assad says that Mideast peace will be the main issue in his talks with President Nicolas Sarkozy and that "France must act." (AP Photo/Remy de la Mauviniere)
ASSOCIATED PRESS
Matt Berman
Sept. 9, 2013, 6:47 a.m.

“I trust Sen­at­or Kerry, and I think he is earn­est,” Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad told PBS’s Charlie Rose. “I’m con­vinced Pres­id­ent Obama wants to do something pos­it­ive [on Middle East peace],” he con­tin­ued. “But I’m not con­vinced that the in­sti­tu­tion would al­low Pres­id­ent Obama to do what he wants to do with Syr­ia and in oth­er sub­jects and is­sues.”

This was in May, 2010. In a lengthy in­ter­view with Rose, As­sad re­flec­ted on re­la­tions between the U.S. and Syr­ia, and on how John Kerry, then chair­man of the Sen­ate For­eign Re­la­tions Com­mit­tee, and the pres­id­ent were look­ing to im­prove the re­la­tion­ship.

Three years later, much is dif­fer­ent. In a new in­ter­view with Rose on the eve of pos­sible U.S. strikes against Syr­ia, As­sad says that his coun­try will look to re­tali­ate if an at­tack does hap­pen, and that the U.S. and its al­lies should “ex­pect every ac­tion.” But as As­sad said in 2010, “the in­sti­tu­tion” — also known as Con­gress — may not just let Obama do what he wants. 

Here are the high­lights from As­sad’s 2010 in­ter­view, with the full video.

As­sad on the United States’ track re­cord in the Middle East

We are won­der­ing about what strategy the United States has to­ward the dif­fer­ent con­flict, wheth­er Ir­aq, Afgh­anistan, peace pro­cess, and any oth­er main con­flict. But I’m talk­ing about dif­fer­ent ad­min­is­tra­tions, not only this ad­min­is­tra­tion. The ques­tion that we asked too many of­fi­cials is, what is your strategy? They only put the title of sta­bil­ity, but sta­bil­ity is the fi­nal — is the goal of all — the fi­nal stage or the fi­nal end of solv­ing all the oth­er prob­lems.

So the United States ad­min­is­tra­tion has been fail­ing, fail­ing, and fail­ing, in still solv­ing the prob­lems. Why? This is re­lated to what I said that the re­gion has changed. They have to ad­opt dif­fer­ent ap­proach to­ward our re­gion. They can­not ad­opt the same ap­proach.

On the role the U.S. should play in the re­gion

If they want to play the role of the ar­bit­er, they can­not play that role while they are sided with the Is­rael­is. They have to be im­par­tial ar­bit­er. They are not. And they were nev­er im­par­tial ar­bit­ers since the be­gin­ning of the peace pro­cess. 

They have to gain the trust of the dif­fer­ent play­ers. If you don’t have good re­la­tions with Syr­ia, how can Syr­ia de­pend on you as ar­bit­er?

On his re­la­tion­ship with John Kerry

I trust Sen­at­or Kerry. I trust Sen­at­or Kerry, and I think he is earn­est. And I met him five times be­fore this meet­ing. I met him five times in very dif­fi­cult cir­cum­stances. So what he said, he said what he means.

On the U.S. polit­ic­al sys­tem

CHARLIE ROSE: You seem to be say­ing that Pres­id­ent Obama has the right ideas but you’re not sure that he can act on them.

AS­SAD: No, be­cause he can­not, be­cause you have in­sti­tu­tions in the United States. You have your polit­ic­al sys­tem. It is not only the pres­id­ent. If it’s only the pres­id­ent, we could blame the pres­id­ent. We can say that he didn’t do what he had to do.

But you have the in­sti­tu­tions and you have the Con­gress. For ex­ample, the am­bas­sad­or to Syr­ia who was about to come, but the Con­gress, the Re­pub­lic­ans in the Con­gress op­posed it re­cently. So that is why I said it’s not that the pres­id­ent doesn’t want to or he can­not do something. It is about the whole polit­ic­al sys­tem that you have in the United States. And you know more than me about it.

On U.S. un­der­stand­ing of Ir­an and the Middle East

They mis­un­der­stand the re­gion, def­in­itely. And that some­times is nor­mal be­cause it is dif­fer­ent cul­ture very far away.

But after the 11th of Septem­ber, at least after the 11th of Septem­ber, you should learn more about what is hap­pen­ing be­hind the ocean. It is not about what you think. It is about what we think. They have to un­der­stand the so­ci­ety, the cul­ture in this re­gion, and in the rest of the world that this re­gion, be­cause it is com­plic­ated….

They don’t un­der­stand that we want peace. But if you want peace, it doesn’t mean — to sign’s peace treaty, it doesn’t mean we sign ca­pit­u­la­tion agree­ment. That’s what they don’t un­der­stand. There is a big dif­fer­ent between ca­pit­u­la­tion agree­ment and peace treaty.

Peace treaty means hav­ing all your rights. This is the second about Ir­an, the nuc­le­ar is­sue. The nuc­le­ar fight is about Ir­an hav­ing the right to have peace­ful nuc­le­ar re­act­or. You can­not deal with Ir­an through the Se­cur­ity Coun­cil through threats.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×