Barbara Lee’s Rebellion: The Making of the Left’s Antiwar Voice on Syria

Once she received death threats for her antiwar politics. Now the rest of the country is beginning to catch up with the congresswoman from Berkeley.

Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Calif., walks away after speaking to the media with other members of the Congressional Black Caucus, after a meeting with President Barack Obama at the White House in Washington Thursday, March 11, 2010.(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
National Journal
Lucia Graves
Sept. 9, 2013, 8:52 a.m.

There was a time when Rep. Bar­bara Lee was ac­cused of treas­on and got so many death threats for her an­ti­war polit­ics she needed around-the-clock po­lice pro­tec­tion. Now, a dec­ade and two un­pop­u­lar wars later, the con­gress­wo­man who cast the only vote against the war in Afgh­anistan has moved from the fringe to the fore­front, be­com­ing a pree­m­in­ent voice in the pres­id­ent’s own party against his ef­fort to bomb Syr­ia.

Lee is an in­flu­en­tial mem­ber of both the Con­gres­sion­al Pro­gress­ive Caucus and the Con­gres­sion­al Black Caucus — two groups Pres­id­ent Obama des­per­ately needs on his side. In­side Con­gress, she has helped spear­head the lob­by­ing ef­fort against a Syr­ia strike, and she was among the more prom­in­ent mem­bers of the CPC briefed by the White House last week. “They’ve been very per­suas­ive about the in­tel­li­gence and the fact that we must do something,” she told The Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Greg Sar­gent. What was less per­suas­ive, she said, was the idea that the only op­tion right now is a mil­it­ary op­tion.

“I’m not a pa­ci­fist,” Lee told Na­tion­al Journ­al in an in­ter­view. “I think we need to hold those ac­count­able for any types of crimes against hu­man­ity, weapons of mass de­struc­tion, chem­ic­al at­tacks on our coun­try. This is a giv­en. We’ve got to do that. But you also have to un­der­stand what you’re do­ing and the con­text.”

The story of how Lee emerged as one of Con­gress’s most power­ful an­ti­war voices on Syr­ia is one that’s well told by num­bers. In 2001 when she voted against the use of force in Afgh­anistan, she ac­ted alone. In 2003, when she sponsored le­gis­la­tion to re­peal the con­gres­sion­al au­thor­iz­a­tion of war in Ir­aq, her le­gis­la­tion re­ceived 72 votes. In Au­gust of 2013, a de­mand that Obama seek au­thor­iz­a­tion from Con­gress be­fore tak­ing any ac­tion against Syr­ia garnered the sup­port of more than 150 law­makers and from both sides of the polit­ic­al aisle.

That most re­cent push on Syr­ia con­sisted of two let­ters sent to Obama last month. One was au­thored by Lee; the oth­er was au­thored by Re­pub­lic­an Rep. Scott Ri­gell of Vir­gin­ia, who has been whip­ping Re­pub­lic­an votes against a strike. Ri­gell, per­haps the closest thing Lee has to a Re­pub­lic­an coun­ter­part on Syr­ia, tweeted his sup­port for Lee’s let­ter in Au­gust:

Just read let­ter sent by @Rep­Bar­bar­aLee to POTUS. Fully agree. #com­mon ground ht­tp://t.co/mws6v7h­C­qK

— Rep. Scott Ri­gell (@RepScot­tRi­gell) Au­gust 29, 2013

Lee also has an al­li­ance on the is­sue with Liber­tari­an-lean­ing Re­pub­lic­ans such as Rep. Justin Amash of Michigan and Sen. Rand Paul of Ken­tucky, who have been out­spoken in their isol­a­tion­ism.

It’s a level of sup­port that seemed un­ima­gin­able back in Septem­ber 2001 when Lee came out against grant­ing then-Pres­id­ent George W. Bush broad au­thor­ity to use mil­it­ary force in Afgh­anistan. The vote oc­curred just three days after the 9/11 at­tacks, when Amer­ica was in still in shock and wanted re­tri­bu­tion. Of the 535 mem­bers of Con­gress, Lee cast the only dis­sent­ing vote.

Fol­low­ing that vote she was called “treach­er­ous,” “treas­on­ous” and a “clue­less lib­er­al.” A con­ser­vat­ive colum­nist wrote, “Ms. Lee is a long-prac­ti­cing sup­port­er of Amer­ica’s en­emies — from Fi­del Castro on down.” And Dav­id Horow­itz in Na­tion­al Re­view called her “an anti-Amer­ic­an com­mun­ist who sup­ports Amer­ica’s en­emies and has act­ively col­lab­or­ated with them in their war against Amer­ica.”

Back then, her po­s­i­tion seemed like polit­ic­al sui­cide, and had she rep­res­en­ted any oth­er part of the coun­try, it might have been. But Lee hails from Berke­ley, Cal­if., a place so an­ti­war that a month after the 9/11 at­tacks, the loc­al fire chief had to pull flags off vehicles for fear that pro­test­ers would rip them off.

Now it seems the rest of the coun­try is be­gin­ning to look a bit more like Berke­ley.

The an­ti­war shift in Con­gress re­flects a deep­er, more mean­ing­ful shift in the coun­try’s opin­ion about Amer­ic­an in­ter­ven­tion­ism. As Na­tion­al Journ­al‘s Ron­ald Brown­stein ob­served, “The un­ease about mil­it­ary ac­tion in Syr­ia has many roots. But its core is a di­min­ished faith that U.S.-led mil­it­ary ac­tions can pro­duce be­ne­fits that ex­ceed their costs, es­pe­cially in the Middle East.” A re­cent poll found Amer­ic­an sup­port for U.S. in­ter­ven­tion in Syr­ia to be lower than for any in­ter­ven­tion in the last 20 years.

And nobody is bet­ter po­si­tioned to cap­it­al­ize on that shift than Lee. While oth­er pro­gress­ive law­makers such as Rep. Alan Grayson of Flor­ida have emerged more re­cently as lead­ing voices in stop­ping a war with Syr­ia, as re­por­ted by The At­lantic‘s Molly Ball, Lee has been there all along.

“There’ve been a num­ber of folks who really ad­mire her prin­cipled stance and look to her as someone who’s will­ing to take those prin­cipled stances when they need to be taken,” said Steph­en Miles, co­ali­tion co­ordin­at­or for Win Without War, a group of or­gan­iz­a­tions that pro­mote a de­mil­it­ar­ized U.S. for­eign policy. In this case, he says, such stances are ne­ces­sary. “You get to choose how wars start but not how they end,” Miles ex­plained. “I think we’re see­ing that play out again in Syr­ia.”

“Con­gress­wo­man Bar­bara Lee is someone who con­sist­ently does the right thing not just when it’s easy but when it’s hard,” said Becky Bond, polit­ic­al dir­ect­or for CREDO Mo­bile, which has been whip­ping votes against a Syr­ia strike and, along with oth­er pro­gress­ive ad­vocacy groups, has or­gan­ized a Monday-night vi­gil. “Lee has been or­gan­iz­ing year in, year out since that vote in 2001,” Bond ad­ded. “She brings to this de­bate his­tory and grav­itas and or­gan­iz­ing power.”

“We love her. We ab­so­lutely love her,” said How­ie Klein of Demo­crat­ic PAC Act­Blue, prais­ing Lee as the “pree­m­in­ent” an­ti­war voice in Con­gress. “She’s someone who I’ve long thought should be part of the Demo­crat­ic lead­er­ship in a real way.”

So far Lee, who loudly called for the pres­id­ent to seek au­thor­iz­a­tion for a Syr­ia strike from Con­gress, feels vic­tori­ous and grate­ful. “I com­pli­ment and thank the pres­id­ent for com­ing to Con­gress,” she told Na­tion­al Journ­al. “That was the right thing to do. But, also, how he has handled this in a very meth­od­ic­al, very ra­tion­al, and very de­lib­er­at­ive fash­ion.”

This week she’s tak­ing the next step, in­tro­du­cing a res­ol­u­tion push­ing the pres­id­ent to con­sult the United Na­tions and the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity on an en­hanced dip­lo­mat­ic strategy to hold Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar al-As­sad’s re­gime ac­count­able, rather than pur­su­ing mil­it­ary force in Syr­ia.

She has oth­er is­sues too that she’s hop­ing will gain trac­tion. A bill in­tro­duced earli­er this year, H.R. 198, would re­voke the au­thor­iz­a­tion for the broad use of mil­it­ary force that Con­gress ap­proved in the days after the 9/11 at­tacks. So far, the bill has 31 co­spon­sors, and a pe­ti­tion on Credo Mo­bil­ize has garnered more than 85,000 sig­na­tures.

There are oth­er, smal­ler signs her cause is gain­ing mo­mentum.

“You know that slo­gan ‘Bar­bara Lee speaks for me?’ ” Credo’s Bond asked Na­tion­al Journ­al. “I’m start­ing to see that pop up in a lot of people’s Face­book feeds.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×