Obama Adviser: Syrian Transitional Body “˜Only Sustainable’ Way to End Bloodshed

None

Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Elaine M. Grossman, Global Security Newswire
Sept. 9, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — U.S. Pres­id­ent Obama’s na­tion­al se­cur­ity ad­viser in­sisted in a Monday speech that the cre­ation of a post-As­sad trans­ition­al au­thor­ity in Syr­ia would be the “only” long-term means of end­ing blood­shed in the Middle East­ern na­tion’s on­go­ing civil war.

“Ul­ti­mately, the only sus­tain­able way to end the suf­fer­ing in Syr­ia is through a ne­go­ti­ated polit­ic­al solu­tion, start­ing with the cre­ation of a rep­res­ent­at­ive trans­ition­al au­thor­ity that or­gan­izes elec­tions and meets the needs of the Syr­i­an people,” said Susan Rice, who has served as the pres­id­ent’s top se­cur­ity aide since Ju­ly. “A cease-fire and a polit­ic­al solu­tion are also, as a prac­tic­al mat­ter, the only way to elim­in­ate com­pletely the Syr­i­an chem­ic­al weapons threat.”

Still, Rice re­it­er­ated ad­min­is­tra­tion state­ments that the pro­posed lim­ited U.S. mil­it­ary strikes against tar­gets re­lated to Syr­ia’s chem­ic­al weapons would not seek to elim­in­ate Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad, who has led the na­tion since his fath­er’s death in 2000.

“These strikes would not aim to topple As­sad or by them­selves to ef­fect re­gime change,” she said, speak­ing be­fore an audi­ence at the New Amer­ica Found­a­tion think tank in Wash­ing­ton. “Do­ing so would re­quire a much lar­ger and sus­tained mil­it­ary cam­paign, put­ting Amer­ic­an forces in the cen­ter of this civil con­flict. And as Pres­id­ent Obama has made clear, it is neither wise nor ne­ces­sary to do so.”

Obama has called for a re­stric­ted at­tack by U.S. armed forces in re­sponse to an Aug. 21 gas at­tack in the Dam­as­cus sub­urb of Ghouta, which his ad­min­is­tra­tion says res­ul­ted in more than 1,400 ci­vil­ian deaths, in­clud­ing many chil­dren. Con­gress is de­bat­ing the pres­id­ent’s push for a bi­par­tis­an res­ol­u­tion au­thor­iz­ing the mil­it­ary ac­tion.

Rice on Monday aimed to bol­ster the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al cam­paign to gen­er­ate sup­port for se­lec­ted mis­sile strikes aimed in­stead at pun­ish­ing the re­gime. At­tack ob­ject­ives would be to de­grade the Syr­i­an mil­it­ary’s ca­pa­city for ad­di­tion­al chem­ic­al at­tacks, and de­ter As­sad or oth­ers in the re­gion from any fur­ther use of weapons of mass de­struc­tion.

The White House ad­viser also overtly tied the pro­posed strikes to a de­sire to send a mes­sage to Ir­an not to de­vel­op a nuc­le­ar-weapon ca­pa­city.

“Coun­ter­ing Syr­ia’s use of chem­ic­al weapons … has im­plic­a­tions for our ef­forts to pre­vent a nuc­le­ar-armed Ir­an,” Rice said. “The policy of the United States is clear: We will not al­low Ir­an to ac­quire a nuc­le­ar weapon. With al­lies and part­ners, we con­tin­ue to pur­sue a com­pre­hens­ive strategy to pre­vent Ir­an from ob­tain­ing a nuc­le­ar weapon, in­clud­ing dip­lomacy, pres­sure and in­creas­ing sanc­tions.”

It also could send a mes­sage more broadly to the re­gion and the world, she said.

“Stand­ing up to Syr­ia’s use of chem­ic­al weapons ad­vances our broad­er goals in the Middle East,” Rice told the audi­ence. “Con­versely, by al­low­ing As­sad to act with im­pun­ity, everything else be­comes even harder, from coun­ter­ing ter­ror­ism to de­fend­ing hu­man rights, from pro­mot­ing peace to en­sur­ing our en­ergy se­cur­ity, and pre­vent­ing the pro­lif­er­a­tion of weapons of mass de­struc­tion.”

Wash­ing­ton’s former am­bas­sad­or to the United Na­tions, Rice im­plied that if the United States failed to re­spond mil­it­ar­ily to the Ghouta at­tack, some around the world might ques­tion U.S. re­solve to re­tali­ate with a “full range” of weaponry avail­able in re­sponse to fu­ture WMD at­tacks. This ap­peared to be a veiled ref­er­ence to Wash­ing­ton’s cred­ib­il­ity in de­ter­ring nuc­le­ar war by threat­en­ing a nuc­le­ar re­sponse.

“Re­ject­ing the lim­ited mil­it­ary ac­tion that Pres­id­ent Obama strongly sup­ports would raise ques­tions around the world as to wheth­er the United States is truly pre­pared to em­ploy the full range of its power to de­fend our na­tion­al in­terest,” Rice said. “Oth­er glob­al hot spots might flare up if bel­li­ger­ents be­lieve the United States can­not be coun­ted on to en­force the most ba­sic and widely ac­cep­ted in­ter­na­tion­al norms.”

Rice sum­mar­ized the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s in­tel­li­gence case for con­clud­ing that the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment was to blame for the Aug. 21 chem­ic­al at­tack, but did not of­fer ad­di­tion­al evid­ence or elab­or­a­tion that some pun­dits are call­ing on the White House to di­vulge as a way of strength­en­ing its pub­lic case for re­tali­ation.

Al­though world lead­ers at the G20 eco­nom­ic sum­mit last week in St. Peters­burg failed to un­an­im­ously of­fer Obama back­ing for his pro­posed mil­it­ary ac­tion, Rice sought to un­der­score grow­ing glob­al sup­port for the lim­ited strikes.

She rattled off 10 G20 na­tions — from Aus­tralia to the United King­dom — that have blamed As­sad for the chem­ic­al at­tacks and signed onto a state­ment say­ing that “those who per­pet­rated these crimes must be held ac­count­able.”

An­oth­er nine na­tions, in­clud­ing Ger­many and Qatar, sub­sequently en­dorsed the state­ment.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×