One Winner in the Syria Debate: Code Pink

After years in the “wilderness,” popular opposition to intervention in Syria has been a shot in the arm for groups such as Code Pink.

Code Pink protester Rae Abileah yells out during the Democratic National Convention in Charlotte, N.C., on Wednesday, Sept. 5, 2012.
National Journal
Alex Seitz-Wald
Sept. 10, 2013, 11:10 a.m.

The corner of New Jer­sey and In­de­pend­ence av­en­ues out­side the Cap­it­ol on Monday night felt a bit like a time warp to the Bush era as Medea Ben­jamin, the long-mar­gin­al­ized founder of the roguish an­ti­war group Code Pink, was sud­denly rel­ev­ant again. Graced by the im­prim­at­ur of at least three mem­bers of Con­gress and sev­er­al ma­jor news out­lets, Ben­jamin whipped up a crowd of about 100 at one of the dozens of an­ti­war ral­lies hap­pen­ing con­cur­rently across the coun­try, and re­marked, “The an­ti­war move­ment is rev­ving back up in a very strong way!”

In re­cent years Ben­jamin, who rose to prom­in­ence lead­ing com­bat­ive protests against the Ir­aq War, has be­came more ac­cus­tomed to heck­ling mem­bers of Con­gress than in­tro­du­cing them at ral­lies. She’s been ma­ligned by the main­stream Left and mocked by the cen­ter (the Right al­ways re­viled her), and dis­missed as speak­ing on be­half of her­self and not many oth­ers. But pop­u­lar op­pos­i­tion to po­ten­tial airs trikes against Syr­ia has been a shot in the arm for her and the rag-tag an­ti­war move­ment, which sud­denly finds it­self be­ing backed by the ma­jor­ity of Amer­ic­ans.

“I feel, on one level, vin­dic­ated, I sup­pose. But on an­oth­er level, I would rather con­tin­ue to be mar­gin­al­ized and not be on a path to war than be in the cen­ter of a new peace in­sur­rec­tion,” Ben­jamin told Na­tion­al Journ­al.

If law­makers ever ac­tu­ally vote on a bill to au­thor­ize strikes against Syr­ia, Obama will need that sup­port un­like at al­most any oth­er point in his pres­id­ency. He can’t count on many Re­pub­lic­an votes and in­stead has con­cen­trated his ef­fort on reach­ing out to House pro­gress­ives, giv­ing the grass­roots Left a pre­cious mo­ment of in­flu­ence after years dom­in­ated by their ideo­lo­gic­al op­pos­ites in the tea party.

Code Pink once had 300 loc­al chapters and plenty of al­lies on the Left, but saw its sup­port evap­or­ate with the rest of the an­ti­war move­ment after a Demo­crat won the White House. Some pro­gress­ive groups were slow to join more rad­ic­al an­ti­war stal­warts such as Ben­jamin, but the lib­er­al po­s­i­tion has so­lid­i­fied in the past week, and now or­gan­iz­a­tions such as Mo­ve­On.org and Credo have start­ing run­ning ads on TV, or­gan­ized thou­sands of calls to mem­bers of Con­gress, col­lec­ted hun­dreds of thou­sands of sig­na­tures, and mo­bil­ized in the street against the pres­id­ent’s plan.

“So many of our col­leagues that were so act­ive on these is­sues dur­ing the Bush years just faded away. Sud­denly we have a lot of col­leagues again,” Ben­jamin said.

While it feels a bit like the anti-Ir­aq War gang is back to­geth­er, 2013 is very dif­fer­ent than 2003 for at least one big reas­on — the party af­fil­i­ation of the oc­cu­pant of the White House.

Ac­cord­ing to Mi­chael Heaney and Fa­bio Ro­jas, pro­fess­ors at the Uni­versity of Michigan and In­di­ana Uni­versity, re­spect­ively, who are work­ing on a book on the an­ti­war move­ment, par­tis­an­ship es­sen­tially sucked the wind out of the move­ment’s sails after Obama’s elec­tion. “Demo­crats, who had been mo­tiv­ated to par­ti­cip­ate by anti-Re­pub­lic­an sen­ti­ments, with­drew from an­ti­war protests when the Demo­crat­ic Party achieved elect­or­al suc­cess,” they wrote in a much-cited 2011 pa­per, based on thou­sands of sur­veys they con­duc­ted with pro­test­ers.

“There’s al­ways a hard­core group that doesn’t care who’s in the White House. They’re al­ways there, but they’re small in num­bers,” Ro­jas told Na­tion­al Journ­al, re­fer­ring to Code Pink and sim­il­ar groups. But with Syr­ia, “It’s mov­ing from what you might call the hard Left to the lib­er­al core of the Demo­crat­ic Party.”

Al­most two-thirds of lib­er­als op­pose at­tack­ing Syr­ia, ac­cord­ing to a Pew sur­vey re­leased Monday. Mo­ve­On polled its mem­bers and found that 73 per­cent op­posed air strikes, while VoteVets, the largest pro­gress­ive vet­er­ans’ group, re­por­ted that 80 per­cent of its mem­ber­ship op­posed in­ter­ven­tion. And at the same time, con­ser­vat­ives have joined pro­gress­ives in ral­ly­ing against mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion un­like any time un­der Bush, pre­sum­ably — at least in part — out of the same kind of par­tis­an mo­tiv­a­tion that pushed Demo­crats to op­pose Bush.

Pro­gress­ive act­iv­ists bristle at the sug­ges­tion that they gave Obama a pass be­cause he’s a Demo­crat. Rather, they say Syr­ia is the latest in a string of con­front­a­tions between the Obama White House and what former White House press sec­ret­ary Robert Gibbs once de­ris­ively re­ferred to as the “pro­fes­sion­al Left.” There was the back­bit­ing over who killed the pub­lic op­tion dur­ing the health care re­form de­bate, Obama’s foot-drag­ging on the Key­stone XL pipeline, and the all-out Demo­crat­ic civil war over the pres­id­ent’s pro­pos­al to trim So­cial Se­cur­ity be­ne­fits.

Those fights, along with the more re­cent bi­par­tis­an up­roar over the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Agency’s snoop­ing on Amer­ic­an cit­izens, helped prime the pump to make it easi­er for lib­er­als to op­pose the White House on Syr­ia than they may have been in years past, act­iv­ists say. “There’s not a lot of good­will left,” said one, who asked not to be named so as to avoid dam­aging re­la­tion­ships.

That’s a big prob­lem for a White House that is try­ing to con­vince Demo­crat­ic law­makers that Obama’s pres­id­ency de­pends on their sup­port for air strikes.

“It’s un­for­tu­nate be­cause I want to see my pres­id­ent suc­ceed. But I took an oath to up­hold the Con­sti­tu­tion, not the pres­id­ent,” Rep. Alan Grayson, D-Fla., who has been whip­ping his col­leagues against in­ter­ven­tion, said in an in­ter­view in his of­fice after he ral­lied the faith­ful at the Code Pink vi­gil. “The pres­id­ent is ask­ing mem­bers of Con­gress to choose between him and their con­stitu­ents. For most mem­bers, that’s an easy choice.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×