Australian Election Seen Likely to Speed Talks with India on Uranium Deal

None

Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
See more stories about...
Rachel Oswald, Global Security Newswire
Sept. 11, 2013, 10:02 a.m.

WASH­ING­TON — Newly elec­ted lead­ers in Aus­tralia likely will push to con­clude a trade agree­ment aimed at al­low­ing urani­um ex­ports to In­dia, is­sue ex­perts told Glob­al Se­cur­ity News­wire.

While it was earli­er pre­dicted to take two years to con­clude the ex­port ne­go­ti­ations, a new Lib­er­al-Na­tion­al gov­ern­ment led by con­ser­vat­ive lead­er Tony Ab­bott likely will push to have trade dis­cus­sions fin­ished “with­in the year,” ac­cord­ing to Amit­abh Mat­too, dir­ect­or of the Aus­tralia In­dia In­sti­tute at the Uni­versity of Mel­bourne.

“The Tony Ab­bott gov­ern­ment will un­doubtedly give a new [push] to ties with In­dia,” Mat­too wrote in an e-mail. “There are few coun­tries in the re­gion which have more in com­mon by way of both in­terests and val­ues than In­dia and Aus­tralia, and the Lib­er­als re­cog­nize this much, much more than Labor did.”

Still, that does not mean Aus­tralia will ease off its de­mands for strong safe­guards in any trade deal that guar­an­tees its urani­um will not be di­ver­ted to In­dia’s nuc­le­ar-weapons pro­gram, ac­cord­ing to spe­cial­ists.

“Both Mr. Ab­bott’s Lib­er­al Party and the Labor Party now in op­pos­i­tion have in the past been care­ful to avoid ap­pear­ing soft on nuc­le­ar safe­guards, giv­en strongly neg­at­ive pub­lic per­cep­tions of nuc­le­ar power and weapons in Aus­tralia,” Chris­toph­er Krem­mer, a fel­low at the Aus­tralia In­dia In­sti­tute, said in an e-mail.

A strong show­ing by the Aus­trali­an Lib­er­al-Na­tion­al Party co­ali­tion in Sat­urday elec­tions un­seated the Labor gov­ern­ment, which has held power since 2007. The Labor Party was voted out of of­fice, in part, due to voter per­cep­tions that it was mis­man­aging the growth of Aus­tralia’s min­ing sec­tor, which in­cludes the world’s largest known urani­um re­serves, ac­cord­ing to Re­u­ters.

Rory Med­calf, dir­ect­or of the Lowy In­sti­tute’s In­ter­na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Pro­gram in Aus­tralia, told GSN in an e-mail he ex­pects the Lib­er­al-Na­tion­al co­ali­tion will place a high­er pri­or­ity on “the steady ex­pan­sion of Aus­trali­an urani­um ex­ports for ci­vil­ian pur­poses and un­der safe­guards.”

“Labor, on the oth­er hand, has al­ways been in­tern­ally di­vided on this is­sue,” he said.

In 2011, the Labor Party — un­der the ur­ging of its then-lead­er and prime min­is­ter, Ju­lia Gil­lard — over­came sub­stan­tial in­tern­al dis­agree­ment and ap­proved a policy per­mit­ting the sale of urani­um to In­dia. Op­pon­ents to the move ar­gued it could un­der­mine arms-con­trol ef­forts as In­dia de­veloped and tested nuc­le­ar weapons out­side the bounds of the Nuc­le­ar Non­pro­lif­er­a­tion Treaty.

As pun­ish­ment for its ac­quis­i­tion of nuc­le­ar arms, New Del­hi for years was black­balled by the atom­ic-ex­ports mar­ket. Then, in 2008, the United States con­vinced the in­ter­na­tion­al Nuc­le­ar Sup­pli­ers Group to al­low sales to In­dia par­tially on the grounds that it had been a good stew­ard of its nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al. A num­ber of na­tions with ad­vanced nuc­le­ar-en­ergy sec­tors, in­clud­ing Rus­sia and France, have since struck bi­lat­er­al atom­ic trade deals with In­dia.

Aus­tralia to date has sold urani­um only to NPT mem­ber states. Un­der the Labor gov­ern­ment, Can­berra had moved slowly in open­ing urani­um trade talks with New Del­hi. The first round of trade talks was held in March.

Can­berra likely will con­tin­ue to in­sist that New Del­hi agree to provide it with form­al as­sur­ances that urani­um ex­ports will not be used to pro­duce weapon-grade nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al, ex­perts said.

“There is no ques­tion … of Aus­tralia al­low­ing its urani­um to be di­ver­ted to non-safe­guarded fa­cil­it­ies, nor has In­dia pur­sued this pos­sib­il­ity in its ne­go­ti­ations,” Mat­too said.

The Lib­er­al-Na­tion­al con­ser­vat­ive co­ali­tion in Aus­tralia “con­sist­ently” has favored urani­um ex­ports to In­dia ever since former Prime Min­is­ter John Howard changed policy in that dir­ec­tion in 2007, ac­cord­ing to Med­calf.

“But at no point have they in­dic­ated they would ac­cept any­thing be­low Aus­tralia’s stand­ard of safe­guards as re­quired of oth­er nuc­le­ar-armed re­cip­i­ent na­tions, such as China and Rus­sia,” he ad­ded.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×