Gun Control Failed in Congress. It’s Happening Anyway.

Between Newtown and the Navy Yard, President Obama launched 25 separate initiatives — and there’s little the NRA can do to stop them.

President Obama addressed the Navy Yard shooting before a speech on Monday from the White House.
National Journal
Patrick Reis and Matt Vasilogambros
Sept. 17, 2013, 11:44 a.m.

Gun-con­trol le­gis­la­tion failed loudly fol­low­ing the New­town school shoot­ing, but that has not stopped Pres­id­ent Obama from leav­ing Con­gress be­hind to launch a broad gun-con­trol cam­paign of his own.

Between the Decem­ber 2012 mas­sacre and the Navy Yard mass shoot­ing Monday, Obama has taken 25 sep­ar­ate gun-con­trol ini­ti­at­ives, all of which came from ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions that did not re­quire con­gres­sion­al au­thor­iz­a­tion.

The pres­id­ent’s highest-pro­file move was to nom­in­ate and get con­firmed Todd Jones as dir­ect­or of the Bur­eau of Al­co­hol, To­bacco, Fire­arms, and Ex­plos­ives, filling a seat that had sat empty for more than six years. But Obama has also ini­ti­ated a series of quieter ini­ti­at­ives, in­clud­ing new rules to keep guns away from felons, bet­ter co­ordin­ate men­tal-ill­ness screen­ings, and bet­ter pre­par­ing loc­al law en­force­ment and schools to re­spond to shoot­ings.

The White House read­ily ad­mits its ac­tions alone can­not solve the na­tion’s epi­dem­ic of gun vi­ol­ence, but giv­en that an ex­pan­ded-back­ground-check bill stalled in the Sen­ate in April, the ex­ec­ut­ive or­ders are — for now — Obama’s only avail­able op­tion.

“Even without Con­gress, my ad­min­is­tra­tion will keep do­ing everything it can to pro­tect more of our com­munit­ies,” a vis­ibly angry Obama said after the bill fell six votes shy of the 60 needed to break a fili­buster.

For Obama, the ac­tions’ main ad­vant­age is that they can­not be blocked by the power­ful gun lobby — in­clud­ing the Na­tion­al Rifle As­so­ci­ation — that suc­cess­fully sty­mied the pres­id­ent’s le­gis­lat­ive push. Down the line, the rules could be changed by a sub­sequent ad­min­is­tra­tion, or Con­gress could hamper their ef­fic­acy by at some point cut­ting the fund­ing to en­force them. But, for now at least, Obama can move for­ward without wait­ing for any­one else’s per­mis­sion.

Most of Obama’s or­ders are aimed at re­du­cing ad­min­is­trat­ive weak­nesses that com­plic­ate the en­force­ment of ex­ist­ing gun laws, said John Hudak, a fel­low in gov­ernance stud­ies at the Brook­ings In­sti­tu­tion.

It will be years, however, be­fore any­one knows wheth­er these policies have any meas­ur­able ef­fect in re­du­cing gun vi­ol­ence, Hudak said. “Be­cause these policies were either launched in Janu­ary or the con­ver­sa­tion about them was launched in Janu­ary, we cer­tainly don’t have any evid­ence about their ef­fect­ive­ness one way or an­oth­er,” he said.

And re­gard­less of suc­cess­ful they are, the power of these ini­ti­at­ives to curb gun vi­ol­ence pales in com­par­is­on to what con­gres­sion­al ac­tion could ac­com­plish, Hudak said. “These are piece­meal changes, some of them are ce­re­mo­ni­al. There’s only so much he can do without Con­gress. The pres­id­ent’s hands are quite tied.”

And so, even as Obama has pur­sued his own re­forms, his ad­min­is­tra­tion has con­tinu­ally de­man­ded ac­tion from Con­gress. That con­tin­ued Tues­day, when — in his com­ments on the Navy Yard mass murder in Wash­ing­ton — White House press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney lashed out at Re­pub­lic­ans for block­ing the back­ground check bill in April.

“The prob­lem here is not Demo­crats,” Car­ney said, when pressed by re­port­ers on the num­ber of mass shoot­ings in Obama’s pres­id­ency. “The prob­lem here is sen­at­ors, over­whelm­ingly from one party, who re­fuse to do something very simple, which is ex­pand the back­ground-check sys­tem that every­one be­lieves func­tions well but needs to func­tion bet­ter. It’s their choice.”

Five Demo­crats voted against the bill in April, al­though one of those was Ma­jor­ity Lead­er Harry Re­id, who sup­por­ted the meas­ure but voted against it for pro­ced­ur­al reas­ons that would al­low him to bring it to the Sen­ate floor again.

Four Re­pub­lic­ans voted for the meas­ure, while 42 voted against it.

Felons, Gun Im­ports, and Men­tal Health


Of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s 25 ac­tions, two were launched in Au­gust, in­clud­ing one that closes a loop­hole that doesn’t re­quire back­ground checks for weapons re­gistered un­der a trust or cor­por­a­tion. There­fore, the ad­min­is­tra­tion ar­gues, felons, or do­mest­ic ab­users can eas­ily gain ac­cess to these weapons. In the last year, the ATF has re­ceived more than 39,000 of these re­quests, and though many of those were likely for le­git­im­ate cor­por­a­tions, the loop­hole provides felons a win­dow for ob­tain­ing fire­arms they wouldn’t have oth­er­wise, Hudak said. The White House is cur­rently work­ing on a pro­posed ver­sion of the new rules, which would then be sub­ject to pub­lic com­ment and re­sub­mit­ted as a fi­nal rule.

The White House has also put in place a policy to deny re­quests to bring Amer­ic­an mil­it­ary-grade fire­arms to the U.S. from oth­er coun­tries, with the ex­cep­tion of mu­seums. Since 2005, the United States has au­thor­ized more than 250,000 of these weapons to come in­to the coun­try. This new policy, which the ad­min­is­tra­tion says will help keep these guns off the streets, has been im­ple­men­ted. Both of these ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions were an­nounced in Au­gust.

In total, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has moved on or fin­ished 24 of the 25 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions. The only one that is pending is a rule that would make group health care plans of­fer men­tal-health be­ne­fits at par­ity with oth­er med­ic­al and sur­gic­al be­ne­fits. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is ex­pec­ted to fi­nal­ize this rule later this year.

Here are the ori­gin­al 23 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions:

Ex­ec­ut­ive Ac­tions on Gun Vi­ol­ence

Felons, Gun Imports, and Mental Health


Of the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s 25 ac­tions, two were launched in Au­gust, in­clud­ing one that closes a loop­hole that doesn’t re­quire back­ground checks for weapons re­gistered un­der a trust or cor­por­a­tion. There­fore, the ad­min­is­tra­tion ar­gues, felons, or do­mest­ic ab­users can eas­ily gain ac­cess to these weapons. In the last year, the ATF has re­ceived more than 39,000 of these re­quests, and though many of those were likely for le­git­im­ate cor­por­a­tions, the loop­hole provides felons a win­dow for ob­tain­ing fire­arms they wouldn’t have oth­er­wise, Hudak said. The White House is cur­rently work­ing on a pro­posed ver­sion of the new rules, which would then be sub­ject to pub­lic com­ment and re­sub­mit­ted as a fi­nal rule.

The White House has also put in place a policy to deny re­quests to bring Amer­ic­an mil­it­ary-grade fire­arms to the U.S. from oth­er coun­tries, with the ex­cep­tion of mu­seums. Since 2005, the United States has au­thor­ized more than 250,000 of these weapons to come in­to the coun­try. This new policy, which the ad­min­is­tra­tion says will help keep these guns off the streets, has been im­ple­men­ted. Both of these ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions were an­nounced in Au­gust.

In total, the ad­min­is­tra­tion has moved on or fin­ished 24 of the 25 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions. The only one that is pending is a rule that would make group health care plans of­fer men­tal-health be­ne­fits at par­ity with oth­er med­ic­al and sur­gic­al be­ne­fits. The ad­min­is­tra­tion is ex­pec­ted to fi­nal­ize this rule later this year.

Here are the ori­gin­al 23 ex­ec­ut­ive ac­tions:

Ex­ec­ut­ive Ac­tions on Gun Vi­ol­ence

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×