Unfortunately, We Won’t Be Seeing a Putin-McCain Debate

The Arizona senator’s op-ed is up at <em>Pravda</em>. But the Russian president’s press secretary says not to expect much more than that.

Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks during his visit to the new headquarters of "Russia Today" TV channel in Moscow, Russia, Tuesday, June 11, 2013. 
AP
Matt Berman
See more stories about...
Matt Berman
Sept. 19, 2013, 5:30 a.m.

The mo­ment you were maybe wait­ing for has ar­rived: Sen. John Mc­Cain, R-Ar­iz., is of­fi­cially a pub­lished colum­nist in Rus­sia’s Pravda (but not the Pravda you’re think­ing of, see up­date be­low). The opin­ion piece is head­lined “Sen­at­or John Mc­Cain: Rus­si­ans de­serve bet­ter than Putin.” But un­for­tu­nately, Putin’s press sec­ret­ary thinks we all de­serve bet­ter than see­ing the two square-off.

In the op-ed, Mc­Cain pushes aside the idea that he is some­how anti-Rus­si­an. “I am pro-Rus­si­an,” he writes, “more pro-Rus­si­an than the re­gime that mis­rules you today.” He con­tin­ues:

Pres­id­ent Putin and his as­so­ci­ates … don’t re­spect your dig­nity or ac­cept your au­thor­ity over them. They pun­ish dis­sent and im­pris­on op­pon­ents. They rig your elec­tions. They con­trol your me­dia. They har­ass, threaten, and ban­ish or­gan­iz­a­tions that de­fend your right to self-gov­ernance. To per­petu­ate their power they foster rampant cor­rup­tion in your courts and your eco­nomy and ter­ror­ize and even as­sas­sin­ate journ­al­ists who try to ex­pose their cor­rup­tion.

In his con­clu­sion, Mc­Cain writes that he longs for the day when Rus­si­ans have a gov­ern­ment that an­swers to them. The column is worth read­ing, if only for the pure oddity of how it came about and how Mc­Cain tries to ad­dress the Rus­si­an people. 

And yes, Vladi­mir Putin will be read­ing the op-ed.

At least that’s ac­cord­ing to his press sec­ret­ary, Dmitry Peskov, quoted by Rus­sia’s IT­AR-TASS. “We will def­in­itely read it,” he said, but “en­ga­ging him in de­bate is un­likely — it’s the point of view of someone liv­ing across the ocean.”

Peskov also quibbled with what Mc­Cain ac­tu­ally wrote:

As far as what Rus­si­ans de­serve ““ they’re cap­able of an­swer­ing this ques­tion them­selves and they do an­swer it dur­ing elec­tions. I don’t think that point of view of someone across the ocean plays any sort of role in how Rus­si­ans ex­press their will.

Ap­par­ently, be­ing on the oth­er side of the ocean means that you can’t help guide the policies of an­oth­er coun­try. Per­haps this mes­sage should be trans­mit­ted to Putin.

UP­DATE (9:40 a.m.): CNN re­ports that the Mc­Cain op-ed saga may be even stranger than we thought. Ac­cord­ing to CNN, the Pravda that pub­lished Mc­Cain’s op-ed is just a Rus­si­an web­site, and not ac­tu­ally the Pravda news­pa­per that’s been around since 1912. The two or­gan­iz­a­tions have no con­nec­tion, and just hap­pen to share a name.

Sen. Mc­Cain’s of­fice sent a draft of his op-ed to both the news­pa­per and the un­affli­ated web­site. The news­pa­per didn’t ac­tu­ally pub­lish the piece.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
&#8216;PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER&#8217;
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×