Nunes Vents About Lack of GOP Strategy on Shutdown

Some House Republican colleagues, or “lemmings with suicide vests,” seem lost in the search for a fix.

Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., at right.
National Journal
Stacy Kaper
Oct. 1, 2013, 1:43 p.m.

Phones in the of­fice of Rep. Dev­in Nunes, R-Cal­if., were ringing in­cess­antly Tues­day with weary staffers po­litely field­ing callers com­plain­ing about the gov­ern­ment shut­down, Obama­care, and a wide range of oth­er frus­tra­tions with Wash­ing­ton.

The Cali­for­nia Re­pub­lic­an made head­lines Monday for call­ing some of his Re­pub­lic­an col­leagues “lem­mings with sui­cide vests” for be­ing will­ing to shut down the gov­ern­ment over Obama­care, as re­por­ted by The Wash­ing­ton Post.

By Tues­day, Nunes made plain he was ex­as­per­ated with the situ­ation.

“It’s fun,” he said, quickly cla­ri­fy­ing, “I’m be­ing a little sar­cast­ic.”

“There’s just a lot of con­fu­sion out there,” he said of the pub­lic re­sponse. “The Re­pub­lic­an base is all for this — all for get­ting rid of Obam­care — but it’s prob­lem­at­ic be­cause there aren’t the votes to do it, so there is a little mis­un­der­stand­ing.”

“Then we’ll ob­vi­ously start hear­ing from some con­stitu­ents who need help from the fed­er­al gov­ern­ment, wheth­er it be pass­ports or get to the na­tion­al parks or what have you.”

Staffers in Nunes’s of­fice were over­heard ex­plain­ing to callers that he has re­peatedly voted against Obama­care, but that he wanted to avoid a gov­ern­ment shut­down.

“I was nev­er a big fan of this strategy,” he said. “Now we are in full im­ple­ment­a­tion of the Cruz strategy, so now I guess you have got to see it play out. How it ends — you got me.”

Nunes said he doesn’t think the con­ser­vat­ives who sup­port the ap­proach ad­voc­ated by Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, ever thought it through.

“I don’t know if they ever knew how it is sup­posed to end,” he said. “I don’t think they ever thought that through all the way…. If you are go­ing to take a host­age and shut down the gov­ern­ment, you damn sure bet­ter have an en­dgame and this didn’t have that.”

Nunes said he re­mains con­cerned that the far-right fac­tion could pre­vail in fight­ing the debt ceil­ing, which is around the corner and could have neg­at­ive eco­nom­ic rami­fic­a­tions.

“You have a few folks on our side that are will­ing to do that, and you have a White House and many Demo­crats, who are root­ing for that, be­cause I think they’d love to turn around and blame Re­pub­lic­ans for the eco­nom­ic prob­lems,” he said. “It’s a dan­ger­ous con­coc­tion when you have few people here in the House who are able to wag the tail of the dog and at the same time have the lead­er­ship of this coun­try — the folks who have been elec­ted to lead in the White House — who be­hind the scenes are secretly root­ing for it.”

He em­phas­ized frus­tra­tion that the up­set in the Re­pub­lic­an Party plays to the hand of Demo­crats. “I’m not go­ing to name names, but a lot of my Demo­crat­ic friends, be­hind closed doors laugh; they are pro­mot­ing it, egging us on. We prob­ably all need a little time-out, but it is prob­ably not go­ing to hap­pen.”

Nunes said he has dubbed some of the tea-party-in­spired flank of the GOP con­fer­ence the “lem­ming caucus” be­cause they are so fo­cused on mak­ing a point that they are harm­ing the party.

“There are a few folks around here who should be run­ning for lead­er­ship when you have a lead­er­ship po­s­i­tion open…. The last two Con­gresses, they didn’t run, and then, this last gam­bit — they cre­ated this spec­tacle on the floor that was totally un­ac­cept­able,” he said.

Nunes said that dy­nam­ic is play­ing out.

“For three years straight, they don’t sup­port any­thing that the lead­er­ship does, and at the same time they don’t run for lead­er­ship. That is not lead­er­ship. Those are what I call lem­mings,” he said.

“They sneak around. They don’t pub­licly do much. They don’t run for of­fice. They sneak around, and they plot and they plan on ways to take down rules and everything that a ma­jor­ity should not be do­ing,” he said.

Nunes’s frus­tra­tion amounts to open dis­gust. “They are op­er­at­ing like a par­lia­ment­ary sys­tem, not a demo­crat­ic re­pub­lic, and if you don’t have 218 votes you don’t have any­thing. For the last three years we have had a tough time get­ting 218 votes, and they are be­ing egged on by Demo­crats, and they don’t get it. So that is why I call them lem­mings, the lem­ming caucus.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×