House Republicans Expect to Approve Short-Term Debt Deal

Conservatives appear ready to accept a debt deal as a first step to getting Democrats to move on long-term fiscal issues.

WASHINGTON, DC - AUGUST 01: House Ways and Means Committee members U.S. Rep. Paul Ryan (R-WI) (R) and U.S. Rep. Tom Price (R-GA) visit before a committee hearing in the Longworth House Office Building on Capitol Hill August 1, 2013 in Washington, DC. During a hearing titled, 'The Status of the Affordable Care Act Implementation,' the committee questioned representatives from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Internal Revenue Service responsible for implimenting the ACA. 
National Journal
Tim Alberta
Oct. 9, 2013, 1:14 p.m.

House Re­pub­lic­ans re­main com­mit­ted to for­cing ne­go­ti­ations with Pres­id­ent Obama and Sen­ate Demo­crats over a range of long-term fisc­al is­sues, in­clud­ing the debt-ceil­ing and budget de­fi­cit. But they also are be­gin­ning to ac­cept that for such talks to take place, they must first ap­prove a short-term debt lim­it in­crease.

On Wed­nes­day, Re­pub­lic­ans soun­ded pre­pared to do pre­cisely that.

In in­ter­views with nu­mer­ous GOP law­makers, mem­bers spoke with con­fid­ence ““ and ac­cept­ance ““ of the fact that the House will soon ap­prove a short-term deal to raise the debt-ceil­ing and force Demo­crats to the ne­go­ti­at­ing table.

De­tails are still be­ing ironed out, House Re­pub­lic­ans said, but they are on track to ap­prove a debt-lim­it ex­ten­sion — last­ing between four and six weeks — that would es­tab­lish a frame­work for sub­sequent fisc­al ne­go­ti­ations. Law­makers said this short-term deal, which Pres­id­ent Obama has prom­ised would com­pel him to join com­pre­hens­ive talks over long-term fisc­al is­sues, could pass as soon as Fri­day.

“We aren’t go­ing to solve the long-term chal­lenges in a week,” said Rep. Tom Price of Geor­gia. “So if there’s a solu­tion to this … it’s a ne­go­ti­ated agree­ment to have a short-term debt-lim­it ex­ten­sion that gives the time to be able to solve the long-term chal­lenges.”

The par­tic­u­lars of this short-term pro­pos­al are in flux, as there are on­go­ing dis­cus­sions with­in the con­fer­ence re­gard­ing which pro­vi­sions — if any — should be at­tached. Some mem­bers are push­ing for com­men­sur­ate spend­ing cuts, though such a fig­ure could be dif­fi­cult to cal­cu­late. Oth­ers are ad­voc­at­ing the in­clu­sion of one, or mul­tiple, mini-fund­ing bills that have been passed through the House. A clutch of con­ser­vat­ives, mean­while, are ask­ing for lan­guage that would pri­or­it­ize Treas­ury pay­ments.

“We’d prefer a long-term deal,” said Rep. Steve Scal­ise, chair­man of the Re­pub­lic­an Study Com­mit­tee. “But if we need to do something short-term, we should have the cor­res­pond­ing re­forms.”

Still, with the debt-ceil­ing dead­line loom­ing next week, and mar­kets war­ily watch­ing Con­gress’s every move, some GOP law­makers are against at­tach­ing any­thing “ob­jec­tion­able” for fear the Sen­ate would re­ject it. In fact, some con­ser­vat­ives are quietly whip­ping sup­port for something be­ing called the “four-plus-four” plan, which would sim­ul­tan­eously pass “clean” four-week ver­sions of a con­tinu­ing res­ol­u­tion and debt-lim­it in­crease. The pro­pos­al, which would es­tab­lish bind­ing guidelines for talks between House Re­pub­lic­ans and the White House and Sen­ate Demo­crats, is in­triguing to some Re­pub­lic­an law­makers.

“If it was a month-long, and it held the pres­id­ent’s feet to the fire to ne­go­ti­ate, I think that’s something people would be will­ing to take a look at,” said Rep. Matt Sal­mon of Ari­zona.

But this pro­pos­al — which is also at­tract­ive to some mem­bers be­cause it would also re­open the gov­ern­ment — stands little chance of gain­ing ma­jor­ity sup­port among Re­pub­lic­ans, many of whom re­fuse to pass any clean debt-ceil­ing in­crease be­cause of the pre­ced­ent it would set. Sev­er­al con­ser­vat­ive mem­bers, speak­ing on con­di­tion of an­onym­ity so as not to of­fend their col­leagues, flat-out dis­missed the idea.

“That’s nev­er gonna hap­pen,” said one GOP law­maker.

Speak­er John Boehner and his lead­er­ship team have been meet­ing this week with rank-and-file mem­bers to build con­sensus and keep every­one on the same page. One of those mem­bers, speak­ing on con­di­tion of an­onym­ity to talk can­didly about the strategy of the con­fer­ence, said the short-term ex­ten­sion has emerged as the “clear front-run­ner” and said he’s hop­ing for a vote by week’s end.

The hang-up, he said, is de­cid­ing ex­actly how long the ex­ten­sion should last ““ and which pro­vi­sions could be in­cluded without start­ing an­oth­er ping-pong match with the Sen­ate.

Seni­or Re­pub­lic­an aides cau­tioned that noth­ing has been settled ahead of GOP lead­er­ship’s vis­it to the White House on Thursday. But with the Oct. 17 dead­line draw­ing close, and Obama already rul­ing out ne­go­ti­ations with Re­pub­lic­ans pri­or to the pas­sage of a debt-lim­it ex­ten­sion, some kind of short-term deal ap­pears to be a fore­gone con­clu­sion ““ even if the de­tails are far from fi­nal­ized.

If Obama won’t ne­go­ti­ate un­til after the debt-ceil­ing is raised, “then it’s our re­spons­ib­il­ity to make sure that we don’t de­fault,” said Rep. Tim Wal­berg of Michigan. “And I think we’re up to that.”

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×