Search for Syrian Chemical Host Prompts Muted Global Response

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 11, 2013, 11:02 a.m.

The United States re­cently cour­ted coun­tries across Europe and the Middle East to po­ten­tially host Syr­i­an chem­ic­al-war­fare ma­ter­i­als or their rem­nants, but no na­tion made an im­me­di­ate, pub­lic leap for the op­por­tun­ity, For­eign Policy magazine re­por­ted on Thursday.

At least one plan calls for all but the dead­li­est ma­ter­i­als in the Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment’s chem­ic­al ar­sen­al to be elim­in­ated out­side the na­tion’s bor­ders. However, loc­a­tions for the planned de­struc­tion ef­fort re­mained un­clear, as did the ul­ti­mate des­tin­a­tions of its by-products.

A largely U.S.-led search for de­struc­tion as­sist­ance in­cluded con­tacts with Al­bania, Bel­gi­um, France and Rus­sia, which all have his­tor­ic­al ex­per­i­ence in des­troy­ing chem­ic­al-weapon stocks. U.S. of­fi­cials also reached out to Nor­way, which has no his­tory in deal­ing with such sub­stances.

One chem­ic­al-weapon ex­pert said he was “sur­prised” by the lat­ter in­quiry.

“The best op­tion is to des­troy the chem­ic­als and the pre­curs­ors on-site in Syr­ia. That would seem bet­ter than ap­proach­ing a coun­try like Nor­way,” said Paul Walk­er, in­ter­na­tion­al pro­gram dir­ect­or of the en­vir­on­ment­al se­cur­ity and sus­tain­ab­il­ity pro­gram of Green Cross and Glob­al Green.

The Syr­i­an gov­ern­ment ad­mit­ted pos­sess­ing chem­ic­al weapons and agreed to their de­struc­tion about a month ago, after an Au­gust nerve-gas at­tack promp­ted an im­me­di­ate threat of U.S. mil­it­ary in­ter­ven­tion in the coun­try’s civil war. The agree­ment kicked off a whirl­wind dis­arm­a­ment ef­fort res­ult­ing in Fri­day’s No­bel Peace Prize award to the in­ter­na­tion­al agency charged with count­ing and over­see­ing elim­in­a­tion of the Syr­i­an stocks.

An eight-month push to cor­ral and des­troy the arms will in­volve “ex­ceed­ingly com­plex se­cur­ity chal­lenges re­lated to en­sur­ing a safe op­er­at­ing en­vir­on­ment at de­struc­tion sites,” U.N. Sec­ret­ary Ban Ki-moon said in a Monday plan­ning doc­u­ment. The U.N. Se­cur­ity Coun­cil later signed off on the U.N. chief’s pro­pos­al, the As­so­ci­ated Press re­por­ted on Fri­day.

What equip­ment would des­troy the ma­ter­i­als also re­mains un­cer­tain. The U.S. De­fense De­part­ment on Tues­day de­scribed a re­cently de­veloped, port­able dis­pos­al sys­tem to the Or­gan­iz­a­tion for the Pro­hib­i­tion of Chem­ic­al Weapons, which has un­til Nov. 15 to settle on spe­cif­ic gear, Re­u­ters re­por­ted.

“This is very big busi­ness, very polit­ic­al, and sev­er­al gov­ern­ments are push­ing for it,” said Di­eter Roth­bach­er, a former OP­CW per­son­nel train­er.

A spasm of Thursday vi­ol­ence near a re­por­ted chem­ic­al-arms site un­der­scored se­cur­ity risks to the in­ter­na­tion­al dis­arm­a­ment ef­fort, the Wall Street Journ­al re­por­ted.

Back­ers of the Syr­i­an res­ist­ance said the stepped-up fight­ing took place near the Safira De­fense Factor­ies and Sci­entif­ic Re­search Fa­cil­it­ies. A num­ber of spe­cial­ists said the Safira in­stall­a­tion — a re­por­ted labor­at­ory and man­u­fac­tur­ing site — is among the coun­try’s most siz­able and cut­ting-edge.

Mo­scow, an ally of Syr­i­an Pres­id­ent Bashar As­sad, re­af­firmed its con­ten­tion that the op­pos­i­tion is en­gaged in chem­ic­al-war­fare activ­it­ies, state-run Rus­sia Today re­por­ted on Fri­day.

“Some re­ports in­dic­ate that [the] al-Nusra Front is plan­ning to smuggle tox­ic com­pounds and rel­ev­ant spe­cial­ists in­to Ir­aqi ter­rit­ory to stage ter­ror­ist at­tacks there this time,” Rus­si­an For­eign Min­is­ter Sergei Lav­rov said.

Lav­rov ad­ded that op­er­at­ives from out­side gov­ern­ments might have giv­en re­lated train­ing to Syr­i­an op­pos­i­tion fight­ers in tri­bal ter­rit­or­ies of Afgh­anistan. The Rus­si­an me­dia re­port did not identi­fy what coun­tries could have con­trib­uted.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
1 days ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×