South Korea: North Able to Conduct Nuclear Test Any Time

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 16, 2013, 6:02 a.m.

North Korea has the ca­pa­city to carry out a fourth nuc­le­ar weapons test whenev­er it chooses to do so, South Korea’s seni­or ne­go­ti­at­or for stalled de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion ne­go­ti­ations with Py­ongy­ang said on Tues­day.

Nuc­le­ar en­voy Cho Tae-yong told an audi­ence in Seoul “the as­sess­ment of North Korea’s nuc­le­ar cap­ab­il­it­ies is very grave, and we see it has the abil­ity to carry out an­oth­er round of nuc­le­ar tests whenev­er it wants in tech­no­lo­gic­al terms,” the Yon­hap News Agency re­por­ted.

Py­ongy­ang car­ried out its third and most-power­ful test to date in Feb­ru­ary. Ex­perts be­lieve at least one more un­der­ground ex­plo­sion is ne­ces­sary for the North to fig­ure out how to mini­atur­ize nuc­le­ar weapons for load­ing onto mis­siles.

“There are signs that the five-mega­watt graph­ite mod­er­ated re­act­or has been in op­er­a­tion re­cently, the North is ex­pand­ing nuc­le­ar en­rich­ment fa­cil­it­ies, and con­struc­tion is un­der­way for a small-scale light-wa­ter re­act­or,” Cho said in tick­ing off the vari­ous areas where Py­ongy­ang is ad­van­cing its abil­ity to pro­duce fis­sile ma­ter­i­al for war­heads.

The head of the U.N. nuc­le­ar watch­dog agency in an in­ter­view with Yon­hap said an­oth­er nuc­le­ar test by the North “or threat of an­oth­er test, is very dis­turb­ing.”

In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency Dir­ect­or Gen­er­al Yukiya Amano said: “We are al­ways pre­pared to go back to North Korea when re­ques­ted. But in or­der that the IAEA goes back to the North, a polit­ic­al agree­ment is es­sen­tial.”

Py­ongy­ang has said it is will­ing to re­turn to re­gion­al aid-for-de­nuc­lear­iz­a­tion ne­go­ti­ations but only on an un­con­di­tion­al basis. It has also tried to get its erstwhile ne­go­ti­at­ing part­ner to ta­citly re­cog­nize it as a nuc­le­ar-armed na­tion.

“In the past, the North con­sidered the pos­sib­il­ity of giv­ing up nuc­le­ar weapons in ex­change for as­sist­ance,” Chinese Cent­ral Party School ana­lyst Zhang Li­an­gui said in an in­ter­view with the Glob­al Times news­pa­per. “But now it wants to turn back to the ne­go­ti­ation table as a nuc­le­ar state and act as a su­per­visor of oth­er nuc­le­ar states, im­ply­ing that if it were to give up nuc­le­ar weapons, it would want oth­ers to do the same first.”

Zhang said oth­er par­ti­cipants in the moribund six-na­tion ne­go­ti­ations — China, Ja­pan, South Korea, Rus­sia and the United States — “should also break the North’s il­lu­sion that one day they will ad­mit its status as a nuc­le­ar state,” Yon­hap re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×