Obama Says He is Confident About Pakistani Nuclear Security

None

Global Security Newswire Staff
See more stories about...
Global Security Newswire Staff
Oct. 24, 2013, 9:02 a.m.

Pres­id­ent Obama as­ser­ted he was con­fid­ent Pakistan is com­mit­ted to main­tain­ing se­cur­ity around its nuc­le­ar ar­sen­al on Wed­nes­day, just weeks after it was re­vealed the U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity has made sur­veil­lance of the South Asi­an coun­try’s nuc­le­ar sites one of its top pri­or­it­ies.

In a joint state­ment re­leased fol­low­ing a meet­ing at the White House between Obama and Pakistani Prime Min­is­ter Nawaz Sharif, the U.S. lead­er “re­it­er­ated his con­fid­ence in Pakistan’s com­mit­ment and ded­ic­a­tion to nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity and re­cog­nized that Pakistan is fully en­gaged with the in­ter­na­tion­al com­munity on nuc­le­ar safety and se­cur­ity is­sues.”

The U.S. gov­ern­ment in the past has pub­licly touted Is­lamabad’s com­mit­ment to nuc­le­ar se­cur­ity when new con­cerns were raised that Pakistani-based ex­trem­ists — who have car­ried out at­tacks in re­cent years on large Pakistani mil­it­ary bases — might be able to pen­et­rate one of the coun­try’s fa­cil­it­ies where nuc­le­ar weapons or ma­ter­i­als are held. The valid­ity of those pub­lic as­sur­ances took a hit in Septem­ber when it was re­vealed — through doc­u­ments leaked by former NSA con­tract­or Ed­ward Snowden — that keep­ing tabs on the se­cur­ity of Pakistan’s nuc­le­ar, chem­ic­al and bio­lo­gic­al fa­cil­it­ies was con­sum­ing a grow­ing share of U.S. in­tel­li­gence agen­cies’ black budget.

An ana­lys­is of the doc­u­ments leaked by Snowden to the Wash­ing­ton Post shows the U.S. gov­ern­ment is con­cerned about the lack of in­form­a­tion it has on how ex­actly nuc­le­ar ma­ter­i­al is spread out around Pakistan’s fa­cil­it­ies.

The con­cerns of the U.S. in­tel­li­gence com­munity were not in evid­ence in the pub­lic state­ment re­leased on Wed­nes­day. Rather, Obama noted his ap­pre­ci­ation with “Pakistan’s con­struct­ive en­gage­ment with the Nuc­le­ar Se­cur­ity Sum­mit Pro­cess and its co­oper­a­tion with the In­ter­na­tion­al Atom­ic En­ergy Agency and oth­er in­ter­na­tion­al for­ums” and ac­know­ledged “Pakistan’s ef­forts to im­prove its stra­tegic trade con­trols.”

The state­ment did not touch on con­cerns by the U.S. gov­ern­ment that Pakistan’s re­cent fo­cus on de­vel­op­ing com­pact lower-yield nuc­le­ar weapons might make it easi­er for ex­trem­ists groups to steal off with an en­tire war­head, the New York Times re­por­ted.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×