White House Making Life Miserable for Democratic Lawmakers, Reformers

If you support Obamacare, you can’t be happy with President Obama’s team.

President Barack Obama speaks at Temple Emanu-El November 6, 2013 in Dallas, Texas.
National Journal
Ron Fournier
Nov. 7, 2013, 4:01 a.m.

Rather than im­ple­ment­ing the Af­ford­able Care Act, a law with the noble goal of help­ing mil­lions of un­in­sured Amer­ic­ans se­cure health in­sur­ance, the White House is dis­sem­bling. Rather than gov­ern­ing, Pres­id­ent Obama is cam­paign­ing. Every day, it gets worse. The latest:

On Wed­nes­day, seni­or White House ad­viser Dan Pfeif­fer tweeted his take on the Vir­gin­ia gubernat­ori­al elec­tion nar­rowly won by Demo­crat Terry McAul­iffe over right-wing light­weight Ken Cuc­cinelli: “Cuc­cinelli’s pro­file was based on de­feat­ing [Obama­care]; if he couldn’t get big bounce out of re­cent troubles; hard to see GOP strategy work­ing in 14.”

Set­ting aside the fac­tu­al weak­nesses of his ar­gu­ment, I replied to Pfeif­fer: “True only if White House man­ages to im­ple­ment #ACA. Big ‘if.’ Maybe fo­cus less in spin­ning it?” To which Pfeif­fer re­spon­ded: “I don’t dis­agree, has to be im­ple­men­ted and per­form­ance of web­site is un­ac­cept­able, fix­ing is every­one’s top pri­or­ity.”

The prob­lem is that man­aging polit­ic­al fal­lout, rather than hon­esty and com­pet­ence, seems to be the White House’s pri­or­ity. A lot has been writ­ten about Obama prom­ising that Amer­ic­ans could re­tain their health in­sur­ance if they like it (in­clud­ing here), as well as the pres­id­ent’s at­tempt to re­in­vent his­tory about his broken pledge (here). Caught red-handed, the White House shif­ted to a new tac­tic: blam­ing in­sur­ance com­pan­ies.

“The pro­vi­sion in the law was the mani­fest­a­tion of the as­sur­ance that if you have a plan you want to keep, you can keep it,” White House spokes­man Jay Car­ney said this week. “In­sur­ance com­pan­ies that chose to strip away be­ne­fits from ex­ist­ing plans in the in­ter­im, that can­celed ex­ist­ing plans in the in­ter­im, they took away that grand­fath­er­ing op­por­tun­ity.  And that’s a real­ity.”

Not quite. As The Wash­ing­ton Post‘s Glenn Kessler wrote in his fact-check column, “First of all, the ad­min­is­tra­tion wrote the rules that set the con­di­tions un­der which plans lose their grand­fath­er status. But more im­port­ant, the law has an ef­fect­ive date so far in the past that it vir­tu­ally guar­an­teed that the vast ma­jor­ity of people cur­rently in the in­di­vidu­al mar­ket would end up with a no­tice say­ing they needed to buy in­sur­ance on the Obama­care ex­changes. The ad­min­is­tra­tion’s ef­fort to pin the blame on in­sur­ance com­pan­ies is a clas­sic case of mis­dir­ec­tion.”

Mis­dir­ec­tion—the pres­id­ent and his aides spe­cial­ize in that, and they’re de­ploy­ing the tac­tic against their own team now. Many Demo­crat­ic law­makers are in­ter­pret­ing McAul­iffe’s closer-than-ex­pec­ted vic­tory as a sign that voters might pun­ish them in 2014 for Obama­care. Some ven­ted their con­cerns dir­ectly to Obama on Wed­nes­day, the same day he flew to Dal­las to cam­paign for his health care law. Oth­ers went pub­lic, in­clud­ing Sen. Mark Be­gich of Alaska, who blas­ted the ad­min­is­tra­tion’s “mis­man­age­ment,” and Sens. Mary Landrieu of Louisi­ana, Mark Ud­all of Col­or­ado, and Joe Manchin of West Vir­gin­ia, who pro­posed changes to the law.

Ac­cord­ing to exit polling, 53 per­cent of voters in Vir­gin­ia op­posed the health care law. Of those, 81 per­cent voted for Cuc­cinelli, who made Obama­care a battle cry in the cam­paign’s clos­ing days. Obama’s team dis­missed the con­cerns, point­ing to exit polls show­ing that just 27 per­cent of Vir­gin­ia voters iden­ti­fied health care as the most im­port­ant is­sue in the race and, of those, Cuc­cinelli won 49 per­cent to McAul­iffe’s 45 per­cent. Obama­care “is not as tox­ic as [Re­pub­lic­ans] want people to be­lieve,” said Mo El­leithee, a spokes­man for the Demo­crat­ic Na­tion­al Com­mit­tee.

True, the GOP has an ax to grind—and no off-year elec­tion res­ults can be ex­tra­pol­ated to pre­dict the next cycle’s res­ults. But El­leithee’s quote and Pfeif­fer’s tweet are a re­pu­di­ation of fel­low Demo­crats who have good reas­on to worry about Obama­care. At a time when Obama des­per­ately needs al­lies (his ap­prov­al rat­ings are drop­ping), the White House is in­sult­ing its friends.

They may not be exit-poll ex­perts, but Demo­crat­ic law­makers know the stakes. They know what hap­pens to their party—in 2014 and bey­ond—if re­forms sought for dec­ades get suf­foc­ated by gov­ern­ment in­com­pet­ence. They know what hap­pens to Obama if he keeps squan­der­ing his cred­ib­il­ity. They know what hap­pens to them—in their reelec­tion cam­paigns—if the White House doesn’t shift from spin­ning to fix­ing.

For sup­port­ers of health care re­form (dis­clos­ure: I’m one of them), the trend lines are bad. Every day, it gets worse.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
3 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
3 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
2 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×