The NSA Meeting Everyone Wants to Attend But Nobody Will Talk About

The first rule of NSA reform meetings at the White House: Don’t talk about NSA reform meetings at the White House.

Obama promised at his end-year press conference last month to have a "pretty definitive statment" on NSA surveillance reform in January.
National Journal
Dustin Volz
Jan. 8, 2014, 7:49 a.m.

Cap­it­ol Hill is hold­ing its own ver­sion of Fight Club Wed­nes­day, as a small num­ber of hand-picked in­tel­li­gence staffers are des­cend­ing on the White House this af­ter­noon for a top-secret meet­ing to talk about gov­ern­ment sur­veil­lance re­form.

No one ap­pears to know ex­actly what the meet­ing will en­tail or wheth­er the ad­min­is­tra­tion will un­veil any of­fer­ings about re­strict­ing the Na­tion­al Se­cur­ity Ad­min­is­tra­tion’s much-ma­ligned tele­phone and In­ter­net data-gath­er­ing tech­niques. And at­tendees are be­ing warned to not di­vulge any of the sens­it­ive in­form­a­tion after the huddle-up, con­tinu­ing a trend of keep­ing NSA re­form talks in the shad­ows even as crit­ics de­ride the gov­ern­ment for fail­ing to be more trans­par­ent about the agency’s sur­veil­lance activ­it­ies.

The Situ­ation Room meet­ing, ahead of an even more tightly guarded one between Pres­id­ent Obama and se­lect law­makers Thursday morn­ing in the Oval Of­fice, has a TS/SCI (top secret/sens­it­ive com­part­men­ted in­form­a­tion) clear­ance rank­ing, mean­ing the con­ver­sa­tion is highly clas­si­fied. As re­cently as Wed­nes­day morn­ing, some in­tel­li­gence staffers said they were un­clear ex­actly who had been ex­ten­ded an in­vit­a­tion or if they would even be al­lowed in the room.

The meet­ings come as Obama is sig­nal­ing an in­terest in an­noun­cing some level of re­form meas­ures be­fore his State of the Uni­on Ad­dress on Jan. 28. Any re­stric­tions on NSA sur­veil­lance would be the first since rev­el­a­tions of the agency’s sweep­ing do­mest­ic and in­ter­na­tion­al data-gath­er­ing pro­grams began sur­fa­cing.

White House press sec­ret­ary Jay Car­ney said Monday that Obama had giv­en his sur­veil­lance re­view task force’s re­com­mend­a­tion “a great deal of con­sid­er­a­tion” and re­viewed its re­port dur­ing his Hawaii va­ca­tion.

Obama “has in­sti­tuted a re­view about the NSA pro­ced­ures and broad­er is­sues that en­com­passes both the re­view group as well as oth­er ele­ments,” Car­ney said. “We know with con­fid­ence that the pres­id­ent will have made some de­cisions about which re­com­mend­a­tions he wants to im­ple­ment, which re­quire fur­ther re­view, and which we will not im­ple­ment, and you will hear him dis­cuss those is­sues later this month.”

The Los Angeles Times re­por­ted last week that Obama in­tends to present a pack­age deal that would con­cede to some of the 46 re­com­mend­a­tions re­leased re­cently by the pres­id­ent’s hand-picked five-mem­ber in­tel­li­gence re­view board. Big-tick­et changes could in­clude pla­cing a pub­lic ad­voc­ate with­in the secret For­eign In­tel­li­gence Sur­veil­lance Court and re­mov­ing the gov­ern­ment’s dir­ect con­trol of the NSA’s tele­phone metadata re­cords. In­stead, the data­base could be main­tained by tele­phone com­pan­ies or by some oth­er, as-yet un­defined, en­tity.

But pri­vacy ad­voc­ates re­main skep­tic­al that Obama in­tends to make any ser­i­ous changes to the NSA, as he re­upped his de­fense of bulk tele­phone and In­ter­net metadata col­lec­tion at his year-end press con­fer­ence last month as a “use­ful tool … to en­sure that if we have a thread on a po­ten­tial ter­ror­ist threat, that that can be fol­lowed ef­fect­ively.”

Obama’s sched­ule this week also in­cludes a meet­ing with the Pri­vacy and Civil Liber­ties Over­sight Board. In ad­di­tion, some tech­no­logy groups have been in­vited to the White House for a fol­low-up to Obama’s meet­ing in Decem­ber with high-wattage tech­no­logy ex­ec­ut­ives.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
1 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
1 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
ARE YOU THE GATEKEEPER?
Sanders: Obama Is a Progressive
21 hours ago
THE LATEST

“Do I think President Obama is a progressive? Yeah, I do,” said Bernie Sanders, in response to a direct question in tonight’s debate. “I think they’ve done a great job.” But Hillary Clinton wasn’t content to sit out the latest chapter in the great debate over the definition of progressivism. “In your definition, with you being the gatekeeper of progressivism, I don’t think anyone else fits that definition,” she told Sanders.

×