Republican FEC Commissioners Go Public With Complaints About Mystery Redaction

The GOP commissioners still can’t unlock a document that could guide political lawyers counseling campaign clients on how to avoid sanctions.

National Journal
Shane Goldmacher
March 26, 2014, 10:18 a.m.

The Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers of the Fed­er­al Elec­tion Com­mis­sion have broken their si­lence about the mys­ter­i­ous 76-page doc­u­ment that was re­dac­ted against their wishes in the dead­locked de­cision over wheth­er Cross­roads GPS was a le­git­im­ate non­profit.

In a state­ment pos­ted to the FEC’s web­site late Tues­day, the com­mis­sion’s three Re­pub­lic­ans pulled back the cur­tain a bit on the miss­ing doc­u­ment. “We do not be­lieve that these re­dac­tions are ne­ces­sary,” they wrote, say­ing they had sought to re­lease the doc­u­ments in a closed-door com­mis­sion meet­ing but “the vote failed.”

Na­tion­al Journ­al first re­por­ted the ex­ist­ence of the massive re­dac­tion and the be­hind-the-scenes con­tro­versy earli­er this month.

The sealed doc­u­ment is the ini­tial re­port from the FEC’s law­yers to the com­mis­sion, from 2011, re­com­mend­ing how to pro­ceed in the Cross­roads case, one of the most con­sequen­tial be­fore the FEC in years. That ini­tial re­port was with­drawn and re­placed with a new one from the coun­sel’s of­fice a year later. When the Re­pub­lic­ans sought to pub­lish the first re­port, along with their opin­ion in the case, it was blocked first by the Of­fice of Gen­er­al Coun­sel and later by the FEC’s Demo­crat­ic-aligned com­mis­sion­ers.

In their state­ment Tues­day even­ing, the com­mis­sion’s Re­pub­lic­ans — Lee Good­man, Car­oline Hunter, and Mat­thew Peterson — wrote that the doc­u­ment “was clearly pre­pared with an ex­pect­a­tion that it would be re­viewed by com­mis­sion­ers and the gen­er­al pub­lic.”

The con­tents of the re­dac­ted pages are im­port­ant as they could serve as a roadmap for polit­ic­al law­yers for how the FEC made its de­cision and help them provide guid­ance to polit­ic­al groups for how to avoid fu­ture sanc­tions.

“It should have been pub­licly re­leased so that it could be avail­able to a re­view­ing court and lit­ig­ants as part of the ad­min­is­trat­ive re­cord in this mat­ter,” the Re­pub­lic­an com­mis­sion­ers wrote. In their state­ment, the Re­pub­lic­ans said that the re­dac­ted pages in­clude both the law­yers’ first re­port, “along with an ac­com­pa­ny­ing Fac­tu­al and Leg­al Ana­lys­is.”

They also dis­cussed, in great­er de­tail, the dif­fer­ences between the ini­tial sealed re­port and fi­nal pub­lished one. The GOP com­mis­sion­ers said the fi­nal re­port used “a cal­en­dar year and only a cal­en­dar year” to de­term­ine wheth­er a group was a le­git­im­ate non­profit but that the Of­fice of Gen­er­al Coun­sel’s leg­al test “was evolving be­hind closed doors,” sug­gest­ing the ini­tial re­port looked at a dif­fer­ent time frame.

The Re­pub­lic­ans wrote that Cross­roads, a Karl Rove-af­fil­i­ated group, and oth­er groups “did not have clear pri­or no­tice that their re­spect­ive ma­jor pur­poses would be ana­lyzed by OGC un­der a single cal­en­dar-year rule.”

It is pos­sible the re­dac­ted doc­u­ments could still be made pub­lic, after sev­er­al groups have sued the FEC for its dead­lock in the case and could re­quest them as part of the law­suit.

What We're Following See More »
TAKING A LONG VIEW TO SOUTHERN STATES
In Dropout Speech, Santorum Endorses Rubio
2 days ago
THE DETAILS

As expected after earlier reports on Wednesday, Rick Santorum ended his presidential bid. But less expected: he threw his support to Marco Rubio. After noting he spoke with Rubio the day before for an hour, he said, “Someone who has a real understanding of the threat of ISIS, real understanding of the threat of fundamentalist Islam, and has experience, one of the things I wanted was someone who has experience in this area, and that’s why we decided to support Marco Rubio.” It doesn’t figure to help Rubio much in New Hampshire, but the Santorum nod could pay dividends down the road in southern states.

Source:
‘PITTING PEOPLE AGAINST EACH OTHER’
Rubio, Trump Question Obama’s Mosque Visit
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

President Obama’s decision to visit a mosque in Baltimore today was never going to be completely uncontroversial. And Donald Trump and Marco Rubio proved it. “Maybe he feels comfortable there,” Trump told interviewer Greta van Susteren on Fox News. “There are a lot of places he can go, and he chose a mosque.” And in New Hampshire, Rubio said of Obama, “Always pitting people against each other. Always. Look at today – he gave a speech at a mosque. Oh, you know, basically implying that America is discriminating against Muslims.”

Source:
THE TIME IS NOW, TED
Cruz Must Max Out on Evangelical Support through Early March
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

For Ted Cruz, a strong showing in New Hampshire would be nice, but not necessary. That’s because evangelical voters only make up 21% of the Granite State’s population. “But from the February 20 South Carolina primary through March 15, there are nine states (South Carolina, Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Kentucky, Mississippi, and North Carolina) with an estimated white-Evangelical percentage of the GOP electorate over 60 percent, and another four (Texas, Kansas, Louisiana, and Missouri) that come in over 50 percent.” But after that, he better be in the catbird’s seat, because only four smaller states remain with evangelical voter majorities.

Source:
CHRISTIE, BUSH TRYING TO TAKE HIM DOWN
Rubio Now Winning the ‘Endorsement Primary’
2 days ago
WHY WE CARE

Since his strong third-place finish in Iowa, Marco Rubio has won endorsement by two sitting senators and two congressmen, putting him in the lead for the first time of FiveThirtyEight‘s Endorsement Tracker. “Some politicians had put early support behind Jeb Bush — he had led [their] list since August — but since January the only new endorsement he has received was from former presidential candidate Sen. Lindsey Graham.” Meanwhile, the New York Times reports that fueled by resentment, “members of the Bush and Christie campaigns have communicated about their mutual desire to halt … Rubio’s rise in the polls.”

Source:
7 REPUBLICANS ON STAGE
Carly Fiorina Will Not Be Allowed to Debate on Saturday
1 days ago
THE LATEST

ABC News has announced the criteria for Saturday’s Republican debate, and that means Carly Fiorina won’t be a part of it. The network is demanding candidates have “a top-three finish in Iowa, a top-six standing in an average of recent New Hampshire polls or a top-six placement in national polls in order for candidates to qualify.” And there will be no “happy hour” undercard debate this time. “So that means no Fiorina vs. Jim Gilmore showdown earlier in the evening for the most ardent of campaign 2016 junkies.

Source:
×